SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2019-20

Créé par: kopiino
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 déc. 2018
Publié: 14 déc. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Anisimov getting traded for Danault is very unlikely, but I decided to go with this option instead of going out and signing Duchene/Dzingel like all other 2019-20 teams. Duchene, to me, is probably out of the picture for us anyways, since his original reason to go to Ottawa was to win (lol), I doubt he'd want to come to a team who is likely to finish bottom-5 in the league.

The defense is very open for next season as well, with Mitchell and Boqvist, in my opinion, the most ready to play, with Krys and Beaudin also having a shot. I think only 2 at most make the team next season. Boqvist will more than likely be one of them, and then it's either gonna be between Mitchell and Beaudin.

<3
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3827 875 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
1975 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 100 000 $
1925 000 $
21 300 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
69 500 000 $
1875 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Manning, Brandon
Détails additionnels:
Trade him to anyone who wants him, really.
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Vatrano, Frank
FLA
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
4.
MTL
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
5.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
6.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DET)
DET
  1. Sikura, Dylan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de DET
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $63 986 336 $0 $6 740 000 $19 013 664 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
827 875 $827 875 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
875 000 $875 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 déc. 2018 à 1 h 1
#1
bigbig nerd big
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 12
Mentions "j'aime": 6
0.
14 déc. 2018 à 8 h 20
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,835
Mentions "j'aime": 10,044
Here's the hard part for me with the defense. Chad Krys...185 lbs Ian MItchel...173 lbs Nicolas Beaudin...176 lbs Adam Boqvist...181 lbs. None of them taller than 7'. Yes, I get that they're all young and each of them can put on some weight themselves, but it doesn't happen over night. I don't think we're going to get fair trade value for Murphy so I'd just keep him. He can play opposite one of the younger guys. Murphy doesn't play LD a ton, but he's more likely to play opposite side than Seabrook. I just don't see a rebuild happening overnight...even if we do sign Panarin.
14 déc. 2018 à 10 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: exo2769
Here's the hard part for me with the defense. Chad Krys...185 lbs Ian MItchel...173 lbs Nicolas Beaudin...176 lbs Adam Boqvist...181 lbs. None of them taller than 7'. Yes, I get that they're all young and each of them can put on some weight themselves, but it doesn't happen over night. I don't think we're going to get fair trade value for Murphy so I'd just keep him. He can play opposite one of the younger guys. Murphy doesn't play LD a ton, but he's more likely to play opposite side than Seabrook. I just don't see a rebuild happening overnight...even if we do sign Panarin.


I think we just let the kids play. Murphy is good, yes, but I don’t think he’s the guy we have to mentor them. I know the D on my team here is off, but I think we should trade Murphy for either a 3rd liner or a Top 6 LHD. Boqvist and Mitchell have to be starting, at least at the beginning of next season, for me. I was looking over some names and Edler was one that I thought could potentially play at 2LD with one of the two. This defense is a mess, but somehow in a good way. There’s much better ways to go about it than what I know, but we’ll see.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage