SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks 2018-19

Créé par: Mardzy
Équipe: 2018-19 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2018
Publié: 18 mai 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ducks need to hope Perry can have a bounce back season and the kids can produce.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2940 000 $
2940 000 $
2940 000 $
2940 000 $
2940 000 $
22 500 000 $
23 750 000 $
21 650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
21 850 000 $
1650 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2278 000 000 $68 498 417 $0 $850 000 $9 501 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 8
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
794 167 $794 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2018 à 17 h 49
#1
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,834
Mentions "j'aime": 3,867
This Kevin Boyle guy must be pretty good
Mardzy a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2018 à 18 h 55
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Why would you sign Sbisa to such an awful contract. Gross. cry
21 mai 2018 à 11 h 53
#3
Go Ducks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 107
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Pretty good team, but two concerns:
1. Since Kase and Monty had breakout seasons this year, it would be better to pay a little more for long term deals since they haven't shown consistent play. If they continue this play for the two years on your contracts, they'll require a much higher salary than they would get now.

2. I'd shuffle the lines a bit. If you wanna help Steel and Terry develop, they should be put on scoring lines with good players to ease them in. A 4th line role isn't their style of play. Also, for the young prospects, it would be better to give them playing time in the minors than have them scratched as backups.
Mardzy a aimé ceci.
21 mai 2018 à 11 h 59
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
Pretty good team, but two concerns:
1. Since Kase and Monty had breakout seasons this year, it would be better to pay a little more for long term deals since they haven't shown consistent play. If they continue this play for the two years on your contracts, they'll require a much higher salary than they would get now.

2. I'd shuffle the lines a bit. If you wanna help Steel and Terry develop, they should be put on scoring lines with good players to ease them in. A 4th line role isn't their style of play. Also, for the young prospects, it would be better to give them playing time in the minors than have them scratched as backups.


I see your point, but do you want to give out multi-year deals to players with one year of relative success? How many years would you give each? To me I think bridge contracts should be given before consistent success has been shown. The reason I kept the prospects up is because there are going to be injuries, and I figure these guys will probably spend most of the year with the Ducks, but yes, makes no sense to sit in the pressbox, but couldn't they also be lost on waivers if they're sent down?
21 mai 2018 à 12 h 12
#5
Go Ducks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 107
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I can see multi year deals being a risk if it's a player in his late 20s or 30s who had a breakout year after being inconsistent for a few years prior, but with young players like Monty and Kase, it's very likely that they will continue to improve (or at least remain stagnant), so it's not too big of a gamble.

As far as waivers go, players on entry level contracts can be sent up and down without having to clear waivers for a year or two (I'm not exactly sure how the duration is determined. It might be a number of NHL games played and could vary from player to player, but waiver exemption definitely is a thing.). This allows teams to test out rookies without worrying about losing them.
21 mai 2018 à 12 h 22
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
I can see multi year deals being a risk if it's a player in his late 20s or 30s who had a breakout year after being inconsistent for a few years prior, but with young players like Monty and Kase, it's very likely that they will continue to improve (or at least remain stagnant), so it's not too big of a gamble.

As far as waivers go, players on entry level contracts can be sent up and down without having to clear waivers for a year or two (I'm not exactly sure how the duration is determined. It might be a number of NHL games played and could vary from player to player, but waiver exemption definitely is a thing.). This allows teams to test out rookies without worrying about losing them.


I understand how waivers work, Roy and Kossila's entry level deals are up, not sure they'd pass through, probaby good enough to be picked up by someone.
21 mai 2018 à 17 h 27
#7
Go Ducks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 107
Mentions "j'aime": 3
I thought you meant the new guys like Steel and Terry. Even still, most teams usually sign an extra expendable player to play as a backup, like what Derek Grant and Marcus Petterson were supposed to be last year. This way they have a backup without risking waivers. There are also emergency loans which can be used in the case of an injury, which exempt the player from waivers as long as they are returned as soon as the injured player is healthy. Roy and Kossila can be used as replacements, but will still get playing time in the AHL.
21 mai 2018 à 18 h 33
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Quoting: SirQuacksALot
I thought you meant the new guys like Steel and Terry. Even still, most teams usually sign an extra expendable player to play as a backup, like what Derek Grant and Marcus Petterson were supposed to be last year. This way they have a backup without risking waivers. There are also emergency loans which can be used in the case of an injury, which exempt the player from waivers as long as they are returned as soon as the injured player is healthy. Roy and Kossila can be used as replacements, but will still get playing time in the AHL.


I understand the 13f/7d role. Didn't realize Roy and Kossila signed entry level deals at 23 and still had a year of waiver exemption.
SirQuacksALot a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage