SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

He is a frustrating individual

Créé par: noobmaster69
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2019
Publié: 15 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Two teams in need of a shake up
Transactions
TOR
  1. Nurse, Darnell
  2. Rattie, Ty
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $69 461 111 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $10 038 889 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 277 778 $10 277 778 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. 2019 à 7 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
I agree. Though I wonder what your thoughts on Matthews even strength defensive struggles are. He’s been almost as bad as Gardiner.
Fignn a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 7 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
I agree. Though I wonder what your thoughts on Matthews even strength defensive struggles are. He’s been almost as bad as Gardiner.


Wasn't really the point of the post, was just to garner a discussion on if they should trade him or keep as an "own rental". But I do agree, Matthews indeed has defensive struggles himself, and when the goals dry up that fact always seems to get amplified. Although every player has defensive responsibilities and would be nice if Matthews was better defensively, his role on this team is not to keep the puck out of the net, but rather to drive the play to the other end of the ice where he doesn't need to worry about defense, while Gardner as a D Man, is always involved in the defensive side of the play, and when you make blunders they unfortunately really stand out.
NucksFanForLife et Fignn a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 9 h 25
#3
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 8,006
Mentions "j'aime": 2,595
Someone thinks Gardiner is better than Nurse....Maybe a Nylander and Gard for Nurse, Rattie and a pick
15 janv. 2019 à 11 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 808
Mentions "j'aime": 125
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
I agree. Though I wonder what your thoughts on Matthews even strength defensive struggles are. He’s been almost as bad as Gardiner.


one has been in the league for 2 years and still learning the other been in for 8 and seem to be doing it on a regular basis. I don't think you can compare the two.
15 janv. 2019 à 11 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Fignn
one has been in the league for 2 years and still learning the other been in for 8 and seem to be doing it on a regular basis. I don't think you can compare the two.


It's 3 and 8, but people beat up Gardiner as if it's his job to be a defensive defenseman. That's just not who he is. He's slightly below average defensively and way above average offensively. Karlsson struggles defensively at times. So does Ristolainen. And Klingberg. And Krug. You get the point. Nobody is super upset with them because they aren't on the Leafs. Hainsey, on the other hand, is only an average third pairing guy. He needs to go or be replaced. People say Hainsey and Gardiner are giveaway machines. Yet Reilly gives away more pucks then they do. He also allows far more GA/60 than any other D except for Dermott, the other most highly touted Leaf D. Basically, I think fans degrade Gardiner too much without realizing that Reilly is playing in his role now and he's being used in a way that he's never been used in before. He'd be a beast on a team like Vancouver and Montreal who have an abundance of D to grind out the hard minutes for him.
Goulet a aimé ceci.
15 janv. 2019 à 16 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 6
If you honestly believe that is a fair trade, then you may not be that bright. If Dubas can pull this off, I would eat my underwear but this is about as realistic as the Sens winning the cup this year.
15 janv. 2019 à 17 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 808
Mentions "j'aime": 125
Quoting: NucksFanForLife
It's 3 and 8, but people beat up Gardiner as if it's his job to be a defensive defenseman. That's just not who he is. He's slightly below average defensively and way above average offensively. Karlsson struggles defensively at times. So does Ristolainen. And Klingberg. And Krug. You get the point. Nobody is super upset with them because they aren't on the Leafs. Hainsey, on the other hand, is only an average third pairing guy. He needs to go or be replaced. People say Hainsey and Gardiner are giveaway machines. Yet Reilly gives away more pucks then they do. He also allows far more GA/60 than any other D except for Dermott, the other most highly touted Leaf D. Basically, I think fans degrade Gardiner too much without realizing that Reilly is playing in his role now and he's being used in a way that he's never been used in before. He'd be a beast on a team like Vancouver and Montreal who have an abundance of D to grind out the hard minutes for him.


Montreal and Vancouver can have him. Gardner give away always end in goals. Riely is playing top minutes against teams top line. Yet it’s Gardner mistakes that are noticed we can’t all be wrong.
NucksFanForLife a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage