SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic possiblity

Créé par: JTuckerIII
Équipe: 2018-19 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2018
Publié: 4 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1725 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 250 000 $
31 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Berglund, Patrik
  2. Blais, Samuel
  3. Schmaltz, Jordan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (STL)
2.
CAR
  1. Fitzpatrick, Evan
  2. Sobotka, Vladimír
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (STL)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2019
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2020
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 000 000 $68 959 321 $150 988 $232 500 $12 040 679 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
NTC
UFA - 3
5 725 000 $5 725 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
894 166 $894 166 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
741 667 $741 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
875 000 $875 000 $ (Bonis de performance50 000 $$50K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 3
722 500 $722 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juin 2018 à 6 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
I think the Sabres would want better prospects,
even if that means we wouldn’t get the 1st round picks
4 juin 2018 à 6 h 22
#2
Démarrer sujet
JTP3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Counter offer, Berglund, Thompson, 1st?
4 juin 2018 à 8 h 53
#3
Eichel Tower
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 4,716
Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
Five stars for wanting O'Reilly
Two "B" prospects, an over paid 3rd line center, 2018 1st (29th over all) that is nearly a 2nd and a 2019 1st that will most likely not be a lottery pick. Berglund could play 2nd line center to start the season until Mittelstadt is more comfortable in the NHL. Jordan Schmaltz may develop into a decent RHD, but he may have reached his peak performance already.
I think Botterill could better, this is very close maybe drop Jordan Schmaltz and add a 2018 2nd? That would give Botterill 4 picks among the top 45 this year, Berglund to play 2nd C, a 1st next year and a "B" prospect.
JTuckerIII a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2018 à 9 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 857
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: GMTD
Five stars for wanting O'Reilly
Two "B" prospects, an over paid 3rd line center, 2018 1st (29th over all) that is nearly a 2nd and a 2019 1st that will most likely not be a lottery pick. Berglund could play 2nd line center to start the season until Mittelstadt is more comfortable in the NHL. Jordan Schmaltz may develop into a decent RHD, but he may have reached his peak performance already.
I think Botterill could better, this is very close maybe drop Jordan Schmaltz and add a 2018 2nd? That would give Botterill 4 picks among the top 45 this year, Berglund to play 2nd C, a 1st next year and a "B" prospect.


Why do you hate ROR so much? lol
4 juin 2018 à 10 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: GMTD
Five stars for wanting O'Reilly
Two "B" prospects, an over paid 3rd line center, 2018 1st (29th over all) that is nearly a 2nd and a 2019 1st that will most likely not be a lottery pick. Berglund could play 2nd line center to start the season until Mittelstadt is more comfortable in the NHL. Jordan Schmaltz may develop into a decent RHD, but he may have reached his peak performance already.
I think Botterill could better, this is very close maybe drop Jordan Schmaltz and add a 2018 2nd? That would give Botterill 4 picks among the top 45 this year, Berglund to play 2nd C, a 1st next year and a "B" prospect.


1 star for wanting ROR. I don't want him on the team especially for 5 years at 7.5. Not worth to me. He's okay. Not going to put the Blues over the top.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2018 à 10 h 10
#6
Eichel Tower
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 4,716
Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
Quoting: BluesGetTheCup
Why do you hate ROR so much? lol


Thank you for your comment.
Because, little kids lose their teeth because they love to play the game. if you lose your love of the game get out of town.
Do you remember we were sold a bill of goods that he was a two way player. Can you tell me ONE other forward who is considered a 2 way player who only had 2 penalty minutes in a year? We were told he would bring character to the team, well he showed his character when he ran away from an auto accident. Finally, Zadorov may have been enough for him, DATM way over paid.
BluesGetTheCup a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2018 à 10 h 16
#7
Eichel Tower
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 4,716
Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
Quoting: Chopper02
1 star for wanting ROR. I don't want him on the team especially for 5 years at 7.5. Not worth to me. He's okay. Not going to put the Blues over the top.


LOL, not my post but I do see your point.
4 juin 2018 à 10 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: GMTD
LOL, not my post but I do see your point.


I know. Forgot to quote both of you lol
GMTD a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2018 à 10 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 857
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: GMTD
Thank you for your comment.
Because, little kids lose their teeth because they love to play the game. if you lose your love of the game get out of town.
Do you remember we were sold a bill of goods that he was a two way player. Can you tell me ONE other forward who is considered a 2 way player who only had 2 penalty minutes in a year? We were told he would bring character to the team, well he showed his character when he ran away from an auto accident. Finally, Zadorov may have been enough for him, DATM way over paid.


Interesting take - that's all fair I think. Though at the time I think the value for getting him made sense. A young, 1st line center has a high price. It'll be interesting to see if the Blues do go after him what the public perception of his trade value and what GMs see for him would be. It's not out of the realm of possibility to see getting Tarasenko on his wing and getting them both 75+ points.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2018 à 11 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 2
I don't think either trade is enough for those players. Both teams are looking to improve from last year, Buffalo wants out of the basement and Carolina wants to push for the playoffs. There needs to be a significant piece going to buffalo for them to bite on trading ROR. It is going to take at least 1 of Fabbri/Dunn/Kyrou/Thomas in order for them to even listen. They aren't going to take pure futures (late 1st at that), Two "meh" prospects in Blais & Schmaltz, and an average third liner.

Carolina isn't trading a 25-30 goal scorer for a 3rd line LW/C, a goalie prospect, and a 2nd. Even if he is just a one year rental. At minimum they could get a 1st and better prospect if they just hold onto him until the deadline.

Outside of that, I don't know why we would overpay Maroon to then play both Steen and Fabbri on their offsides. Steen is way better on LW than RW and putting Fabs on his off wing after being out for 1.5 years just seems like putting him at a disadvantage.

With this roster we still only have 1 RHS in the top 9 and only 2 in the entire forward lines. We need to be targeting more RHS forwards to balance this out or we are still going to be running a predictable and unproductive power play.

Adjusting the trade values, ROR/Skinner are both good targets in their own right, but the combination still leaves us unbalanced and having too many LWers and not enough RWers (even though Skinner can play some RW). I combination of ROR/Silfverberg or Tyler Johnson/Skinner helps add elements we need while balancing the LHS/RHS ratio.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage