SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NEW LINES VS. LIGHTING

Créé par: mapleleafs
Équipe: 2017-18 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 26 avr. 2018
Publié: 26 avr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de FLA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1975 000 000 $68 920 001 $0 $1 200 000 $6 079 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 6
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
872 500 $872 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
700 000 $700 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
808 750 $808 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
858 750 $858 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 avr. 2018 à 20 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Personally I think Donato should in ahead of Heinen. He's been underwhelming.
27 avr. 2018 à 7 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Chopper02
Personally I think Donato should in ahead of Heinen. He's been underwhelming.


Guess you missed Donato in game 2 then lol. Talk about underwhelming, he played 10 minutes and I can't recall a single shift or play he made. Heinen is fine and gives a 2-way game. I know he's not the sparkly new toy that Donato is, but you know at worst you'll get a 200ft effort and he wont hurt you in your own end. Can't say the same for Donato right now....in fact I retract my earlier statement, I remember him blowing coverage in game 2 that led to a goal against.
27 avr. 2018 à 7 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: ON3M4N
Guess you missed Donato in game 2 then lol. Talk about underwhelming, he played 10 minutes and I can't recall a single shift or play he made. Heinen is fine and gives a 2-way game. I know he's not the sparkly new toy that Donato is, but you know at worst you'll get a 200ft effort and he wont hurt you in your own end. Can't say the same for Donato right now....in fact I retract my earlier statement, I remember him blowing coverage in game 2 that led to a goal against.


i actually missed Game 2 altogether haha. I will say this, even given that blown play, he's still a young guy with greater offensive potential. You have to figure Hedman/Stralman will be on the Bergeron line all night so you need to create offense from somewhere. Donato can generate lots of offense and chances. Like you said, Heinen is a 200 foot player, but he doesn't have the same offensive capability. I'm just saying it wouldn't hurt to pair Krejci and Backes with a more offensive player if they plan on keeping DeBrusk with Riley Nash on the 3rd and not move him up.
27 avr. 2018 à 8 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Chopper02
i actually missed Game 2 altogether haha. I will say this, even given that blown play, he's still a young guy with greater offensive potential. You have to figure Hedman/Stralman will be on the Bergeron line all night so you need to create offense from somewhere. Donato can generate lots of offense and chances. Like you said, Heinen is a 200 foot player, but he doesn't have the same offensive capability. I'm just saying it wouldn't hurt to pair Krejci and Backes with a more offensive player if they plan on keeping DeBrusk with Riley Nash on the 3rd and not move him up.


I don't think you move DeBrusk at all. He was your best player night in and night out last series. It didn't always show on the score sheet (although game 3 was the only game he was held without a point), but he was fantastic last series. Donato is going to be a very very good player with an elite shot, but is scoring really the teams issue? Boston put up 5+ goals in 3 of the 7 games and 3+ goals in 5 of the 7 games vs TOR. Now you may see Donato in this series as I think the match-up is slightly better for him, but I wouldn't inject him in just to get him in there. I did like the heavy 3rd line that Boston played with for a game last series, but that means Donato needs to be your #2RW and I think he maybe better suited to play his natural side.

If Heinen struggles again and you put him in, I think he goes #3LW and gets some defensive mind guys like Riley and Backes to play with. The problem there is you've no neutralized Donato's speed as neither Nash nor Backes can keep up with him on the rush.
27 avr. 2018 à 8 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: ON3M4N
I don't think you move DeBrusk at all. He was your best player night in and night out last series. It didn't always show on the score sheet (although game 3 was the only game he was held without a point), but he was fantastic last series. Donato is going to be a very very good player with an elite shot, but is scoring really the teams issue? Boston put up 5+ goals in 3 of the 7 games and 3+ goals in 5 of the 7 games vs TOR. Now you may see Donato in this series as I think the match-up is slightly better for him, but I wouldn't inject him in just to get him in there. I did like the heavy 3rd line that Boston played with for a game last series, but that means Donato needs to be your #2RW and I think he maybe better suited to play his natural side.

If Heinen struggles again and you put him in, I think he goes #3LW and gets some defensive mind guys like Riley and Backes to play with. The problem there is you've no neutralized Donato's speed as neither Nash nor Backes can keep up with him on the rush.


Agreed on DeBrusk being the best player. They shouldn't move him. But Krejci isn't all that fast either. But I really do think they need his speed and offensive instincts in this series. 3+ goals a game should theoretically win you games, but if a team like Toronto can open the floodgates then you could only expect Tampa to do more damage. Maybe slide Heinen down the lineup into the 4th line wing spot to help the bottom line who has already played decently. There's always the possibility of sitting Rick Nash and not Heinen, but I doubt Cassidy does that. Obviously, this is a great problem for Boston to have right now. How about sliding Riley Nash down to 4th line center, Donato with DeBrusk on the 3rd line? There has to be a way to maximize the lineup even more.
27 avr. 2018 à 9 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Chopper02
Agreed on DeBrusk being the best player. They shouldn't move him. But Krejci isn't all that fast either. But I really do think they need his speed and offensive instincts in this series. 3+ goals a game should theoretically win you games, but if a team like Toronto can open the floodgates then you could only expect Tampa to do more damage. Maybe slide Heinen down the lineup into the 4th line wing spot to help the bottom line who has already played decently. There's always the possibility of sitting Rick Nash and not Heinen, but I doubt Cassidy does that. Obviously, this is a great problem for Boston to have right now. How about sliding Riley Nash down to 4th line center, Donato with DeBrusk on the 3rd line? There has to be a way to maximize the lineup even more.


The thing w/ TOR vs TBL is that TOR lives and dies by the stretch play and TBL doesn't. I don't think you see TBL give Boston the same fits that TBL did. Don't get me wrong, TBL can torch you in any given shift and they are insanely talented. I just think their style of attack is better suite for the B's defense then TOR was. If you really wanted to get Donato in the game, I'd look at maybe bumping Schaller for game (although he's a pretty big PK guy).

63-37-88
74-46-61
17-20-42
43-52-55

You could also consider bumping Acciari, dropping Backes to #4 (plays a similar game, just a better offensive player) and then you'd have 17-20-43 on the 3rd line or go 74-46-43 w/ 17-20-61 on the 3rd line. One thing that Sweeney has done that goes overlooked is add so many pieces that can move around/up and down the line-up. I mean really our depth wingers can play either side. 74, 63, 88 42 are really the only guys in the top 9 that are exclusive to one side.
27 avr. 2018 à 9 h 56
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: ON3M4N
The thing w/ TOR vs TBL is that TOR lives and dies by the stretch play and TBL doesn't. I don't think you see TBL give Boston the same fits that TBL did. Don't get me wrong, TBL can torch you in any given shift and they are insanely talented. I just think their style of attack is better suite for the B's defense then TOR was. If you really wanted to get Donato in the game, I'd look at maybe bumping Schaller for game (although he's a pretty big PK guy).

63-37-88
74-46-61
17-20-42
43-52-55

You could also consider bumping Acciari, dropping Backes to #4 (plays a similar game, just a better offensive player) and then you'd have 17-20-43 on the 3rd line or go 74-46-43 w/ 17-20-61 on the 3rd line. One thing that Sweeney has done that goes overlooked is add so many pieces that can move around/up and down the line-up. I mean really our depth wingers can play either side. 74, 63, 88 42 are really the only guys in the top 9 that are exclusive to one side.


Backes can be a solid center as well so even is pretty versatile. As a winger he is only on the right side. You might be able to switch 61 and 42. Rick Nash's speed is pretty underrated because he's a big body, and defensively is fairly responsible. Maybe pairing him with Donato is better than pairing him with Backes and Riley Nash. I think dropping Heinen down makes a lot of sense in this case.
27 avr. 2018 à 10 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Chopper02
Backes can be a solid center as well so even is pretty versatile. As a winger he is only on the right side. You might be able to switch 61 and 42. Rick Nash's speed is pretty underrated because he's a big body, and defensively is fairly responsible. Maybe pairing him with Donato is better than pairing him with Backes and Riley Nash. I think dropping Heinen down makes a lot of sense in this case.


He's a serviceable Center, but I think Backes is at his best on the wing. In a pinch he can play center, but your right he does have some versatility
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage