SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

5 of 31

Créé par: swinny
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 5 août 2019
Publié: 5 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I suspect haters will hate, but constructive feedback is always welcome.....

For Tkachuk, using Aho as a baseline..... given the intangibles he brings, I hope I am close.

Starting Ryan on the wing so Dube can cut his teeth. Would suggest he is in the top 6 by the Allstar break..... or I hope. If not go with Bennett - who has the ability to raise is game to anither level.

Keeping Brodie and Hamonic - simply because this team could go deep, if not all the way in a wide open West. Rotate the kids in the bottom pair and see who rises tonthe occassion.

Signed Sheahan simply for forward depth purposes. Let the kids develop rather than sit in the press box.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
79 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Laczynski, Tanner [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Conditional pick id Frolik resigns.
PHI
  1. Frolík, Michael
Détails additionnels:
Flames still need to move money, and Frolik as much as it pains, is the real option. Expiring contract, spunky and can produce a 40 point year.

Given everything the Flyers have done, I suggest they are committed to getting into the playoffs - and Frolik is a big upgrade on both Pitlick and Raffl in the bottom six. And they have the cap space to boot. I further suggest Frolik fits the traditional Flyers character of grit and some skill.

The Flames take n a longer term prospect, who imo, looks to round out at least as a very servicable top 9 forward with top 6 potential. It's a project - and far to early to tell where Laczynski falls in the spectrum.

Flames are up against it still..... GMs know it.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 180 875 $0 $747 500 $9 319 125 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 août 2019 à 16 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Aho is a ceiling for Tkachuk, not a baseline
5 août 2019 à 16 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,801
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Aho is a ceiling for Tkachuk, not a baseline


Could be. Given his far more physical nature, wasn't sure which direction to take.
5 août 2019 à 17 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 642
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Aho is a ceiling for Tkachuk, not a baseline


I would disagree... Tkachuk has almost the same numbers while playing a more physical game, drawing more penalties and all this while playing with Backs and Frolik. Both are excellent 2 way forwards but neither are offensive juggernauts! Wonder what Chucky would do if partnered with Mony and Lindholm?
5 août 2019 à 18 h 29
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,801
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: trdeJong
I would disagree... Tkachuk has almost the same numbers while playing a more physical game, drawing more penalties and all this while playing with Backs and Frolik. Both are excellent 2 way forwards but neither are offensive juggernauts! Wonder what Chucky would do if partnered with Mony and Lindholm?


In there lies the debate right? I see Tkachuk as the most rounded player in this RFA class. Yet, because he isn't Marner or Rattenen or Laine, he is worth less? This I do not get.
5 août 2019 à 22 h 27
#5
MadGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 333
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Modifié 6 août 2019 à 15 h 45
I like this trade, best Frolik one I have seen I a while. I am sure he gets moved but teams know the Flames are up against the cap so sure they are using that to low ball. Trading for a prospect RW at 22 yrs old doing well I college with maybe a mid round d 3 or 4th pick dependent on Fro resigning I think is very reasonable.
I just can't imagine the flames going over 9mill for Chucky though; although if they go shorter term they are going to have to pay way over 9 in a few years after a bridge.
It is getting stressful waiting to see what they end up doing to fit Chuck and Mangi signed up.I still have a feeling Brodie goes to Montreal, waiting for that one! Cheers
swinny a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2019 à 23 h 59
#6
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Aho is a ceiling for Tkachuk, not a baseline


Is this not very close to the Aho deal? 2 extra years for 1m more. Personally I think if they were going to give him 9.5m it would be an 8 year term.
3 sept. 2019 à 17 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Jamiepo
Is this not very close to the Aho deal? 2 extra years for 1m more. Personally I think if they were going to give him 9.5m it would be an 8 year term.


I didn't see term. I think 9.5x8 would be more than fair from both sides
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage