SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NEW 5 Trades plus UFA's (only 4 now) - Dream team for next season

Créé par: rbcf
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 9 juin 2018
Publié: 9 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just some minor tweaks based on input to the other one. Keep Bennett and Frolik. Lose Ferland.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 900 000 $
43 500 000 $
2900 000 $
1775 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
    Rights to Grubauer
    WSH
    1. Kylington, Oliver
    2. Lazar, Curtis
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (FLA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Rights to Rittich
    2.
    PIT
    1. Brodie, TJ
    2. Dubé, Dillon
    Détails additionnels:
    Rights to Adam Fox
    3.
    CGY
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (SJS)
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2018 (ANA)
    4.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2018
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de ANA
    2019
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CAR
    2020
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CGY
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 000 000 $70 727 142 $0 $1 610 000 $11 272 858 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    705 000 $705 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    UFA
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    710 000 $710 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG
    UFA - 3
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    9 juin 2018 à 18 h 2
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 37
    Mentions "j'aime": 1
    I would say drop the Kessel trade and the Oreilly trade. I would hate to see Calgary give up that much for a second line centre when they already have Backlund and Jankowski as a great 3rd line centre. The Kessel trade is fine but a) I don't know if CGY is sending enough value, and b) I don't know if it's even necessary. Phil is great but also defense is such a strength for the flames, and Gio is getting older so Brodie is someone I'd want to keep around. If you're signing Neal I don't think another RW is necessary
    9 juin 2018 à 18 h 2
    #2
    I put math in hockey
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 624
    Mentions "j'aime": 167
    Love the aggression. Doesn't exactly build a perennial contender, but it's an awesome win-now lineup. I'm not sure if the Pens would take that deal for Kessel (IMO they shouldn't, but I tend to value Kessel more than most.) Keeps the core together, gets under the cap. Only issues I have are:
    1) Giordano should be on PK1, he's one of the best defensive defensemen in the game.
    2) You should be going 4F 1D for your PP, it's almost always more effective.
    These are minor usage concerns, just to make it a bit more optimal.
    The lineup's also going to have some issues next year as contracts start expiring, but oh man is this a great, fun lineup. I approve.
    rbcf a aimé ceci.
    9 juin 2018 à 18 h 5
    #3
    I put math in hockey
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 624
    Mentions "j'aime": 167
    Quoting: MarKadMar
    I would say drop the Kessel trade and the Oreilly trade. I would hate to see Calgary give up that much for a second line centre when they already have Backlund and Jankowski as a great 3rd line centre. The Kessel trade is fine but a) I don't know if CGY is sending enough value, and b) I don't know if it's even necessary. Phil is great but also defense is such a strength for the flames, and Gio is getting older so Brodie is someone I'd want to keep around. If you're signing Neal I don't think another RW is necessary


    O'Reilly's much more of a 1B centre than a 2C. He's an incredible defensive force who also contributes a ton of offense. For most teams, I'd say he'd be their 1C, but BUF has Eichel. Kessel is one of the best scorers in the league: He's easily worth the cost on D and far outclasses Neal. Brodie is good, but he's had issues when asked to drive his own pairing. And I don't get the sense this lineup is really looking beyond next year all that much.
    TheRiddler a aimé ceci.
    9 juin 2018 à 18 h 17
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 260
    Mentions "j'aime": 13
    Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
    Love the aggression. Doesn't exactly build a perennial contender, but it's an awesome win-now lineup. I'm not sure if the Pens would take that deal for Kessel (IMO they shouldn't, but I tend to value Kessel more than most.) Keeps the core together, gets under the cap. Only issues I have are:
    1) Giordano should be on PK1, he's one of the best defensive defensemen in the game.
    2) You should be going 4F 1D for your PP, it's almost always more effective.
    These are minor usage concerns, just to make it a bit more optimal.
    The lineup's also going to have some issues next year as contracts start expiring, but oh man is this a great, fun lineup. I approve.


    Thanks for the input! Yeah I am sick of being a fringe team. Lets go all in for once. For the PP I just don't see Bennett or Frolik as good options going 4F 1D. For the PK1 line its not a huge concern as the forwards are all stars and you still have to kill off all 2 minutes... But yes they will throw their best out first so that probably should change that. For the future, Smith would go and Grubauer would take over as #1 and hopefully do well with Gillis hopefully ready. This will help to pay for Thachuks massive contract. If we need more then we can look at trading Frolik.
    The_Ultimate_Pielord a aimé ceci.
    9 juin 2018 à 18 h 23
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 260
    Mentions "j'aime": 13
    Quoting: MarKadMar
    I would say drop the Kessel trade and the Oreilly trade. I would hate to see Calgary give up that much for a second line centre when they already have Backlund and Jankowski as a great 3rd line centre. The Kessel trade is fine but a) I don't know if CGY is sending enough value, and b) I don't know if it's even necessary. Phil is great but also defense is such a strength for the flames, and Gio is getting older so Brodie is someone I'd want to keep around. If you're signing Neal I don't think another RW is necessary


    This is just for fun and what I might try and do as the GM. I feel Kessel with Gaudreau and Monahan would be dynamite as they turned Ferland into a 20 goal scorer. I think Kessel would work wonders with those 2. For O'Reilly, he is a proven Selke centre that has an amazing Corsi, puts up points without getting favorable starts and would be stellar to have 3 great proven centers moving forward. Even one of those would push us into a playoff position for next year. Both should push us into a serious contender.
    10 juin 2018 à 0 h 15
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 230
    Mentions "j'aime": 27
    Quoting: rbcf
    This is just for fun and what I might try and do as the GM. I feel Kessel with Gaudreau and Monahan would be dynamite as they turned Ferland into a 20 goal scorer. I think Kessel would work wonders with those 2. For O'Reilly, he is a proven Selke centre that has an amazing Corsi, puts up points without getting favorable starts and would be stellar to have 3 great proven centers moving forward. Even one of those would push us into a playoff position for next year. Both should push us into a serious contender.


    Not only are both the Kessel and ROR trades huge over pays, but putting Kessel with Gaudreau and Monahan would be a disaster. They are already getting killed defensively, and attacked via stick work, and who actually believes adding Kessel is going to do anything but make those aspects far worse? Better to put Kessel on another line, but then the team would have to endure Kessel’s complaints he didn’t get to play with Gaudreau.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage