SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Top 10 Each Position

Créé par: kopiino
Équipe: 2018-19 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 4 janv. 2019
Publié: 4 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goalie order probably slightly off, but its a mix of those 10.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
6679 500 000 $362 859 023 $0 $4 550 000 $-283 359 023 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 766 667 $4 766 667 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 725 000 $5 725 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
7 425 000 $7 425 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 20
#51
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: kopiino
Couts lacked any help playing as the 2C before Giroux shifted to his wing. He's a fantastic two-way center and put up career numbers last season. He's slowed down points-wise this season, yes, but his defensive game is improving and is enough to make him better than a Kuzy or Eichel


Oh I don't know, maybe because he's a top 5 two way center and is elite both offensively and defensively
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 20
#52
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: kopiino
https://ibb.co/YZ91Fhk
Tell me again how he's better than Gallagher?
I'd like to see some further proof of your claims please.
@mhockey91 you take a look as well


I’m not wasting my time arguing over Gallagher vs Rantenen haha. Corsi is a great tool to compare players, but it’s not the be all end all solution. If you seriously think Gallagher is better than rantenen, kessel etc, you gotta quit reading all these charts and watch some games
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 20
#53
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Lmao what are you saying? Kessel is amazing. Not as great as rantenen, but still a top, elite winger in this league


Kessel isnt a top 10 winger. That's what I'm saying. I made a mistake in the team and am admitting to it
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 21
#54
BeastMode5515
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,538
Mentions "j'aime": 416
Quoting: wojme
I mean there better be. HE'S THAT GOOD. He's better than barkov and couturier.


Defense exists, y’know. You just listed two top 5 two way forwards in the league. Even then Barkov and Couturier produce at elite rates that Eichel just hasn’t shown until now. Give it time and maybe he can squeak in there. Just not now.
JayBeagleFanAccount a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 21
#55
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,142
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: moli92
take marner away from tavares and hes a 60-70 point winger, yet hes 8th? whats your point?


Marner could carry his own line when Rantanen could not.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 21
#56
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: moli92
he's easily better than gallagher, dadonov, arvidsson.

arguably better than a couple more you have above him


Let me guess, just because he's 2nd in the league in points, that automatically makes him better?
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 22
#57
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: wojme
I mean there better be. HE'S THAT GOOD. He's better than barkov and couturier.


Again, comparing Eichel to TWO elite two-ways. Not happening
BeastMode5515 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 23
#58
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,441
Mentions "j'aime": 6,062
Quoting: BeastMode5515
I highly doubt it at this point. Also Marner’s defense and play driving and considerably superiors to Rantanen’s.


according to what? I would say rantanen's play driving is better than marners. i would also doubt that rantanen is only a 55-65 point winger without mack
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 23
#59
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: kopiino
Kessel isnt a top 10 winger. That's what I'm saying. I made a mistake in the team and am admitting to it


He is a top right 10 winger easily haha. Rantenen is just higher
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 23
#60
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,114
Mentions "j'aime": 6,278
Quoting: BeastMode5515
Defense exists, y’know. You just listed two top 5 two way forwards in the league. Even then Barkov and Couturier produce at elite rates that Eichel just hasn’t shown until now. Give it time and maybe he can squeak in there. Just not now.


Shocking that someone who isn't even in their prime yet had taken time to put to big numbers. But oh wait he was close to a ppg the past two seasons even on a bottom team in the league. Y'all are jokes
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 24
#61
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: moli92
how do you justify patrick kane at 2nd overall? looking at that same website (https://public.tableau.com/profile/bill.comeau#!/vizhome/SkaterComparisonToolv2/Dashboard1) he is worse than rantanen.


KANE DRIVES PLAYS. He plays with Toews who's slipping and puts up elite numbers. Rantanen is carried by how good MacK is alone. Kane is the equivalent to a MacK on our first line because he is the one that makes thing happen and doesnt have the other players as good as Landy/Rants
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 24
#62
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,142
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: mhockey91
I’m not wasting my time arguing over Gallagher vs Rantenen haha. Corsi is a great tool to compare players, but it’s not the be all end all solution. If you seriously think Gallagher is better than rantenen, kessel etc, you gotta quit reading all these charts and watch some games


Eye test is prone to bias. Using analytics is a much more reliable way to evaluate players rather than just watching. You have to use both, I would say 70/30 for analytics.
BeastMode5515 et kopiino a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 25
#63
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,441
Mentions "j'aime": 6,062
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Marner could carry his own line when Rantanen could not.


how do you know rantanen cant carry his own line? he has never been given the chance to drive his own line (which is fine cause he is a beast with mackinnon)
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 25
#64
BeastMode5515
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,538
Mentions "j'aime": 416
Quoting: wojme
Shocking that someone who isn't even in their prime yet had taken time to put to big numbers. But oh wait he was close to a ppg the past two seasons even on a bottom team in the league. Y'all are jokes


I’m sorry how old is Eichel? Same age as McDavid correct? That’s a forwards prime. 20-23. Not sure where you got a different impression from.

Quoting: moli92
according to what? I would say rantanen's play driving is better than marners. i would also doubt that rantanen is only a 55-65 point winger without mack


Gimme uno momento
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 25
#65
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Eye test is prone to bias. Using analytics is a much more reliable way to evaluate players rather than just watching. You have to use both, I would say 70/30 for analytics.


Eye test, points, and analytics. It’s a combo of all 3
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 25
#66
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,142
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: mhockey91
He is a top right 10 winger easily haha. Rantenen is just higher


Neither are top 10 wingers.
kopiino a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 26
#67
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: mhockey91
Eye test, points, and analytics. It’s a combo of all 3


Points don't determine how good a player is.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 26
#68
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,441
Mentions "j'aime": 6,062
Quoting: kopiino
KANE DRIVES PLAYS. He plays with Toews who's slipping and puts up elite numbers. Rantanen is carried by how good MacK is alone. Kane is the equivalent to a MacK on our first line because he is the one that makes thing happen and doesnt have the other players as good as Landy/Rants


rantanen drives plays too. how do you justify gallagher over rantanen with your chart then ignore the chart when i use it for my argument?
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 27
#69
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
Neither are top 10 wingers.


They easily are haha. Kessel had 91 points last year, is close to 90 Point pace this year, and has been lethal in Pens back to back cup runs. Not even including all his sucesss on the leafs. Don’t even need to speak about how good rantenen is
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 27
#70
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: PenGoater99
Points don't determine how good a player is.


Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 28
#71
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Who knew one simple post would cause so many arguments
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 28
#72
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,142
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: moli92
rantanen drives plays too. how do you justify gallagher over rantanen with your chart then ignore the chart when i use it for my argument?


Gallagher crushes Rantanen in xGA, relTM XG%, relTM CF%, CF%, and he does it with a significantly lower QoT.
BeastMode5515 a aimé ceci.
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 29
#73
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,142
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: mhockey91
Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha


so Rantanen is the 2nd best player in the league?
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 30
#74
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,923
Mentions "j'aime": 6,983
Quoting: JayBeagleFanAccount
so Rantanen is the 2nd best player in the league?


No of course not, like I said you use a combo of 3 methods. He’s certainly a top 10 RW tho
5 janv. 2019 à 0 h 30
#75
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: mhockey91
Yeah it’s a pretty damn good indication aha


Um no, it's not. Prime example: Mikko Rantanen
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage