Hutton-Girardi is the same thing as Johnson-Gudbransson, just cheaper.

And less term, which is key.
Hutton+Girardi is 100% an upgrade from Johnson-Guds too.

The issue here is that no teams are willing to give anything up for Johnson and Gudbranson, except for maybe half a can of warm mountain dew. Then again if you put that can on Crosby's wing it would probably score 30 goals.

Anaheim will give you a 2021 fourth for Gudbranson.

And we'll take it

Guds is more movable than JJ, if we dumped a 1st/2nd to get rid of JJ I think it's doable.

People are so blinded by their desire to get rid of Johnson, that hey are willing to make the team worse to do it.

You can't make the team worse if you get rid of Johnson..
You're telling me getting a younger, cheaper all around better player is getting worse?

Boyle, Girardi, Hutton < Gudbranson, Johnson.

You clearly have NEVER watched hockey

Or, I watch actual hockey as opposed to playing video games thinking that the way the players play for me in the video game is how they actually are in real life...

Good one..? Maybe?
JJ is one of the worst NHL players in the entire league, analytics wholeheartedly support that.
Guds, while playing decent in PIT isn't worth 4M to play 3rd line minutes on a cap strapped team.. do the math

To say adding a 4th line C, and getting rid of the 2 worst contracts/players on your team isn't an "upgrade" you must not watch a lot of "actual" hockey and do some major video gaming yourself there buckaroo

"buckaroo" ... it's so cute when they try.

You have nothing to say because you're wrong... GG bro fun while it lasted!

Okay bro...

also JS, ur mudders onion is stanky

Sorry, I am over 15 years old so I literally have no idea what that means.

You should just rephrase that to "sorry I'm not woke"

You win the interwebz today. Go get your trophy.

been having it