SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pacioretty trade with Los Angeles

Créé par: aliceinwonderland
Équipe: 2017-18 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 25 janv. 2018
Publié: 25 janv. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Potential Pacioretty trade with LA
Transactions
MTL
  1. Kempe, Adrian
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (LAK)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Gabriel Vilardi
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de MTL
Logo de LAK
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de LAK
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 000 000 $59 017 976 $0 $182 500 $15 982 024 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
839 166 $839 166 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 9
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
748 333 $748 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
720 000 $720 000 $
AG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 janv. 2018 à 7 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Much to little in return for Pacioretty alone, add in JDLR and its too much for what the Habs are getting in return.
Most analysts agree that Bergevin should be looking for something similar to what the AVS got in return for Duchene.
The Avs ended up with 2018 1st and 2nd round pick, 2019 3rd round pick, Shane Bowers, Vladislav Kamenev and Samuel Girard for Duchene.

Pacioretty has another year left on his deal at $4.5 million, which is $1.5 million less than Duchene, and Duchene is two years younger.

MB should be looking for at least a first-round pick, another middle-round pick, and multiple prospects
25 janv. 2018 à 7 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 184
I wonder if the Habs could get Vilardi AND Klague in a Pacioretty deal to LAK...
willinbulgaria a aimé ceci.
25 janv. 2018 à 8 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: MONSTER1974
I wonder if the Habs could get Vilardi AND Klague in a Pacioretty deal to LAK...


I don't see why not, and I would keep that 1st rounder in there as well. If JDLR is thrown in, we would need another piece coming back, maybe a 3rd rounder.
25 janv. 2018 à 8 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 184
Sure, OTT gave up significant pieces for Duchene, but they didn't give up Chabot or White, considered their top 2 prospects
25 janv. 2018 à 9 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 184
I hope the Pacioretty deal is more about quality than quatity.

Sure, OTT gave up 6 assets for Duchene.

I'd take 1 quality asset for Pacioretty.
25 janv. 2018 à 10 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: MONSTER1974
I hope the Pacioretty deal is more about quality than quatity.

Sure, OTT gave up 6 assets for Duchene.

I'd take 1 quality asset for Pacioretty.


Even that "quality" prospect(s) can end up being busts - this is why when prospects are traded for there's always something else added in the trade to make sure the team acquiring the prospects doesn't get fleeced.
Remember, you're trading for a proven NHL'er with high calibre goal scoring ability for an unknown in the NHL.
I'll give you an example :
In order for Bergevin to move Sergachev for Drouin he had to include that conditional 2nd rounder because the risk TB was assuming was greater than the risk MTL was assuming. Sergachev was a prospect at that point with little to no NHL experience, so it was a high risk for TB that ended up paying out in spades, but in other words would never have gotten done without that conditional 2nd.
Now, I'll agree that adding to high calibre prospects like Vilardi and Clague may not warrant adding in a 1st, but you have to look at the risk MTL is taking on giving up their best goal scorer and the fact that Vilardi has been injured all year - who knows if these two prospects pan out (odds are they will - but nobody knows for certain).
26 janv. 2018 à 4 h 46
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 2
So I added a 4th and Kempe, is it better???
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage