SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gilly come back

Créé par: jpozz1996
Équipe: 2019-20 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 12 mars 2019
Publié: 12 mars 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Is this team good? No. Fire Benning 2 weeks before draft day, bring back Gilman and let him take control at July 1. The issue isn't draft day or TDL, the issue has always been July 1, and we need someone new for looking over that day. Also, get some new Pro Scouts, that department is ridiculous. Getting a top-3 draft pick would also help out but that shouldn't be expected with Canuck luck.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3816 000 $
3816 000 $
2816 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 133 000 $
2725 000 $
31 725 000 $
1800 000 $
23 155 500 $
2775 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 500 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1750 000 $
1850 000 $
21 250 000 $
56 000 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
2900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Teves, Josh
1925 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
3.
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de FLA
Logo de EDM
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $64 851 268 $0 $6 212 500 $18 148 732 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 133 000 $7 133 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
847 500 $847 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
675 000 $675 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 450 000 $$1M)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mars 2019 à 1 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 906
Mentions "j'aime": 348
Man that left wing looks deplorable Garbage #1, Antoine Roussel, Garbage #2 and Garbage #3. I hope we can land Jack Hughes or Kappo Kakko and stick them on Pettersson's left wing.
12 mars 2019 à 3 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 735
Mentions "j'aime": 143
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Man that left wing looks deplorable Garbage #1, Antoine Roussel, Garbage #2 and Garbage #3. I hope we can land Jack Hughes or Kappo Kakko and stick them on Pettersson's left wing.


Hughes is a center Honestly if VAN wins the lottery I would not be surprised they move back to #2 for Kappo and another Asset (Maybe that teams 2nd + Prospect) I know VAN fans think it would be sick to see both Hughes brothers on the same team like the Sedins but VAN has no need for another Center. They already have Horvat and Pettersson .

Could you imagine a line of Kappo-Pettersson-Boeser would easy contend for a Top 3 line in the NHL
12 mars 2019 à 7 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: DocArin0
Hughes is a center Honestly if VAN wins the lottery I would not be surprised they move back to #2 for Kappo and another Asset (Maybe that teams 2nd + Prospect) I know VAN fans think it would be sick to see both Hughes brothers on the same team like the Sedins but VAN has no need for another Center. They already have Horvat and Pettersson .

Could you imagine a line of Kappo-Pettersson-Boeser would easy contend for a Top 3 line in the NHL


Yeah, I want Hughes over Kakko - then Pettersson can play left wing. He honestly cannot win a faceoff to save his life so I’d like to see him have help. Though having a bigger body in Kakko would be nice too.
12 mars 2019 à 11 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
I don't know that your team is better than the Canucks right now. You bleed value in your Hutton & Tanev trades. Signing Myers to that contract is classic Benning not Gilly.

I'd rather keep Tanev one more year and lose him for nothing than that trade + Meyers signing.
12 mars 2019 à 16 h 19
#5
Démarrer sujet
anonymous96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 97
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: sedin33
I don't know that your team is better than the Canucks right now. You bleed value in your Hutton & Tanev trades. Signing Myers to that contract is classic Benning not Gilly.

I'd rather keep Tanev one more year and lose him for nothing than that trade + Meyers signing.


The idea is that this team is 5 years into a Benning rebuild, and there is no way to make this team better for next year under the current circumstances. So I agree that this team is bad on paper, but on the outlook there is room to leave space for upcoming prospects. These trades are more about ridding of contracts than getting maximized value. Like I said, the issue isn't TDL and the Draft, Benning has done okay drafting, but come July 1st he signs outrageous contracts that just handcuff the team. Asset management Is now the issue, not developing a prospect pool.
12 mars 2019 à 17 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: jpozz1996
The idea is that this team is 5 years into a Benning rebuild, and there is no way to make this team better for next year under the current circumstances. So I agree that this team is bad on paper, but on the outlook there is room to leave space for upcoming prospects. These trades are more about ridding of contracts than getting maximized value. Like I said, the issue isn't TDL and the Draft, Benning has done okay drafting, but come July 1st he signs outrageous contracts that just handcuff the team. Asset management Is now the issue, not developing a prospect pool.


Hutton is not a contract dump. In fact, he's better than Myers now. Signing Myers for that contract will handcuff the team.

I agree with your pov re asset management. We disagree with how to do that.
12 mars 2019 à 18 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
anonymous96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 97
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: sedin33
Hutton is not a contract dump. In fact, he's better than Myers now. Signing Myers for that contract will handcuff the team.

I agree with your pov re asset management. We disagree with how to do that.


Hutton = more contract numbers than contract dump. Now if the Canucks move on from Edler, then yes resign Hutton I agree. However I don't see the point in bringing back Edler and Hutton, cause then you're going to lose a guy like Sautner or Brisebois through waivers unless you look to move one of those guys.

By trading Hutton with Sutter, you're not getting as good as a return, however you are getting a former 1st round pick who could slide into a 4th line centreman role in a few years.
12 mars 2019 à 19 h 14
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: jpozz1996
Hutton = more contract numbers than contract dump. Now if the Canucks move on from Edler, then yes resign Hutton I agree. However I don't see the point in bringing back Edler and Hutton, cause then you're going to lose a guy like Sautner or Brisebois through waivers unless you look to move one of those guys.

By trading Hutton with Sutter, you're not getting as good as a return, however you are getting a former 1st round pick who could slide into a 4th line centreman role in a few years.


Your Hutton scenario is not asset management. It's the opposite. Hutton is one year older than Sautner and much much better. A 25 year old defenseman who can be a good 2nd pair or very good 3rd pair is very valuable.

Much rather cut Sautner than trade Hutton for that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage