SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A better Chicago Black Hawks team

Créé par: S8118
Équipe: 2018-19 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 déc. 2018
Publié: 12 déc. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1. Getting younger 2. duping Seabrooks contract 3. Adding depth 4. making space for a top free agent, may look at getting Panarin 5. No longer have like 9 D eating up cap and roster space 6. Hopefully moving enough things around to create some success
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Gauthier, Frédérik
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (STL)
TOR
  1. Forsling, Gustav
  2. Saad, Brandon
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $55 833 460 $1 232 500 $5 957 500 $23 666 540 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 937 500 $2 937 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
706 666 $706 666 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 déc. 2018 à 8 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 892
Mentions "j'aime": 301
You’ll need to trade Hagel to get Kap, and if Ottawa gets Seabrook, you’ll have to take Ryan. I’d personally keep Hagel, maybe you haven’t followed him much but he is lighting up the WHL and is an A prospect with top line potential. Getting Ryan isn’t bad, he can still play in the top nine and score 40+ points a year. You’ll get a pretty good return from Saad, but not from Toronto. You’ll need to trade him to a team without any cap problems like New Jersey, Buffalo, or Colorado. Nice ideas though.
12 déc. 2018 à 9 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
S8118
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Noted, these are indeed some good thoughts. I had never really herd of Hagel, I only really follow Rockford and the Hawks.
12 déc. 2018 à 9 h 25
#3
Chewbacca88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,184
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: S8118
Noted, these are indeed some good thoughts. I had never really herd of Hagel, I only really follow Rockford and the Hawks.


Same here, friend. I try to keep up with Boqvist but other than that I focus on the professional teams. Do you guys think Hagel will make the team next year? If so, what about Entwistle, Sikura, and Ejdsell?
12 déc. 2018 à 9 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
S8118
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 9
I really couldn't say, I don't think any of them are ready yet. I don't think we'll have a clear look until training camp next year, the summer can make a big difference in a player. I doubt Boqvist will be ready and I'm not sure Ejdsell will ever take a secure spot on the roster, Sikura could but I think he's still a little under developed for the NHL level, I'd say he plays like, 20-30 games next year. I don't really have any thoughts on Entwistle.
12 déc. 2018 à 11 h 18
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: CrazyK04
Same here, friend. I try to keep up with Boqvist but other than that I focus on the professional teams. Do you guys think Hagel will make the team next year? If so, what about Entwistle, Sikura, and Ejdsell?


I think Hagel needs to be tested in the AHL first. He's tearing it up in the WHL but we've seen so many prospects tear it up in juniors but struggle against pro competition. Would love it if he turned into a surprise gem. Sikura should be given a chance this year after the trade deadline. I'd like to give Ejdsell a chance too because I think we need to find out if he's got game or not. My biggest concern with him is his skating and we're already a pretty slow team. I like Entwistle and would love to watch him in the WJC if he makes Canada's team, but I think it might be a stretch. I like his potential but he needs more time to develop.
12 déc. 2018 à 11 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: ChiChief
I think Hagel needs to be tested in the AHL first. He's tearing it up in the WHL but we've seen so many prospects tear it up in juniors but struggle against pro competition. Would love it if he turned into a surprise gem. Sikura should be given a chance this year after the trade deadline. I'd like to give Ejdsell a chance too because I think we need to find out if he's got game or not. My biggest concern with him is his skating and we're already a pretty slow team. I like Entwistle and would love to watch him in the WJC if he makes Canada's team, but I think it might be a stretch. I like his potential but he needs more time to develop.


And as I was typing this they called up Sikura.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage