SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

1 for 1 Challenge

Créé par: MindControlManager
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 juin 2019
Publié: 21 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Before I start: Let's see how I do!

Few trades through: This ain't bad!

Few more: Hmm

Later: This is hard!

After: This is NOT going well!

Sometime after: I was not meant for this!

Sometime later: I give up!

After that: Ugh.

After I finished: *puts on protective gear* Well, time to publish.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
810 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 000 000 $81 050 000 $0 $0 $950 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
725 000 $725 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juin 2019 à 6 h 37
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Since when Johnsson have been worth a constant 70+ point winger?
21 juin 2019 à 6 h 44
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Since when Johnsson have been worth a constant 70+ point winger?


1) Eight years younger
2) Can be had for less money
3) His ceiling could be around 50-70 points
21 juin 2019 à 6 h 59
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: MindControlManager
1) Eight years younger
2) Can be had for less money
3) His ceiling could be around 50-70 points


1) age doesn't really matter when you compare 3rd line winger to a first line winger. 24 year old can't be considered a prospect with rising potential anymore
2) not an issue for a team like Dallas, they'd rather pay for more talented players
3) he scored 43 points with Matthews as his C. There's nothing that points to him being able to score in that rate
gregb569 a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2019 à 7 h 52
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: BurgerBoss
1) age doesn't really matter when you compare 3rd line winger to a first line winger. 24 year old can't be considered a prospect with rising potential anymore
2) not an issue for a team like Dallas, they'd rather pay for more talented players
3) he scored 43 points with Matthews as his C. There's nothing that points to him being able to score in that rate


1) If you're saying he's a third line winger, then I disagree. He is a top 6 winger imo, with a ceiling that could reach the 1st line on a team. Probably not Toronto, mind you, but somewhere a few years from now. If you're saying that because he spent time on the third line, then that's not abnormal considering Toronto's top 6 and the fact that that was his rookie season. And speaking of being a rookie, he may not be a prospect, but he definitely has rising potential. How many players have ended up peaking between 26-28?

2) So you're saying they would be completely opposed to making a 1 one 1 trade that makes them younger, faster (while maintaining a lot of skill) and while saving on the cap?

3) Matthews isn't a playmaking center. And for his rookie season, 43 points is not bad at all. I maintain the opinion that 50-70 points is a realistic ceiling for him. 50-60 most likely.

I would like to finish this post with a couple more things. 1) I'm not saying that Dallas would do this trade. But if it was offered to them, I have a hard time believing that they wouldn't at least consider it, whether seriously or not. 2) I'd like to point out that is isn't a suggested roster, nor is it a prediction. Just another entry in the 1 for 1 challenge that some have been doing around here. The idea is that the trades should be plausible, and in my opinion, I do feel that the value is there.
21 juin 2019 à 8 h 43
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,785
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: MindControlManager
1) If you're saying he's a third line winger, then I disagree. He is a top 6 winger imo, with a ceiling that could reach the 1st line on a team. Probably not Toronto, mind you, but somewhere a few years from now. If you're saying that because he spent time on the third line, then that's not abnormal considering Toronto's top 6 and the fact that that was his rookie season. And speaking of being a rookie, he may not be a prospect, but he definitely has rising potential. How many players have ended up peaking between 26-28?

2) So you're saying they would be completely opposed to making a 1 one 1 trade that makes them younger, faster (while maintaining a lot of skill) and while saving on the cap?

3) Matthews isn't a playmaking center. And for his rookie season, 43 points is not bad at all. I maintain the opinion that 50-70 points is a realistic ceiling for him. 50-60 most likely.

I would like to finish this post with a couple more things. 1) I'm not saying that Dallas would do this trade. But if it was offered to them, I have a hard time believing that they wouldn't at least consider it, whether seriously or not. 2) I'd like to point out that is isn't a suggested roster, nor is it a prediction. Just another entry in the 1 for 1 challenge that some have been doing around here. The idea is that the trades should be plausible, and in my opinion, I do feel that the value is there.


He's a middle-6 winger. LW is the weakest forward position of TOR forwards, hence he plays the 2nd line. He might be fast, but he's nothing too special. Even Janmark from Dallas could get a 40+ point season if he plays with Matthews regularly. And to be fair, there's not a high speed difference between Radulov and Johnsson, it's not like Radulov's slow by any means. Not to mention that he scores 30 points more per season.

DAL is definitely not going to even consider that trade. Radulov is far superior player of the two.
CapsHockey a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2019 à 9 h 45
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: BurgerBoss
He's a middle-6 winger. LW is the weakest forward position of TOR forwards, hence he plays the 2nd line. He might be fast, but he's nothing too special. Even Janmark from Dallas could get a 40+ point season if he plays with Matthews regularly. And to be fair, there's not a high speed difference between Radulov and Johnsson, it's not like Radulov's slow by any means. Not to mention that he scores 30 points more per season.

DAL is definitely not going to even consider that trade. Radulov is far superior player of the two.


I feel the need to point out that I didn't say Radulov was slow. Even considered leaving out that part of the comment because I didn't want you to think I was implying that.

I agree that (as of now at least) that Radulov is the better player, but I disagree that he is the FAR superior player. I also do think Dallas would consider it. We're at an impasse however, so let's just agree to disagree.

Thanks for the discussion. I was hoping more people would show up and give their opinions on how I did with the challenge, but alas...
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2019 à 10 h 24
#7
GoJetsGo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,144
Mentions "j'aime": 522
The forwards are pretty good, there's somtimes a bit of an age gap but mostly pretty even talent wise.
The defense is where it gets tough, the Reilly, Muzzin and Dermott trades you lost which really makes the defense look depleted.
The goalies are good, again Rinne a lot older than Andersen but similar talent wise, and Bibeau and Sparks also a wash.
MindControlManager a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage