SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Peters Wants

Créé par: Jerry
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2018
Publié: 25 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In addition to Hanifin and Lindholm, Peters probably would like to also add Derek Ryan as 4C and have Cam Ward as an experienced backup
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
74 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1650 000 $
1650 000 $
21 250 000 $
64 500 000 $
1650 000 $
1650 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 000 $
22 250 000 $
13 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $68 517 543 $0 $1 782 500 $10 982 457 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2018 à 10 h 54
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
I like this line up , I am so unsure of what I want to see in October, Lindholm could put up a ton of points on that first line, but when he is slotted in that second line that is a defensively dominant line! I also worry about Chuky dragging Johnny into more scrums than he would like to see. I think that line that you have put as a first line is a great scoring line though! Not a bad problem to have,
Jerry a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2018 à 15 h 4
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
I like this line up , I am so unsure of what I want to see in October, Lindholm could put up a ton of points on that first line, but when he is slotted in that second line that is a defensively dominant line! I also worry about Chuky dragging Johnny into more scrums than he would like to see. I think that line that you have put as a first line is a great scoring line though! Not a bad problem to have,


Tkachuk on the ice with Gaudreau might keep Tkachuk out of scrums -- the exact opposite of what you've said. He knows Johnny can't go anywhere near them, so maybe this move would have Tkachuk thinking only about production and hockey instead of the extra stuff, a la Marchand.

-------------------------

Like the Ryan and Ward signings, I think they make sense. Ward won't get an offer unless Peters really believes he's the perfect guy, which gives me plenty of confidence.

Absolutely HATE the Vanek signing. No thanks. Everyone's argument is that he's good on the PP...is that it? He's not the player he once was, and I'm not sure there's a cultural fit there. He's well known as a guy who lacks worth ethic. Don't see that aligning with what CGY is trying to build.
26 juin 2018 à 21 h 17
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 76
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Vanderm
Tkachuk on the ice with Gaudreau might keep Tkachuk out of scrums -- the exact opposite of what you've said. He knows Johnny can't go anywhere near them, so maybe this move would have Tkachuk thinking only about production and hockey instead of the extra stuff, a la Marchand.

-------------------------

Like the Ryan and Ward signings, I think they make sense. Ward won't get an offer unless Peters really believes he's the perfect guy, which gives me plenty of confidence.

Absolutely HATE the Vanek signing. No thanks. Everyone's argument is that he's good on the PP...is that it? He's not the player he once was, and I'm not sure there's a cultural fit there. He's well known as a guy who lacks worth ethic. Don't see that aligning with what CGY is trying to build.


I agree with everything you have said. Vanek is a wild card but could be a good depth winger but there are a lot of different guys that can fit that role too
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage