right side of the d looks horrible!

Okposo will go to Minnesota. Yandle is possible but last resort I think for the B's, we want a more defensive guy. Plus Krug will be resigned for cheaper and does the same job. Vesey is 50/50 at this point but I'd be more inclined to say he will go to Buffalo. Chara isn't going anywhere he will retire a Bruin at the end of his contract if he continues to slide. Kulikov is borderline top 4. On a good team he should be a 5-6. Way too much to give. Kevan Miller top 2? Awful. Sorry this is a terrible team with pretty bad moves.

Don't you mean the whole thing?

And Klew, Kulikov is a top 4 guy. He's not a "borderline" top 4 defenseman.

Tell that to the advanced analytics guys.
Kulikov compared to Torey Krug. http://public.tableau.com/shared/CFG78Z9N8?:display_count=yes
Just because he plays Top 4 minutes doesn't mean he's good at it.

Sorry, but "advanced analytics," don't do it for me. The eye test is 10x better. Kevan Miller had better advanced stats than Kulkov, and yet...I would take Kulikov 10x10. If advanced stats are your go-to, please refrain from debating.

They are not my go-to.. In fact I used to hate them. I agree eye test is a good indicator of quality. However these stats also do paint a picture and NHL teams do use them when deciding for and against getting a player. So they do have use. I like to use both nowadays. I agree Kulikov is better than Miller but that's not hard at all. I just wouldn't give up those assets for him.

Oh, I wouldn't touch that offer as well. The 14th overall, alone, is too much for the UFA, Kulikov. I like him as a player, think he's a top 4 defenseman (even on a good team -- which is where we differ), but Subban + 14th doesn't do it for me. Would rather draft Fabbro, McAvoy, Bean or hell see if Chychrun/Sergachev/Juolevi drop -- LONG SHOT -- and let them develop. All have top 4 potential and you'll have them under control on 3 year ELC's.

The Right side of the D is BAD