SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fire Sale! Everyone must go!

Créé par: nevalent
Équipe: 2018-19 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 9 juin 2018
Publié: 10 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What this team looks like if all the valuable trade chips get moved. For the record, I wouldn’t draft Brady Tkachuk, but I have zero doubt that Pierre Dorion will.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
17 500 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
24 000 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Tkachuk, Brady
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Mantha, Ryan
  2. Russell, Kris
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Russell is the cap dump to accommodate Hoffman’s contract and gets Ottawa the 3rd rounder.
2.
OTT
  1. Rask, Victor
  2. Roy, Nicolas
  3. Wesley, Josh
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (CAR)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
Ottawa gets volume on the trade of Duchesne to try to avoid fan backlash. Rask included to reduce costs.
3.
OTT
  1. Seney, Brett
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Jersey acquires Smith as a third line centre. With no cap issues, no cap dump is required, but the return is suspect
4.
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Negotiating rights to D Miller, C.
Negotiating rights to LW Carrier, W.

Ottawa and Vegas culminate the trade rumoured at the 2018 trade deadline. Vegas limits their expenditure by taking on Ryan’s contract. Move two RFAs whose raises are eaten up by the cost of Ryan’s deal.
5.
OTT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
Claesson provides low cost option for Chicago’s defence, like Oesterle last season.
CHI
    Negotiating rights to D Claesson, F.
    6.
    OTT
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (OTT)
    Détails additionnels:
    Negotiating rights to D Siemens, D.

    Ottawa pays a hefty price to get back its 2019 1st rounder. Siemens included to balance contract slots.
    COL
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (OTT)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
    Détails additionnels:
    Negotiating rights to D Ceci, C.
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2018
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYR
    2019
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CGY
    2020
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2380 000 000 $51 401 666 $0 $1 920 000 $28 598 334 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Tkachuk, Brady
    925 000 $925 000 $
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance710 000 $$710K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    650 000 $650 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    4 650 000 $4 650 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    10 juin 2018 à 20 h 34
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Cody Ceci and a couple 2nd round picks is not going to get the 1st round pick back. Ceci is pretty awful to painfully average, if thats the "high price to pay" you are going to have to come up with something much more valuable
    nevalent a aimé ceci.
    10 juin 2018 à 20 h 42
    #2
    Sens4life
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 805
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Like's that is an awful EK trade..the rest are good tho
    nevalent a aimé ceci.
    11 juin 2018 à 9 h 3
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 150
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Quoting: Sens4life
    Like's that is an awful EK trade..the rest are good tho


    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/719475 What do you think of mine?
    11 juin 2018 à 10 h 28
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 17
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: coga16
    Cody Ceci and a couple 2nd round picks is not going to get the 1st round pick back. Ceci is pretty awful to painfully average, if thats the "high price to pay" you are going to have to come up with something much more valuable


    Agreed, but I was looking at it from these perspectives:
    1) it seems from the outside that NHL GMs tend to do each other favours as a sort of self-preservation tactic;

    2) "Good hockey men" seem to think Ceci is a good player (even if I've never understood how or why they would);

    3) I'm thinking this trade happens at the 2018 draft and Colorado would have to make the choice whether to hang onto the first rounder which, with the volatility that parity in the NHL brings, could be anywhere from #1 overall to a non-lottery pick (remember, we're talking about the perspective of "good hockey men" whose attitudes towards these things seem to be suspect at best), or to take an established NHL right-shot, minute-munching defenseman + two relatively high draft picks from a boom-and-bust team.
    11 juin 2018 à 10 h 32
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 17
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: Sens4life
    Like's that is an awful EK trade..the rest are good tho


    Yes, it's terrible. But, I don't think that Vegas is willing to move any of their prospects, so I figure the only options that Dorion would have to make this trade is to get serviceable young players that Vegas can't afford to keep anyway, a first round pick, and the money savings they'd get from dumping Ryan's contract. The last of those might be the most important from Melnyk's warped perspective. I wasn't looking at this from the perspective of what I'd do, but what the organization is likely to do.
    11 juin 2018 à 10 h 35
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: nevalent
    Agreed, but I was looking at it from these perspectives:
    1) it seems from the outside that NHL GMs tend to do each other favours as a sort of self-preservation tactic;

    2) "Good hockey men" seem to think Ceci is a good player (even if I've never understood how or why they would);

    3) I'm thinking this trade happens at the 2018 draft and Colorado would have to make the choice whether to hang onto the first rounder which, with the volatility that parity in the NHL brings, could be anywhere from #1 overall to a non-lottery pick (remember, we're talking about the perspective of "good hockey men" whose attitudes towards these things seem to be suspect at best), or to take an established NHL right-shot, minute-munching defenseman + two relatively high draft picks from a boom-and-bust team.


    I dont think Sakic is going to be doing anyone any favours and Avs have a few analytic heavy front office now that influence a lot of their moves. Ceci would have red flags all over the place

    Avs take the risk in Sens being an awful team again, that roster isnt deep enough and with their 37 year old goalie coming off a major injury and bad back up in Condon. That team can easily be a dumpster fire especially if they move EK.

    I dont see many trades that would tempt them to move that pick back to the Sens
    11 juin 2018 à 16 h 44
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 17
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Quoting: coga16
    I dont think Sakic is going to be doing anyone any favours and Avs have a few analytic heavy front office now that influence a lot of their moves. Ceci would have red flags all over the place

    Avs take the risk in Sens being an awful team again, that roster isnt deep enough and with their 37 year old goalie coming off a major injury and bad back up in Condon. That team can easily be a dumpster fire especially if they move EK.

    I dont see many trades that would tempt them to move that pick back to the Sens


    Oh, that's good to hear from Colorado's perspective. Some of that team's past moves made me think Sakic might still be someone that could be duped into thinking Ceci was worth something. I still think that Ottawa is going to make a hard pitch to get that pick back, but it sounds like it will take a king's ransom to do so, as it should.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage