SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pittsburgh Penguins 18-19 Roster

Créé par: pittsburgh_6687
Équipe: 2018-19 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2018
Publié: 16 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
11 800 000 $
1925 000 $
1925 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 250 000 $
76 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2018 (DAL)
2.
PIT
  1. Kempe, Adrian
  2. Martinez, Alec
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (LAK)
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de DET
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de DAL
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2280 000 000 $77 286 559 $0 $132 500 $2 713 441 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 5
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 4
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 juin 2018 à 14 h 11
#1
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Modifié 16 juin 2018 à 14 h 17
First of all, Pens won't trade Phil next season, specially in such trade. He worths much more than a top 6 d-man, a good young player who has a upside to be nothing more than a middle line player and a 2nd rd pick.

I'm sure that when JR trade Phil, it'd be for more than that and he'll ask (and get) a 1st rd pick.

Second, no way that any team trade for Hagelin without at least 1M retaining salary.

And finally, whatta hell do u thinking when u trade a much better player like Phil to sign JvR for almost the same salary for 7 years!?!? We're in a "win now mode" and the terms for JvR are terrible. Specially because of the lengh of his contract and the fact u traded Phil to sign him. That makes no sense at all, man.

Try again.
16 juin 2018 à 14 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Willian_Cardoso et Jake_H a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2018 à 14 h 48
#3
Démarrer sujet
pittsburgh_6687
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
We won't need to retain any money on Hagelin because he's in the final year of his deal. We won the back-to-back cups because our 2 best players and our depth players were better than anyone else. Kessel isn't a a necessity, he is a luxury. If we can acquire a 3 or 4 type dman and young player that is already better than Sheary, with solid upsid, then we would be just as good as this year's team. With the addition cap space we create in these trades we can sign a 35+ goal score and a game-breaking player like Calvert who will do what Hagelin was supposed to be doing for the past 2 years.
16 juin 2018 à 15 h 4
#4
Let's go Pens!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 382
Quoting: pittsburgh_6687
We won't need to retain any money on Hagelin because he's in the final year of his deal. We won the back-to-back cups because our 2 best players and our depth players were better than anyone else. Kessel isn't a a necessity, he is a luxury. If we can acquire a 3 or 4 type dman and young player that is already better than Sheary, with solid upsid, then we would be just as good as this year's team. With the addition cap space we create in these trades we can sign a 35+ goal score and a game-breaking player like Calvert who will do what Hagelin was supposed to be doing for the past 2 years.


You can't convince me with any argument that we need to trade Phil to make those bad moves. Sorry.
16 juin 2018 à 15 h 9
#5
Démarrer sujet
pittsburgh_6687
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Even strength goals. Kessel(22g), Sheary(16g), Hagelin(9g), Kuhnhackl(2g) and Ruhwedel+Oleksiak(5g) = (54g)
Vs.
Van Riemsdyk(25g), Sprong(projected)(13g), Kempe(15g),
Calvert(6g) and Martinez(7g) = (66g)
16 juin 2018 à 15 h 58
#6
AHL Emissary
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 352
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: pittsburgh_6687
Even strength goals. Kessel(22g), Sheary(16g), Hagelin(9g), Kuhnhackl(2g) and Ruhwedel+Oleksiak(5g) = (54g)
Vs.
Van Riemsdyk(25g), Sprong(projected)(13g), Kempe(15g),
Calvert(6g) and Martinez(7g) = (66g)


Sprong will be in the NHL regardles of the moves you made, so adding his scoring to one side and not the other is disingenuous at best and stupid at worst. Besides, I don't know how you can call a scoring machine like Kessel a luxury, and anyone who thinks Matt Calvert is a game breaker can't be taken seriously.
scottclev a aimé ceci.
16 juin 2018 à 16 h 7
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 10
16 juin 2018 à 16 h 8
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 149
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Besides, LA is getting hosed in that trade.
16 juin 2018 à 16 h 38
#9
Démarrer sujet
pittsburgh_6687
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Someone who can gets breakaway on consistent basis is a game-breaker because they get those great looks. Kessel is not a scoring machine. Not even close. Kessel is such a good player. But also has a ton of deficiencies. Nothing wrong with that but I think we can would be better off without him IF we can sign Van Riemsdyk or Neal.
16 juin 2018 à 16 h 40
#10
Démarrer sujet
pittsburgh_6687
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I was comparing players that I got rid to the players that take their spots in the lineup. Sprong wasn't in the lineup last year. Just like Van Riemsdyk and Martinez weren't in the lineup last year.
16 juin 2018 à 16 h 41
#11
Démarrer sujet
pittsburgh_6687
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Wo cares what Rutherford said in a press conference. That's what he's supposed to say.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage