SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Why did they trade so badly?

Créé par: Pete
Équipe: 2017-18 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2018
Publié: 27 févr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Awful to loose J. T. with Mc. Please fire the management.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2019
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BOS
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $65 041 944 $0 $3 700 000 $9 958 056 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
UFA - 5
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 937 500 $1 937 500 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
2 825 000 $2 825 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
843 333 $843 333 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 févr. 2018 à 7 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,974
Mentions "j'aime": 14,619
I think everyone thinks the rangers did great.

Cleared alot of salary and ufas to rebuild quickly
27 févr. 2018 à 7 h 43
#2
BigBeardBurns
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 3,350
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Yeah, they had a great deadline. Did you see what they got for Nash, and McD & JTM could have been kept, but they knew they could get a lot out of them
27 févr. 2018 à 7 h 46
#3
DontToewsMe19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,178
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Yeah the Rangers didn’t do bad at all. 3 first round picks (No way Tampa doesn’t win the cup right?), Namestikov, 4 decent prospects, and well, Beleskey, but whatever. And they moved Holden, so that’s good.
27 févr. 2018 à 8 h 8
#4
Démarrer sujet
Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,358
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Other players should had been moved, not JT and McD. They rather move Hayes, Staal or Smith.
27 févr. 2018 à 8 h 20
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,027
Mentions "j'aime": 22,964
Quoting: Pete
Other players should had been moved, not JT and McD. They rather move Hayes, Staal or Smith.


C'mon Pete, Staal and Smith can't be moved. No team picked up Smith on waivers. No teams are interested Smith's or Staal's play or contracts.
27 févr. 2018 à 8 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,358
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: palhal
C'mon Pete, Staal and Smith can't be moved. No team picked up Smith on waivers. No teams are interested Smith's or Staal's play or contracts.


Hi Palhal, yeah I know. I haven't claimed they were movable. Just my wish to trade one or the other away from Manhattan. I would definately keep Miller and McDonagh.
27 févr. 2018 à 9 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,464
Mentions "j'aime": 147
I know it’s emotional and it sucks as a fan, but Hajek could replace McD as top LHD. Howden could end up top 6C maybe 1C. Namestikov and Miller are similar players and Namestikov may be a little cheaper to sign. They also got a few 1sts this year
27 févr. 2018 à 9 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,739
Mentions "j'aime": 469
Pete is a Russian Bot.

I feel like Hayes, Spooner, Miller and Namestnikov are all kind of the same, with Hayes and Nam being more pure C's and Spooner and Miller more suited to the Wing. So I guess I would rather have 2/3 of those guys able to play center and Spooner and Miller might be kind of interchangeable. Spooner needs an actual coach to properly deploy him though, which AV is incapable of and did a **** job with Miller on too. I also think Namestnikov might come in cheaper than Miller when all is said and done, which will be good. And anything that helps entice Igor to come over once his KHL deal is done is worth it in my book.

So then I look at it as McDonagh for a Howden (2016 1st), Hayak (2016 2nd), a 2018 1st and a 2019 2nd that has maybe a 30% chance of converting to a first. It sucks that Sergachev or Point were not included in this deal, but that is a decent return. I only think his return declines in the offseason when Karlsson is on the trading block as well and a contender only gets him for 1 year and playoffs instead of 2.
27 févr. 2018 à 9 h 43
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,739
Mentions "j'aime": 469
Quoting: Philu916
I know it’s emotional and it sucks as a fan, but Hajek could replace McD as top LHD. Howden could end up top 6C maybe 1C. Namestikov and Miller are similar players and Namestikov may be a little cheaper to sign. They also got a few 1sts this year


I think this is the absolute height of optimism and just as likely as us winning the number #1 pick, as in a decent chance but not likely. I think if howden can become a solid 2c and Hajak a shutdown LHD in the top 4, that would be a pretty amazing outcome and even further bolsters our now incredibly deep C pool of talent.
Philu916 a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2018 à 9 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 3
This is just Part 1, We still have options to trade especially Zucc. He will fetch a nice return at the draft. With Namestnikov and Zib we might not have a need for Hayes so he could go too because he is RFA. So we have 19 games for players to audition for next year.

I really liked what we did and the key now is to make sure we draft the most talented can't miss player at whatever pick we get. And the new coach that will come this summer needs to be the right man to get most of these kids into NHL players as quickly as possible. Just a matter of seeing which kids pan out.
Philu916 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage