SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideas

Créé par: Lights
Équipe: 2019-20 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2019
Publié: 14 mars 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Idk what Point gets but can't imagine it's more than Kucherov with the state taxes.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
79 250 000 $
31 250 000 $
21 150 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
22 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $81 943 331 $0 $1 362 500 $1 056 669 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 6
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance147 500 $$148K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars 2019 à 16 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 414
Mentions "j'aime": 86
I'd like to see colorado on the other side of that trade (as an avs fan). Callahan and Miller for Nieto and Andrighetto rights. Or Barberio, I don't care. Avs can afford to take on Callahan's contract and will actually use him. He's an upgrade over any one of our 4th liners. And Miller can fill the Soderberg role when his contract is up next year. What would you want from the Avs for Callahan and Miller?
14 mars 2019 à 16 h 17
#2
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,963
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Callahan is a cash dump and Brown would be compensation for said cash dump(while sorta being a cash dump himself) so I think Tampa wouldn't expect a lot in return as long as the return didn't include much in the way of salary.
14 mars 2019 à 16 h 31
#3
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,963
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
More I look at this, the more I think Carolina would be the best trading partner for Tampa in this type of deal. The Canes have the most cap space, need offence and have a logjam at d. Match made in heaven.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2019 à 17 h 7
#4
Eichel Tower
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 4,716
Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
One has to wonder why this was not completed at the TDL. Tampa could use a RHD and I am sure there were many teams that would been happy to take on Miller with only one year of Callahan's salary. It was a hot rumor that Ristolainen was headed to Tampa, but this trade makes sense and I thought a trade involving Bogosian would work if Betterall retained part of Zach's salary.

Then I speculated why Beaulieu was traded so late that maybe he was part of the deal. Callahan, Miller and Sergachev for Beaulieu, Bogosian, Shark's 1st and STL 2nd with additions and salary retention. Beaulieu is certainly not as talented as Sergachev but he has a decent NHL resume, Bogosian is not Ristolainen, but he would be less expensive and his contract runs out next year. Moving Callahan and Miller would allow BriseBois to sign Point. Adding Miller and Sergachev would upgrade Buffalo's center and LHD. Then Betterall could lean back with satisfaction that he traded O'Reilly, Kane for Sergachev, Montour and Miller. BriseBois gets his RHD, dumps cap to sign Point and adds a first and second round pick. He sets his team for the playoffs, for next year and with the picks for the future.

Just spitballin' and looking for comments.

Quoting: adamkaz23
I'd like to see colorado on the other side of that trade (as an avs fan). Callahan and Miller for Nieto and Andrighetto rights. Or Barberio, I don't care. Avs can afford to take on Callahan's contract and will actually use him. He's an upgrade over any one of our 4th liners. And Miller can fill the Soderberg role when his contract is up next year. What would you want from the Avs for Callahan and Miller?


Quoting: Jay27
Callahan is a cash dump and Brown would be compensation for said cash dump(while sorta being a cash dump himself) so I think Tampa wouldn't expect a lot in return as long as the return didn't include much in the way of salary.


Quoting: Jay27
More I look at this, the more I think Carolina would be the best trading partner for Tampa in this type of deal. The Canes have the most cap space, need offence and have a logjam at d. Match made in heaven.
14 mars 2019 à 17 h 11
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,811
Mentions "j'aime": 1,401
Quoting: adamkaz23
I'd like to see colorado on the other side of that trade (as an avs fan). Callahan and Miller for Nieto and Andrighetto rights. Or Barberio, I don't care. Avs can afford to take on Callahan's contract and will actually use him. He's an upgrade over any one of our 4th liners. And Miller can fill the Soderberg role when his contract is up next year. What would you want from the Avs for Callahan and Miller?


I'm not really a Bolts fan so I can't really say. Maybe like a 2nd rounder?
14 mars 2019 à 17 h 13
#6
KUUUCH
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: GMTD
One has to wonder why this was not completed at the TDL. Tampa could use a RHD and I am sure there were many teams that would been happy to take on Miller with only one year of Callahan's salary. It was a hot rumor that Ristolainen was headed to Tampa, but this trade makes sense and I thought a trade involving Bogosian would work if Betterall retained part of Zach's salary.

Then I speculated why Beaulieu was traded so late that maybe he was part of the deal. Callahan, Miller and Sergachev for Beaulieu, Bogosian, Shark's 1st and STL 2nd with additions and salary retention. Beaulieu is certainly not as talented as Sergachev but he has a decent NHL resume, Bogosian is not Ristolainen, but he would be less expensive and his contract runs out next year. Moving Callahan and Miller would allow BriseBois to sign Point. Adding Miller and Sergachev would upgrade Buffalo's center and LHD. Then Betterall could lean back with satisfaction that he traded O'Reilly, Kane for Sergachev, Montour and Miller. BriseBois gets his RHD, dumps cap to sign Point and adds a first and second round pick. He sets his team for the playoffs, for next year and with the picks for the future.

Just spitballin' and looking for comments.


I agree, I'm pretty surprised this wasn't taken care of at the TDL... A Gudas return would be interesting. Unlikely, but interesting.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2019 à 17 h 16
#7
Jay27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,963
Mentions "j'aime": 1,104
Quoting: GMTD
One has to wonder why this was not completed at the TDL. Tampa could use a RHD and I am sure there were many teams that would been happy to take on Miller with only one year of Callahan's salary. It was a hot rumor that Ristolainen was headed to Tampa, but this trade makes sense and I thought a trade involving Bogosian would work if Betterall retained part of Zach's salary.

Then I speculated why Beaulieu was traded so late that maybe he was part of the deal. Callahan, Miller and Sergachev for Beaulieu, Bogosian, Shark's 1st and STL 2nd with additions and salary retention. Beaulieu is certainly not as talented as Sergachev but he has a decent NHL resume, Bogosian is not Ristolainen, but he would be less expensive and his contract runs out next year. Moving Callahan and Miller would allow BriseBois to sign Point. Adding Miller and Sergachev would upgrade Buffalo's center and LHD. Then Betterall could lean back with satisfaction that he traded O'Reilly, Kane for Sergachev, Montour and Miller. BriseBois gets his RHD, dumps cap to sign Point and adds a first and second round pick. He sets his team for the playoffs, for next year and with the picks for the future.

Just spitballin' and looking for comments.


Something like this may just happen in the offseason, especially if Callahan is willing to waive his nmc for Buffalo. Biggest reason Tampa didn't make a move at the TDL though is you have the best team in the NHL by far up to that point. Brisebois did the best thing he could, nothing. You dont mess with that chemistry.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2019 à 18 h 58
#8
KUUUCH
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 179
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: Jay27
Something like this may just happen in the offseason, especially if Callahan is willing to waive his nmc for Buffalo. Biggest reason Tampa didn't make a move at the TDL though is you have the best team in the NHL by far up to that point. Brisebois did the best thing he could, nothing. You dont mess with that chemistry.


I understand the reasoning behind Tampa's "trade-less" TDL. I wanted Panarin / Stone if the price was right, but at the very least was hoping for a couple depth fwds and dmen... Especially with how cheap they went for on TDL day...

1995-96 Red Wings: 2nd best all time reg season finish (131 pts)... Lost in round 3.
2005-06 Red Wings: 5th best all time reg season finish (124 pts)... Lost in round 1.
1970-71 Bruins: 6th best all time reg season finish (121 pts)... Lost in round 1.
2009-10 Capitals: 7th best all time reg season finish (121 pts)... Lost in round 1.
2015-16 Capitals: 9th best all time reg season finish (120 pts)... Lost in round 2.

Only 8 times has an NHL team won both the President's Trophy & the Stanley Cup in the same year.

I'm not denying how dominant we've been this year, I'm just sharing history and why I'm pissed that we didn't even make a trade for a couple proven NHL experienced depth players. Oh whale, TDL is in the past. Either Tampa wins the cup this year and the boys resign on team friendly deals, but if they get eliminated again this year... Don't be shocked if big changes are made.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage