SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trades

Créé par: MJOHNSON1201
Équipe: 2018-19 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2018
Publié: 18 mai 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Some Players would bounce back and forth from AHL, but the Wild would have more cap room to make moves.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
31 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
22 750 000 $
2975 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Brooks, Adam
  2. Brown, Connor
  3. Liljegren, Timothy
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Olofsson, Gustav
  2. Staal, Eric
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
This could be any team that with a later round pick
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de MIN
Logo de WSH
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2578 000 000 $75 465 258 $25 000 $1 345 000 $2 534 742 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
765 000 $765 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
650 000 $650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2018 à 16 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 2,933
Mentions "j'aime": 362
leafs are looking for a centre to replace bozak and staal would be perfect but not at the cost of lijegren.
18 mai 2018 à 16 h 36
#2
Démarrer sujet
mjohnson1201
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Thanks for the reply. Who would you insert into this trade instead of Liljegren? Or maybe another pick(s)?
18 mai 2018 à 16 h 57
#3
danni04
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 1
R Smith and A Chiasson as depth signing are adequate for Wild, I like that. I'm not entirely sure about Hickey, though, almost 3M is pretty rich for 3rd pair defensmen.
If we clear the minor assets from the TOR trade, we are left with Staal for Brown and Liljegren. That is quality experienced 2nd line C for 3rd line wing and defensive prospect.
Given Staal's age, this deal seems fair to me or even maybe bit going MIN's way, but I doubt it will go through because Liljegren is a last year 1st rounder and they would want a bit more for that.
The other question is: what does this trade solve for Wild in the end? They lost their most productive player from last season, didn't clear much cap-space with the trade (1.4M) and didn't get any closer to winning the cup.
If this was first of moves to start a rebuild, then it might work, but it surely can't be left alone.
(Don't take this as a criticism of your thinking, I was just trying to point out the difficulty of the Wild situation that can't be solve with just 1 trade)
18 mai 2018 à 17 h 26
#4
Démarrer sujet
mjohnson1201
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Thanks for your reply. I don't know if the TOR trade would be my only move either, but I thought it would be a strong start. I was trying to be as realistic as possible (maybe favoring MN a little). We cant trade a handful of players with NMC or NTC ( I dont know if TOR is on E. Staal's or not).

I do not think moving Coyle is the best option, he would get much in return and has a small cap. Nino might be another option to sell, but it is hard to gauge his value with his inconsistent play. E. Staal's value is really high now and it might be the best time to cash in. I think that this move would give us more depth and give us a little cap flexibility (I currently have 5 lines and 4 sets of D).

I also kind of agree with you on Hickey. I just thought we needed a safety net if Seeler and Soucy's game goes to crap next year.

Thanks again
18 mai 2018 à 18 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 144
Take Olofsson and Liljegren out of the deal entirely and I can see the Leafs having interest! Leafs loaded with LD prospects and weak on the right side!
19 mai 2018 à 13 h 32
#6
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,219
Mentions "j'aime": 3,590
I'd do Staal for Liljegren straight up.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage