Hollywood3131
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Agree he's a huge upgrade on Smith. Not sure he's more than a marginal upgrade on Rittich--so not worth giving up assets for him, especially when he'd only be a 3 month rental and might not make a difference. Howard isn't an option you go after to be an upgrade on back-up. If you bring in Howard, you're bringing him in to play. Think you only bring in someone to take over the #1 if Rittich completely falls apart. If that happens, also think you look to other options with bigger upside and that might have longer term than Howard. Just my thoughts on how they SHOULD be approaching it though--this is the same organization that thought giving a 34 year old Mike Smith a 3 year, 4.5 mil contract was a good idea.