SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trading Forward Depth For Defensive Depth

Créé par: sirsmokesalot412
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 17 oct. 2019
Publié: 17 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Johnson, Jack (500 000 $ retained)
  2. Riikola, Juuso
2.
PIT
  1. Brodin, Jonas
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 390 792 $132 500 $3 832 500 $4 109 208 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 oct. 2019 à 10 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Add a 1st to the ARI trade.

Add Hallander to the MIN trade and change a 3rd into a 2nd.
17 oct. 2019 à 11 h 28
#2
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Add a 1st to the ARI trade.

Add Hallander to the MIN trade and change a 3rd into a 2nd.


Lol what? a first? gtfo JJ isnt as bad as people here who have never even watched him play say he is. Maybe a 3rd at best onto JJ and JR
17 oct. 2019 à 11 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: bigZ98
Lol what? a first? gtfo JJ isnt as bad as people here who have never even watched him play say he is. Maybe a 3rd at best onto JJ and JR


Ugh how many times do I have to have this conversation. Johnson is horribly bad, this is why they are trying to trade him. If all it took to trade Johnson was depth defensemen and 3rd don't you think it would have happened by now? You aren't moving Johnson without a 1st or Hallander attached.
17 oct. 2019 à 12 h 5
#4
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Ugh how many times do I have to have this conversation. Johnson is horribly bad, this is why they are trying to trade him. If all it took to trade Johnson was depth defensemen and 3rd don't you think it would have happened by now? You aren't moving Johnson without a 1st or Hallander attached.


Johnson is indeed bad, but it won't take that much to move him.

If Zaitsev (longer contract and higher cap hit) got moved without having to give up anything major, Johnson can be too
OldNYIfan et bigZ98 a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 12 h 39
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,389
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Ugh how many times do I have to have this conversation. Johnson is horribly bad, this is why they are trying to trade him. If all it took to trade Johnson was depth defensemen and 3rd don't you think it would have happened by now? You aren't moving Johnson without a 1st or Hallander attached.


Okay, "Johnson is horribly bad." Assuming that's true (which is in dispute because he seems to have played reasonably well for the Pens the first few games of the season), then Sullivan can put him in the press box -- for the entire season, if necessary.

Now if you want to argue that his contract is heavily burdensome, which is why he should be moved, that argument fails, too. JJ can be bought out next year for a total cap hit of $2MM, including the player (Riikola, for $833,333) to replace him. That saves Pittsburgh $1.25MM off the cap at no cost to Pittsburgh. Why should the Pens pay a high price to escape that result? To put it another way, why should Pittsburgh expend a first-round draft pick to save $1,166,667 (Johnson's buy-out cap hit for two years)?

The only reason people like me were suggesting in the off-season that Pittsburgh would have to expend a significant asset to unload Johnson and his contract was their cap problem before the season started. Once Rust was injured, and could be placed on LTIR, that premise evaporated. Now there is absolutely no economic need to move Johnson at all. In short, his contract is not the millstone around Rutherford's neck that Loui Eriksson's is around Jim Benning's.
bigZ98 a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 3
#6
Démarrer sujet
BoFA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 85
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Add a 1st to the ARI trade.

Add Hallander to the MIN trade and change a 3rd into a 2nd.


Fine with the Minnesota counter. Not giving Arizona 1st. Maybe a 3rd
17 oct. 2019 à 18 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: PenGoater99
Johnson is indeed bad, but it won't take that much to move him.

If Zaitsev (longer contract and higher cap hit) got moved without having to give up anything major, Johnson can be too


They had take back terrible Ceci to make it happen. And Zaitsev isn't great but nowhere near as bad as Johnson.
17 oct. 2019 à 18 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Okay, "Johnson is horribly bad." Assuming that's true (which is in dispute because he seems to have played reasonably well for the Pens the first few games of the season), then Sullivan can put him in the press box -- for the entire season, if necessary.

Now if you want to argue that his contract is heavily burdensome, which is why he should be moved, that argument fails, too. JJ can be bought out next year for a total cap hit of $2MM, including the player (Riikola, for $833,333) to replace him. That saves Pittsburgh $1.25MM off the cap at no cost to Pittsburgh. Why should the Pens pay a high price to escape that result? To put it another way, why should Pittsburgh expend a first-round draft pick to save $1,166,667 (Johnson's buy-out cap hit for two years)?

The only reason people like me were suggesting in the off-season that Pittsburgh would have to expend a significant asset to unload Johnson and his contract was their cap problem before the season started. Once Rust was injured, and could be placed on LTIR, that premise evaporated. Now there is absolutely no economic need to move Johnson at all. In short, his contract is not the millstone around Rutherford's neck that Loui Eriksson's is around Jim Benning's.


Okay that's great you don't have to move him anymore. But if you do when everyone gets back it isn't happening without a 1st or Hallander attached.
17 oct. 2019 à 18 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: sirsmokesalot412
Fine with the Minnesota counter. Not giving Arizona 1st. Maybe a 3rd


Then the trade isn't happening. You aren't moving Johnson without attaching something very very good to it.
17 oct. 2019 à 19 h 9
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,389
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Okay that's great you don't have to move him anymore. But if you do when everyone gets back it isn't happening without a 1st or Hallander attached.


I'm betting not.
18 oct. 2019 à 9 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I'm betting not.


If it was so easy to move him it would have been done by now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage