Got a deal. But is Kylington, Andersson, or Valimaki an option? If so that’d be what I’d go with if plausible

Kylington is, the other 2 no, not without a massive over payment but i was told in another thread Rangers aren't really looking for D prospects.

*Edit: Kylington is available when we have a better idea on Brodie's condition and closer to Valimaki's return

if the rangers are gone trade strome at this point when he's at ppg, 26 and rfa, its gone cost. since they very deep at D they gonna require either välimaki or a 1rounder imo. personally I think they should keep him, and i believe they are, what's the point in signing 28year old Panarin if ur gonna trade away the pieces that works and age are in pair that works with the build?

i'm really interested to see what stromes value ends up being if the rangers decide to trade him. i would like to think if a team offered a first the rangers would move him. i've always thought and still think re-signing him is the rite move and the move they will end up deciding. although, if a team offers a first i wouldn't be able to pass that up if i'm in gortons position.