SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Else To Fix The Flames

Créé par: ekpaul87
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2018
Publié: 25 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Flames need more scoring depth, but probably can't afford to give a long term deal to a JVR or James Neal, so instead they could flip Stone for Boedker and sign a secondary UFA in Riley Nash.

The forward group here gives a lot of flexibility to move guys up and down the lineup as they get hot/struggle, and has Spencer Foo in the minors as a callup option.

On D, the top 4 is pretty set, but Kulak, Pateryn and Andersson can battle it out for the bottom pairing, and any of the three can move up to top 4 to cover injuries as needed.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 000 000 $
24 000 000 $
21 900 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Boedker, Mikkel
Détails additionnels:
Ottawa saves a bit of money and gets more incentive for Mark Stone to stay.
OTT
  1. Stone, Michael
Détails additionnels:
Calgary adds another guy who can play up and down the lineup and chip in a few goals. Both sides dump a bad contract for a bad contract.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $68 547 543 $0 $1 002 500 $10 952 457 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
705 000 $705 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juin 2018 à 14 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 618
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Calgary wants to get out from under this money. Boedker makes the situation worse for them so they probably pass.
25 juin 2018 à 14 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 894
Mentions "j'aime": 195
Quoting: claytron8000
Calgary wants to get out from under this money. Boedker makes the situation worse for them so they probably pass.


Which is a good idea in theory if you can move Stone for picks, but I don't see that happening, and Boedker fills a more useful role for the same length of time, and basically the same money.
25 juin 2018 à 14 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Boedker won't be coming to CGY with that $4M cap hit unless Frolik isn't around with his $4.3M cap hit. Next year is fine, but gets tight with the new contracts.

Lindholm will get $4.5-$5M without a doubt. Anything less and Treliving and Peters are working serious magic. Could see Lindholm and Hanifin doing matching $5M x 6 year deals.

I pulled comparables for both players in this post: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/747430

---------------------

Would love Riley Nash, but he'll catch $3M+ from someone.
Love Khudobin but he'll probably stay in BOS somehow. Bernier, Hutton, Ward would be my 3 guys to focus on in that case.
Pateryn at that price/term would be a fantastic Stone replacement.
25 juin 2018 à 14 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 618
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: Vanderm
Boedker won't be coming to CGY with that $4M cap hit unless Frolik isn't around with his $4.3M cap hit. Next year is fine, but gets tight with the new contracts.

Lindholm will get $4.5-$5M without a doubt. Anything less and Treliving and Peters are working serious magic. Could see Lindholm and Hanifin doing matching $5M x 6 year deals.

I pulled comparables for both players in this post: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/747430

---------------------

Would love Riley Nash, but he'll catch $3M+ from someone.
Love Khudobin but he'll probably stay in BOS somehow. Bernier, Hutton, Ward would be my 3 guys to focus on in that case.
Pateryn at that price/term would be a fantastic Stone replacement.


Frolik is much more effective than Boedker at this point. The 3M line is one of the most effective 2 way lines in hockey right now.
25 juin 2018 à 14 h 55
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,415
Mentions "j'aime": 9,111
I’d give you Okposo for Frolik and Bennett
25 juin 2018 à 15 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: claytron8000
Frolik is much more effective than Boedker at this point. The 3M line is one of the most effective 2 way lines in hockey right now.


That's not what I'm implying. I agree.

The point is that CGY can't have a whack of $4M+ guys on the roster. Especially in a 3rd line role. Bennett and Jankowski will both be cemented on that line this year, so CGY would do well to find the optimal RW for their chemistry. Maybe it's an internal guy like Foo; maybe it's a cheap UFA like Czarnik.
25 juin 2018 à 15 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: Shibbal18
I’d give you Okposo for Frolik and Bennett


No dice. With Okposo's contract, and injury history, CGY isn't moving a key guy from one of the best 2nd lines in the league for a higher cap hit and same-aged player. And definitely not adding Bennett to boot.
25 juin 2018 à 15 h 51
#8
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,415
Mentions "j'aime": 9,111
Quoting: Vanderm
No dice. With Okposo's contract, and injury history, CGY isn't moving a key guy from one of the best 2nd lines in the league for a higher cap hit and same-aged player. And definitely not adding Bennett to boot.
looks like Frolik is on the 3rd line and Bennett is on the 4th. Your overselling Okposo’s injury history. He had one big problem at the end of the prior season and it was his doctors fault not his
25 juin 2018 à 19 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: Shibbal18
looks like Frolik is on the 3rd line and Bennett is on the 4th. Your overselling Okposo’s injury history. He had one big problem at the end of the prior season and it was his doctors fault not his


OK, good to know on the injury front. It all seemed quite bad when I was following via media at the time.

Issue is, Frolik and Okposo have very similar career production anyways. Frolik is cheaper by $1.7M. Frolik already works well on 2nd line with Backlund and Tkachuk (together, they were one of the top possession lines in the league last year; certainly one of the most effective 2nd lines, great for tough matchups). Same age as Okposo. And you're trying to convince Treliving to give you Bennett on top of that?

And I haven't even referenced the 5 years remaining on Okposo's big contract. Or the Modified NTC that will really hurt the Flames come Seattle expansion time.

That all adds up to a straightforward, "no thanks". Treliving wouldn't do Okposo for Frolik in a 1-for-1.
ekpaul87 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2018 à 10 h 15
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 894
Mentions "j'aime": 195
Quoting: Shibbal18
looks like Frolik is on the 3rd line and Bennett is on the 4th. Your overselling Okposo’s injury history. He had one big problem at the end of the prior season and it was his doctors fault not his


Frolik and Bennett are on the 3rd and 4th because I was trying to balance the lines out a bit. They'll almost definitely be 2nd and 3rd.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage