SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2019 TDL

Créé par: Yojimbo
Équipe: 2018-19 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2019
Publié: 19 févr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Dzingel, Ryan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Pearson, Tanner
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
2.
NYR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2019 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de OTT
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $75 561 559 $0 $132 500 $3 938 441 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
794 167 $794 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 7
#1
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Man, I'm a Pens fan, but there's no way to Pearson have a higher value than Dzingel. Even with some term left on his contract. I'd be stunned if Dorion accept that trade. It's pretty bad even for him. As for McQuaid, we should have to offer the 2019 4h pick instead of 2020. A 2019 4th pick and a 2020 7th.
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 41
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Willian_Cardoso
Man, I'm a Pens fan, but there's no way to Pearson have a higher value than Dzingel. Even with some term left on his contract. I'd be stunned if Dorion accept that trade. It's pretty bad even for him. As for McQuaid, we should have to offer the 2019 4h pick instead of 2020. A 2019 4th pick and a 2020 7th.


That's why I did Pearson and a 1st for Dzingel and a 2nd. I was going to go Pearson and a 2nd for just Dzingel, but the Pens don't have a 2nd. (Pearson needs to be included for cap reasons)
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 47
#3
IgorKutchakokov
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 561
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: biglite351
That's why I did Pearson and a 1st for Dzingel and a 2nd. I was going to go Pearson and a 2nd for just Dzingel, but the Pens don't have a 2nd. (Pearson needs to be included for cap reasons)


That misses the plot.. this would only move the Senators up in the draft by like 5-10 spots to take on a bad contract for 2 more years and lose a coveted rental they hope to use toward building a future.
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: Willian_Cardoso
Man, I'm a Pens fan, but there's no way to Pearson have a higher value than Dzingel. Even with some term left on his contract. I'd be stunned if Dorion accept that trade. It's pretty bad even for him. As for McQuaid, we should have to offer the 2019 4h pick instead of 2020. A 2019 4th pick and a 2020 7th.


pens don't have a 4th for 2019, the buffalo pick is conditional and they already traded their own pick. As for Dzingel, this trade is swapping a first and second in the deal as well, hence it is putting the value of Dzingel as higher than Pearson.
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 58
#5
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Quoting: biglite351
That's why I did Pearson and a 1st for Dzingel and a 2nd. I was going to go Pearson and a 2nd for just Dzingel, but the Pens don't have a 2nd. (Pearson needs to be included for cap reasons)


Pearson and a 1st for Dzingel. That's it. Why? Cause Pearson have a bad contract, as Igor already said.

However, Dorion is a trash GM. So, maybe we could get a 4th or 5th in return as well.
19 févr. 2019 à 13 h 59
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: IgorKutchakokov
That misses the plot.. this would only move the Senators up in the draft by like 5-10 spots to take on a bad contract for 2 more years and lose a coveted rental they hope to use toward building a future.


Could flip it to conditional 2nd, the lower of the ones that Ottawa has.
19 févr. 2019 à 14 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Willian_Cardoso
Pearson and a 1st for Dzingel. That's it. Why? Cause Pearson have a bad contract, as Igor already said.

However, Dorion is a trash GM. So, maybe we could get a 4th or 5th in return as well.


He is on pace for 20 goals as a Penguin, but the Pens can't keep that contract next year with Guentzel going to $6M. (They can, it would just be easier)
19 févr. 2019 à 14 h 7
#8
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Quoting: awesome
pens don't have a 4th for 2019, the buffalo pick is conditional and they already traded their own pick. As for Dzingel, this trade is swapping a first and second in the deal as well, hence it is putting the value of Dzingel as higher than Pearson.


You're right. I saw it wrong. Anyway, to me Dzingel has an even higher value than that. As for the pick, that's why I put a 1st in my suggestion.
19 févr. 2019 à 14 h 10
#9
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Quoting: biglite351
He is on pace for 20 goals as a Penguin, but the Pens can't keep that contract next year with Guentzel going to $6M. (They can, it would just be easier)


Play along Malkin and Kessel boost any player stats. Ottawa don't have a duo like that to put Pearson along. I'm not saying he's a bad player. But he's stats are inflated in our team.
19 févr. 2019 à 14 h 16
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: Willian_Cardoso
Play along Malkin and Kessel boost any player stats. Ottawa don't have a duo like that to put Pearson along. I'm not saying he's a bad player. But he's stats are inflated in our team.


To be fair, it's not like Dzingel is blockbuster... Good enough for me to go for, yes. All that and a bag of chips... no.
19 févr. 2019 à 19 h 46
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: Willian_Cardoso
You're right. I saw it wrong. Anyway, to me Dzingel has an even higher value than that. As for the pick, that's why I put a 1st in my suggestion.


im not a huge fan of Dzingel, he has more value than Pearson certainly, but by a decent margin not a massive one. Dzingel just fits better because the pens will either have to trade somebody before the deadline or flip in offseason due to cap. The most likely candidate is Pearson who they could probably get a semi decent but not great pick for in offseason.
20 févr. 2019 à 8 h 21
#12
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Quoting: awesome
im not a huge fan of Dzingel, he has more value than Pearson certainly, but by a decent margin not a massive one. Dzingel just fits better because the pens will either have to trade somebody before the deadline or flip in offseason due to cap. The most likely candidate is Pearson who they could probably get a semi decent but not great pick for in offseason.


Not a huge fan of Dzingel either. In fact, I don't think we should trade to get him. To me, Ferland is a better option than him. He can score goals like Dzingel and Ferland is still physical and more complete than him. As for Pearson as a trade candidate, 100% agreed. It's pretty obvious that he'll be Pens first option to be traded in offseason. Probably, before the draft.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage