SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All In

Créé par: Acegamer
Équipe: 2018-19 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 5 févr. 2019
Publié: 5 févr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Conditional on Stone signing long term. Can’t trade Urho for nothing.
Transactions
OTT
  1. Krug, Torey
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $74 885 668 $774 000 $2 807 500 $4 614 332 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
789 167 $789 167 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 févr. 2019 à 16 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
w h y d o p e o p l e w a n t t o t r a d e k r u g s o b a d l y
6 févr. 2019 à 9 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: shmoeman
w h y d o p e o p l e w a n t t o t r a d e k r u g s o b a d l y


Krug is the most valuable and most tradeable asset BOS has. Removing Krug from the backend actually improves the D quality in the Bruins own end. People get hung up on Krug's point production, and it is impressive. But, because Krug is a quality player, BOS can expect a quality return. Adding a point producing winger starts to balance out the scoring between the top two lines. I don't think BOS makes it out of the first round with their current scoring distribution. They might not even get into the playoffs. By adding a winger to the second line you improve the output of DK46 as well. Krug also has a team friendly deal at the moment, so any team taking him on is not getting solely a rental, nor are they getting a player who is a cap albatross. BOS is not going to have the cap space to resign Krug at the number he will command after next off season because of the young guys who will be coming due.

That's my opinion.
Bruins04 et Acegamer a aimé ceci.
6 févr. 2019 à 15 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: mattyb929
Krug is the most valuable and most tradeable asset BOS has. Removing Krug from the backend actually improves the D quality in the Bruins own end. People get hung up on Krug's point production, and it is impressive. But, because Krug is a quality player, BOS can expect a quality return. Adding a point producing winger starts to balance out the scoring between the top two lines. I don't think BOS makes it out of the first round with their current scoring distribution. They might not even get into the playoffs. By adding a winger to the second line you improve the output of DK46 as well. Krug also has a team friendly deal at the moment, so any team taking him on is not getting solely a rental, nor are they getting a player who is a cap albatross. BOS is not going to have the cap space to resign Krug at the number he will command after next off season because of the young guys who will be coming due.

That's my opinion.


Listen I get that it balances out your scoring but getting rid of Krug really hurts your PP, hes a top 3 PP QB in the league. I love Gryz and Mcavoy but neither can come close to replacing him on the PP. This trade definetly makes them a better team but youre also giving up your best replacement for Krug when hes probably going to have to leave bc of a big pay raise. I can see them trading Krug in the offseason MAYBE but not now
7 févr. 2019 à 2 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Love this addition by subtraction getting rid of Krug and adding real pieces hate the first and vaak but gotta give to get real chance to win now. Won't happen cause of the risk though but we can dream
7 févr. 2019 à 7 h 25
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,270
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Krug is consistently a minus defenseman. Did you watch the game last night as well. In overtime he stayed out way too long. He had an opportunity to change and a player was starting to come over the bench to sub for him and he didn’t sub. Instead he tried to get into the play in the rangers zone and because he was so gassed the rangers got a breakaway. He is a defensive liability. Plus everything that MattyB said.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage