SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Every single AVs AGM team for the last year

Créé par: ThatGuy
Équipe: 2018-19 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 10 avr. 2019
Publié: 10 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha What a waste of time.

Must have been nice while it lasted.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Hughes, Jack
3925 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2679 500 000 $68 458 928 $0 $2 195 000 $11 041 072 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Hughes, Jack
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 975 000 $1 975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 937 500 $3 937 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
833 333 $833 333 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 14
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
I agree. Good pick up from Nashville.

And re-read what I wrote about Abramov, I don't feel like repeating my self


Most of his points came in the second half...that is still eyepopping...like I said you cant just say hes better than 1 guy after the first year of his pro career while the other hasn't started it..you might be able to make that claim next year when you can compare apples to apples but right now you are just saying I like my guy better than your guy bc hes on my team

There is no evidence to back up your claim
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 18
#27
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
Most of his points came in the second half...that is still eyepopping...like I said you cant just say hes better than 1 guy after the first year of his pro career while the other hasn't started it..you might be able to make that claim next year when you can compare apples to apples but right now you are just saying I like my guy better than your guy bc hes on my team

There is no evidence to back up your claim


Your guy was on my team as well. So I followed him even after he was traded. I didn't just do a quick stats search like you apparently did on Abromov.

I'm telling you Girard and the 4OA are the key piece in the deal. Bowers is secondary.
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 21
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
Your guy was on my team as well. So I followed him even after he was traded. I didn't just do a quick stats search like you apparently did on Abromov.

I'm telling you Girard and the 4OA are the key piece in the deal. Bowers is secondary.


Columbus fans didnt flinch at giving up Abromov bc hes not even one of their top 5 prospects either...so whats your point. You are acting like hes special now when CBJ fans are sayign the exact same thing youa re saying about Bowers.

You might have to take your homer glasses off a bit on this one. I am not saying Bowers is a stud, but you are trying to act like hes meaningless and a lesser asset compared to Abromov with absolutely nothing to back that up
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 25
#29
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
Columbus fans didnt flinch at giving up Abromov bc hes not even one of their top 5 prospects either...so whats your point. You are acting like hes special now when CBJ fans are sayign the exact same thing youa re saying about Bowers.

You might have to take your homer glasses off a bit on this one. I am not saying Bowers is a stud, but you are trying to act like hes meaningless and a lesser asset compared to Abromov with absolutely nothing to back that up


https://www.nhl.com/news/columbus-blue-jackets-prospect-watch/c-299682978

Nice try buddy.
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 28
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187


so an article written before the season started and him playing in the AHL and seeing him struggle. Aug 8th 2018 vs February 2019 would be quite the change in their org rankings. Not trying its just what was said on twitter and these forums when that trade went down. Might have to check the time stamps next time and just not google an old out of date article to back up a claim that is almost a full pro season later
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 29
#31
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
so an article written before the season started and him playing in the AHL and seeing him struggle. Aug 8th 2018 vs February 2019 would be quite the change in their org rankings. Not trying its just what was said on twitter and these forums when that trade went down. Might have to check the time stamps next time and just not google an old out of date article to back up a claim that is almost a full pro season later


hahaahhahahahah you're treading water. laugh
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 34
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
hahaahhahahahah you're treading water. laugh


so no response, and deflecting? Yeah you dont have an actual hockey rebuttal that you might be in the wrong here. A NHL.com writter who isnt a prospect expert, writes something in august that is out of date to what was said 8 months later that CBJ fans rank their prospects afterwards. Sure im treading water....

https://www.1stohiobattery.com/columbus-blue-jackets-analysis/2019/01/3120/breaking-down-the-top-20-prospects-in-the-blue-jackets-organization
In January 2019 guys had him already at 4.... so we can easily play this game but you dont have a good response to this just claim to your old out of date cherry picking article
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 45
#33
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
so no response, and deflecting? Yeah you dont have an actual hockey rebuttal that you might be in the wrong here. A NHL.com writter who isnt a prospect expert, writes something in august that is out of date to what was said 8 months later that CBJ fans rank their prospects afterwards. Sure im treading water....

https://www.1stohiobattery.com/columbus-blue-jackets-analysis/2019/01/3120/breaking-down-the-top-20-prospects-in-the-blue-jackets-organization
In January 2019 guys had him already at 4.... so we can easily play this game but you dont have a good response to this just claim to your old out of date cherry picking article


You said: hes not even one of their top 5 prospects either...so whats your point


Your Article has him in the top 5 organizational prospects (4, and 2nd best foward). You're just reinforcing my point and proving that you were just talking out of you A** and being hypocritical earlier.

https://twitter.com/scottcwheeler/status/1099003845487714309

Scott Wheeler contributor to the Athletic had him at #2 in Feb.
10 avr. 2019 à 11 h 52
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
You said: hes not even one of their top 5 prospects either...so whats your point


Your Article has him in the top 5 organizational prospects (4, and 2nd best foward). You're just reinforcing my point and proving that you were just talking out of you A** and being hypocritical earlier.

https://twitter.com/scottcwheeler/status/1099003845487714309

Scott Wheeler contributor to the Athletic had him at #2 in Feb.


I said that CBJ fans were claiming he wasnt even one of their top 5 prospects...I have no skin in this game...just saying how CBJ fans claiming he wasnt one of their top prospects so its no big lose just like how you are claiming Bowers wasnt one of the Sens so who cares.

I am not being a hypocrite , I am point out how you are being a hypocrite on this one.
10 avr. 2019 à 13 h 47
#35
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
I said that CBJ fans were claiming he wasnt even one of their top 5 prospects...I have no skin in this game...just saying how CBJ fans claiming he wasnt one of their top prospects so its no big lose just like how you are claiming Bowers wasnt one of the Sens so who cares.

I am not being a hypocrite , I am point out how you are being a hypocrite on this one.


I heard different from the few CBJ fans I know.

Anyways, it doesn't really matter. IDK why we're even arguing about this. On my first comment (when I said it was a wash), I said that gaining Abramov washed up giving up Bowers. So you can settle down now.

AND The whole point of this AGM is too call out all the AVs AGM who had them picking Hughes 1OA. Including 3/4 of your AGM teams. Like seriously, the number of times I've seen you on here arguing that you'd rather have 18.5% than pretty much anything else is pretty laughable especially now that we have the results. Goes to show that 18.5 is far from an automatic.
10 avr. 2019 à 14 h 43
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
I heard different from the few CBJ fans I know.

Anyways, it doesn't really matter. IDK why we're even arguing about this. On my first comment (when I said it was a wash), I said that gaining Abramov washed up giving up Bowers. So you can settle down now.

AND The whole point of this AGM is too call out all the AVs AGM who had them picking Hughes 1OA. Including 3/4 of your AGM teams. Like seriously, the number of times I've seen you on here arguing that you'd rather have 18.5% than pretty much anything else is pretty laughable especially now that we have the results. Goes to show that 18.5 is far from an automatic.


Avs are a playoff team and still get a Top 4 pick bc of the Sens...you arent making fun or riling up any Avs fans here. Sens are still a mickey mouse run organization with no hope in sight bc of how toxic their owner is. Avs are more than happy with all the assets they got from that trade and have made back to back playoffs bc of it
10 avr. 2019 à 14 h 53
#37
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
Avs are a playoff team and still get a Top 4 pick bc of the Sens...you arent making fun or riling up any Avs fans here. Sens are still a mickey mouse run organization with no hope in sight bc of how toxic their owner is. Avs are more than happy with all the assets they got from that trade and have made back to back playoffs bc of it


"Playoff team"

Because of the broken playoff format. A team finishing 17 out 31 shouldn't make the playoff, but that's another conversation for another time
10 avr. 2019 à 14 h 57
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
"Playoff team"

Because of the broken playoff format. A team finishing 17 out 31 shouldn't make the playoff, but that's another conversation for another time


They were 8th in the West as well, this format, old format, still a playoff team. Was the old system broken too or are you going to claim avs are not a playoff team in a new playoff system that you havent made up yet

Montreal got to beat up on soup cans like Ottawa, Detroit, and Sabres 4-5 times a year. Not going to feel bad for them that they missed the playoff yet playing in the weakest division in the league
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 0
#39
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
They were 8th in the West as well, this format, old format, still a playoff team. Was the old system broken too or are you going to claim avs are not a playoff team in a new playoff system that you havent made up yet

Montreal got to beat up on soup cans like Ottawa, Detroit, and Sabres 4-5 times a year. Not going to feel bad for them that they missed the playoff yet playing in the weakest division in the league


Yeah, also soup cans like Tampa, Boston, Toronto, Washington,
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 7
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
Yeah, also soup cans like Tampa, Boston, Toronto, Washington,


you are trying to hard its hilarious. Make a claim that Avs only made it bc of a broken playoff format....would still make it under the old one...Oh well yeah Montreal had good teams in their division too...FYI Wsh isn in their division, but you should know what teams play in the Sens division right

And Avs had Nashville, Blues, Jets, Stars all playoff teams ontop of the Avs, and the weak guys in the division were the wild and hawks yet still being over 80 point teams .

Keep trying though
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 14
#41
BeastMode5515
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,538
Mentions "j'aime": 416
Quoting: ThatGuy
Oh I know why you're so triggered laugh laugh laugh

You were one of them who made a Hughes to Avs AGM. I kinda expected that from you

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/859977


bruh
ThatGuy a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 17
#42
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
you are trying to hard its hilarious. Make a claim that Avs only made it bc of a broken playoff format....would still make it under the old one...Oh well yeah Montreal had good teams in their division too...FYI Wsh isn in their division, but you should know what teams play in the Sens division right

And Avs had Nashville, Blues, Jets, Stars all playoff teams ontop of the Avs, and the weak guys in the division were the wild and hawks yet still being over 80 point teams .

Keep trying though


Trying what?
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 19
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
Trying what?


deflecting everytime your points fall apart....moving the goal posts bc you made a incorrect statement
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 30
#44
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
deflecting everytime your points fall apart....moving the goal posts bc you made a incorrect statement


Did you know that wild card applies to both divisions in the conference?
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 36
#45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
Did you know that wild card applies to both divisions in the conference?


Yeah and the pacific 4th place team wasnt good enough to get a WC spot. The Yotes had 86 points...Avs had 90 and Stars had 93. And surprise surprise even in the old system they would be ranked Stars 7th, Avs, 8th, and Yotes 9th missing the playoffs.

What is your point here...old system new system Avs are still a playoff team and more to the point your claim only bc of a broken system has 0 substance to it
10 avr. 2019 à 15 h 38
#46
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: coga16
Yeah and the pacific 4th place team wasnt good enough to get a WC spot. The Yotes had 86 points...Avs had 90 and Stars had 93. And surprise surprise even in the old system they would be ranked Stars 7th, Avs, 8th, and Yotes 9th missing the playoffs.

What is your point here...old system new system Avs are still a playoff team and more to the point your claim only bc of a broken system has 0 substance to it


The whole point of fixing the broken format isn't going to back to old broken formats.
10 avr. 2019 à 16 h 1
#47
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ThatGuy
The whole point of fixing the broken format isn't going to back to old broken formats.


And avs made the playoffs in the new and old. To claim USA s broken system just bc the avs made it, being a top 8 team in the conference. In your fantasy world the only way avs don’t make the playoffs bc of your broken system is to get rid of conferences

Sorry bud but you are grasping at straws here trying so hard to discredit the avs making the playoffs
10 avr. 2019 à 16 h 35
#48
Démarrer sujet
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Exactly!! 1-16 playoff format would be the fairest
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage