SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Clearing Space

Créé par: KH44
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 24 juill. 2019
Publié: 24 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Buyout Stone
Move Frolik and Bennett for Zucker - Bennett gets to go somewhere without the 4th overall tag hanging around his neck, Minnesota gets to get rid of a good player, which appears to be their MO, for some reason?
Move Brodie - a good fit in Montreal's top four, and a cost that Montreal can afford to pay. The price can vary - swap a prospect for one of the picks, or change the pick set up (two thirds, and if he re-signs or is traded by Montreal, Flames get a second).
Signing Brassard is based on Evolving Wild's projections. One year on a hopeful Stanley Cup chasing roster (last season's playoff collapse notwithstanding) to rebuild his value, and if it goes poorly, both teams get to walk away.
Shlemko to be the scratch in the pressbox.
Everyone cheering against the Flames would be happier with a cheaper price, or getting more back, and everyone cheering for the Flames thinks they moved out a lot and created some holes, but that's what the cap does. Flames top six gets better, defence relies intensely on youth and nothing going wrong, and they avoid making a bad cap situation worse.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 000 000 $
1875 000 $
23 000 000 $
67 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
If Brodie re-signs with Montreal, Flames get an additional 3rd rounder.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 795 475 $0 $747 500 $10 704 525 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juill. 2019 à 15 h 46
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Flames dress 7 d men all year and rotate three C so that Shlemko can participate in shootouts!
24 juill. 2019 à 15 h 47
#2
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 427
Mentions "j'aime": 46
I like the train of thought. Chucky at 7.5 for 6 years seems unlikely though. Still think he gets 7.95 over 5 years
24 juill. 2019 à 15 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 408
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Just wondering why you bought out Stone in this scenario as by moving Bennett, Frolik, and Brodie and only getting Zucker back now you have more than enough space to have him munch popcorn all year instead of Schlemko or even play right side on the bottom pairing if Kylington struggles on his offhand side.
24 juill. 2019 à 23 h 16
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: CN10
Just wondering why you bought out Stone in this scenario as by moving Bennett, Frolik, and Brodie and only getting Zucker back now you have more than enough space to have him munch popcorn all year instead of Schlemko or even play right side on the bottom pairing if Kylington struggles on his offhand side.


That's a fair question. Essentially, it comes down to cap space and using assets. Buying out Stone and moving those three creates 11 million in space, Zucker, Brassard and Shlemko cost 8. The 3 million in added space is to make sure if there are injuries, there is room to call guys up, it allows cap space to accumulate all year to make moves at the deadline if necessary, and clears a roster spot - sending Schlemko to the A, and bringing up a deserving player or a waiver pick up is easier than demoting a well liked veteran at this stage of his career. But not buying him out would make sense as well, it just changes the corresponding moves.
24 juill. 2019 à 23 h 25
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: DerpNation
I like the train of thought. Chucky at 7.5 for 6 years seems unlikely though. Still think he gets 7.95 over 5 years


7.5 is my accounting for his salary being 6.75 mil a year for the first three years (no one makes more than Gio!). In the following years, it spikes to 8.25 a year. Its also in Tkachuk's best interest to have the last year be worth the most money, as he would have one year before UFA, his arbitration and qualifying would be based off his last year. So a contract structure of 6.75, 6.75, 6.75, 7.25, 7.75, 9.75 would have some appeal to both sides. If he ends up at 7.95 over five, he still has two years of RFA with the Flames, something he would probably want to avoid - either a deal right to free agency, a deal one year short, or a max term deal seem more likely than a four or five year deal that lands him in another negotiation.
25 juill. 2019 à 1 h 47
#6
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 427
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: KH44
7.5 is my accounting for his salary being 6.75 mil a year for the first three years (no one makes more than Gio!). In the following years, it spikes to 8.25 a year. Its also in Tkachuk's best interest to have the last year be worth the most money, as he would have one year before UFA, his arbitration and qualifying would be based off his last year. So a contract structure of 6.75, 6.75, 6.75, 7.25, 7.75, 9.75 would have some appeal to both sides. If he ends up at 7.95 over five, he still has two years of RFA with the Flames, something he would probably want to avoid - either a deal right to free agency, a deal one year short, or a max term deal seem more likely than a four or five year deal that lands him in another negotiation.


Chucky has 3 years of service accrued with 40+ games played per season already. If he signs a 4 year contract he would be an UFA at the end of the deal.

Its 27, or 7 years with 40+ games played each year when a player becomes an UFA. Whichever comes first. So technically a player can become an UFA at age 25 if he plays a full season right at age 18, and stays in the NHL over his first 7 years.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 14
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 213
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: DerpNation
Chucky has 3 years of service accrued with 40+ games played per season already. If he signs a 4 year contract he would be an UFA at the end of the deal.

Its 27, or 7 years with 40+ games played each year when a player becomes an UFA. Whichever comes first. So technically a player can become an UFA at age 25 if he plays a full season right at age 18, and stays in the NHL over his first 7 years.


Interesting. Capfriendly still has him as an RFA at the end of that deal.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage