SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

98.5 Dream Trade

Créé par: bruin238
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 6 juill. 2016
Publié: 6 juill. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Vesey, Jimmy
2925 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Krejci, David
  2. Rask, Tuukka
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Joe Morrow
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2273 000 000 $65 043 334 $0 $415 000 $7 956 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Vesey, Jimmy
925 000 $925 000 $
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 916 667 $6 916 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
975 000 $975 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juill. 2016 à 15 h 5
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Felger and Mazz? I heard Fowler + Kesler fot Rask + Krejci...
6 juill. 2016 à 15 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 0
If this came from Felger & Mazz it's more like 98.5's Nightmare Trade. Those two maniacs would blow this team up and start over every single time we lost a game if they had the chance.
6 juill. 2016 à 15 h 57
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 14
I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson > 1st Silfverberg >>> Morrow.
7 juill. 2016 à 8 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 43
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: BruinsForTheWin
I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson > 1st Silfverberg >>> Morrow.


Rask does not = Cam Fowler, and it's not even close. And krejci is 10x better than the heavily declining ryan kesler. Doesn't matter what trade proposal rask is involved in, we lose unless we're getting an elite starter back in return. Tuuks is going nowhere.
7 juill. 2016 à 19 h 18
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 508
Mentions "j'aime": 54
Quoting: TuuksMcGooks
Quoting: BruinsForTheWin
I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson > 1st Silfverberg >>> Morrow.


Rask does not = Cam Fowler, and it's not even close. And krejci is 10x better than the heavily declining ryan kesler. Doesn't matter what trade proposal rask is involved in, we lose unless we're getting an elite starter back in return. Tuuks is going nowhere.


I agree 100%. That was some dum dum analysis. Rask would be almost impossible to get a fair return on. And have you looked at Fowler's possession numbers? In no way is he equal value to Rask in any sense.
7 juill. 2016 à 20 h 58
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: zleach77
Quoting: TuuksMcGooks
Quoting: BruinsForTheWin
I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson > 1st Silfverberg >>> Morrow.


Rask does not = Cam Fowler, and it's not even close. And krejci is 10x better than the heavily declining ryan kesler. Doesn't matter what trade proposal rask is involved in, we lose unless we're getting an elite starter back in return. Tuuks is going nowhere.


I agree 100%. That was some dum dum analysis. Rask would be almost impossible to get a fair return on. And have you looked at Fowler's possession numbers? In no way is he equal value to Rask in any sense.
Appearently you guys missed last year. Rask was like goalie #20 in the league and is being paid like #3. Tuukka laid a huge deuce last year and has crap value now. He's not even worth a young top 4 dman, but I was being nice. Maybe you guys totally missed Rask fishing the puck out of the net all year at an astounding rate for a guy whos paid 7M.
8 juill. 2016 à 19 h 25
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 43
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: BruinsForTheWin
Quoting: zleach77
Quoting: TuuksMcGooks
Quoting: BruinsForTheWin
I think they are way better than you give them credit for. Sweeny is worse in terms of value gained vs value lost. It's not even an argument, Sweeny is terrible at measureing player value, just like Benning, who both had Chiarelli teach them. As for that trade we rip them off royally. Fowler = Rask. Kesler = Krejci. Gibson > 1st Silfverberg >>> Morrow.


Rask does not = Cam Fowler, and it's not even close. And krejci is 10x better than the heavily declining ryan kesler. Doesn't matter what trade proposal rask is involved in, we lose unless we're getting an elite starter back in return. Tuuks is going nowhere.


I agree 100%. That was some dum dum analysis. Rask would be almost impossible to get a fair return on. And have you looked at Fowler's possession numbers? In no way is he equal value to Rask in any sense.
Appearently you guys missed last year. Rask was like goalie #20 in the league and is being paid like #3. Tuukka laid a huge deuce last year and has crap value now. He's not even worth a young top 4 dman, but I was being nice. Maybe you guys totally missed Rask fishing the puck out of the net all year at an astounding rate for a guy whos paid 7M.

If you had any clue about what's going on with the B's, then you'd realize last year was not on Rask. Look at the team playing in front of him dude. Rask had to bail out his d on multiple occasions every game, there's only so much he could do. He also finished the season with an above average save% (.918) playing behind arguably the worst defence core in the entire league. Any argument behind trading Rask is a stupid one as far as I'm concerned, We'd spend 5-10 years looking for a better or equivalent goalie
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage