Quoting: arafay
The one thing you got wrong in your response was that Petan is not a 2nd line center. Start him with a big player (Armia) and a sniper and you will be impressed. Petan is also a great passer (God on half-wall on pp)
Perreault doesn't play center because the jets have Schiefele, Stastny, Little, and Lowry. He is not a better center than the first three and Lowry is our checking center which is a role perreault doesn't fit. Perreault would produce more than little at center but little is a great 2 -way player. The jets have used him on 4 on 4 as a center and he is great, he creates chances and is responsible on defense.
Perreault would be a great 2C on most teams, especially MTL. You wont need a top center because you will have Zadina.
If Not then?
Who should I send Petan to instead. he has 2nd line center upside
How about Armia . You hit the nail in the head for his role
And Perreault? Solid 2C
I made this trade because I thought it benefitted MTL
If Petan is a 2C, then Charles Hudon is too. Very similar players in my eyes, both are good playmakers, skilled with the puck, hard-working and good on PP, Hudon has just been able to produce more at the NHL level. If Hudon can't cut it in the Habs' top 6 as a centre, then the chances are Petan can't either.
As for Perreault, if he's truly a 2C, then why did the feel the need to acquire Stastny at the TDL and not just slot Perreault in there. Instead they are using Perreault in the lower lines as a winger, where he is good but it's really hard to sell him as a 2C when he's not even close to be considered as one in his current team.
I like what Armia brings, but we have enough 3rd line PKing wingers. Don't need another one. This is not a knock on any of the players proposed, they are just not quite what we need. We want established top 6 C's, not wild cards like Perreault and Petan.