There is def a playoff team that can overpay him by paying him more than 10mill i think.

Honestly i’d rather use the $ on Krug.

Trade Grizz and use his $ and the difference of Krug and Hall on Toffoli. Or just trade Grizz for a RW.

Halak is not likely going to be forced to take a pay cut. Somebody will give him 2.5. Wagner at 1.5 is a little to hopeful as well

[Coyle is 4.5 x 5 and Wagner is probably closer to 1.25, but those don't mean much...]
The bridge deals are good for Debrusk and Griz (maybe a little high for Griz though), and Bjork and Hall's deals are good!
The only one I really have any issue with is Halak, he is gonna get at least 4 million (like Lehner) anywhere else he wants to go, plus the bruins have Keyser ready to come up soon so they don't even really need him (nor will they be able to sign him).
I guess the only other thing is that unless Chara retires, they will likely sign him to a 1x1 deal out of respect, and then maybe the next year they will give him a 2-way deal or not resign him

Lol yeah like I also said, Halak will get much more, but Wagner might not! IDK

Problem 1: the bruins can’t offer hall 8 years.
Problem 2: grzelcyk and debrusk probably decline.
Problem 3: Halák definitely says no.
Problem 4: John Moore in the top four

I have no idea why but have seen 3 articles that suggest Alex Tuch might be available. If that is the case Grizz, Miller, 1st, prospect for Tuch, re-sign Krug. Problems solved.

To translate what Bcarlo25 said into nice human terms:
1. Only the team that he is on can offer 8 years, so any other team can only offer a max of 7 years
2. VOID (he thinks Grizz is worth more) - Both will accept as long as they want a bridge deal which at this point might be best for them!)
3. Halak doesn't even get an offer, they know he is worth at least 4 mil now and have Keyser almost ready
4. "John Moore {{{SHOULD NOT BE}}} in the top four." He is a top 6 guy until he can prove himself accordingly... (sentence fragments are great, but they should make sense)