SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping and losing

Créé par: brenfox31
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2019
Publié: 12 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Kept:
-Karlson
-Pavelski
- Meier (bridge)
-Labanc (bridge)
-donskoi
-Heed
-Ryan
-All good AHLers

Lost:
-Braun and Melker (traded)
-Thornton (retired?)
- Nyquist (duh)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
25 280 000 $
2780 000 $
2780 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
36 000 000 $
710 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
11 050 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
anywhere
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de ARI
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $79 460 750 $660 750 $20 000 $3 539 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 635 000 $1 635 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,150
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Simek is definitely in the top 6 next season he was actually really good this year til he got hurt...perfect stay at home partner for Burns...if I was Wilson i might try to trade dillon here and lose donskoi and use that cash for Nyquist. Meier Couture Nyquist line has been money while Donskoi has been in DeBoers dog house
brenfox31 et bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 54
#2
Burnzie88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 65
underpaid Labanc
brenfox31, sabres1108 et bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 26
#3
Démarrer sujet
Brendan Fox
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 511
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
underpaid Labanc


agreed, he was the last one left and i used what I had. I wanna raise it, but maybe just reduce the term.
TheBeardOfBurns a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 28
#4
Démarrer sujet
Brendan Fox
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 511
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: sabres1108
Simek is definitely in the top 6 next season he was actually really good this year til he got hurt...perfect stay at home partner for Burns...if I was Wilson i might try to trade dillon here and lose donskoi and use that cash for Nyquist. Meier Couture Nyquist line has been money while Donskoi has been in DeBoers dog house


I would agree, except IDK if it's worth it to lose Donskoi and Dillon for just Nyquist, I'm thinking of maybe changing Donskoi for a cheaper option and locking up some of the guys here longer term - more cash to them.
sabres1108 a aimé ceci.
13 mai 2019 à 5 h 37
#5
oh how i suffer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 332
Quoting: brenfox31
I would agree, except IDK if it's worth it to lose Donskoi and Dillon for just Nyquist, I'm thinking of maybe changing Donskoi for a cheaper option and locking up some of the guys here longer term - more cash to them.


The idea of NOT locking Timo up for as many years as possible at a reasonably low pricetag is just completely confusing to me - like, why on earth would you not lock him down for at least 5? And yeah, add another million at least to that Labanc salary - arbitration eligible or not, he's more than earned it.

And dude, Donskoi is gooooooooone. It makes me sad as hell because I love him and his Playoff Mode, but he's been in PDB's doghouse for literal months now and I don't think that one goal (no matter how great) is going to get him out of there. (I don't think he's ever going to be a high goal count kinda guy - he's a passer, not a shooter - but god forbid we play to that strength and try him as a center - neeeever gonna happen here.) Anyway, his fiancee didn't even try out for her spot on the 49ers cheer squad this year and I think it's at least partly because they both know the writing's on the wall frown frown frown
13 mai 2019 à 16 h 14
#6
Démarrer sujet
Brendan Fox
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 511
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: bunnymcfoo
The idea of NOT locking Timo up for as many years as possible at a reasonably low pricetag is just completely confusing to me - like, why on earth would you not lock him down for at least 5? And yeah, add another million at least to that Labanc salary - arbitration eligible or not, he's more than earned it.

And dude, Donskoi is gooooooooone. It makes me sad as hell because I love him and his Playoff Mode, but he's been in PDB's doghouse for literal months now and I don't think that one goal (no matter how great) is going to get him out of there. (I don't think he's ever going to be a high goal count kinda guy - he's a passer, not a shooter - but god forbid we play to that strength and try him as a center - neeeever gonna happen here.) Anyway, his fiancee didn't even try out for her spot on the 49ers cheer squad this year and I think it's at least partly because they both know the writing's on the wall frown frown frown


Just wanna know if these changes seem right to you, I appreciate your thoughts. This was about keeping as many guys as possible, not just having the best situation. So:

- Cut Donskoi (Gain 2.5 million)
-Change Labanc to 4x4 (lose 1 million)
- Add 1 million to Meier and lock up long term (lose 1-1.5 million)

Sound reasonable? We could add a cheap depth guy in there with some tinkering too if needed.
16 mai 2019 à 2 h 51
#7
oh how i suffer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 332
Quoting: brenfox31
Just wanna know if these changes seem right to you, I appreciate your thoughts. This was about keeping as many guys as possible, not just having the best situation. So:

- Cut Donskoi (Gain 2.5 million)
-Change Labanc to 4x4 (lose 1 million)
- Add 1 million to Meier and lock up long term (lose 1-1.5 million)

Sound reasonable? We could add a cheap depth guy in there with some tinkering too if needed.


Thumbs up from me!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage