SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

DHALIN, RNH, ETC

Créé par: Price_is_the_goat
Équipe: 2018-19 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 13 janv. 2018
Publié: 13 janv. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
ALL TRADES MADE AT 2018 TRADE DEADLINE
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
53 900 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 100 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Dhalin, Rasmus
3925 000 $
Schuldt, Jimmy
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2180 000 000 $66 912 975 $0 $782 500 $13 087 025 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
839 166 $839 166 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
748 333 $748 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 8
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 8
Dhalin, Rasmus
925 000 $925 000 $
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
UFA - 2
Schuldt, Jimmy
925 000 $925 000 $
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
UFA - 3
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 janv. 2018 à 18 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
The more I see the patches for RNH trade, the more I hate it for MTL and the more I hate it for Edmonton too tbh. They are only getting their piece for 1.5 years while MTL gets theirs at 3.5 years. Centers are more valuable also which is why I hate it for Edmonton. Edmonton I feel also has a bigger need for a RHD. Maybe something like Petry + Galchenyuk for RNH + Lucic. That would make room for Juulsen to take that 2nd RD spot and not force MTL to pay over 5 mil for a 3rd pair RD. Edmonton gets a 2nd pair RHD and solidifies their top 4 and gets out of the Lucic experiment. And it’s only like +2 mil in cap for Montreal so they can afford it. At least for the next 2 years. Just kind of spit balling. Possibly throw in a pick from Edmonton for MTL taking the bigger contract in Lucic.
13 janv. 2018 à 18 h 34
#2
Just a fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 90
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Pensfan89
The more I see the patches for RNH trade, the more I hate it for MTL and the more I hate it for Edmonton too tbh. They are only getting their piece for 1.5 years while MTL gets theirs at 3.5 years. Centers are more valuable also which is why I hate it for Edmonton. Edmonton I feel also has a bigger need for a RHD. Maybe something like Petry + Galchenyuk for RNH + Lucic. That would make room for Juulsen to take that 2nd RD spot and not force MTL to pay over 5 mil for a 3rd pair RD. Edmonton gets a 2nd pair RHD and solidifies their top 4 and gets out of the Lucic experiment. And it’s only like +2 mil in cap for Montreal so they can afford it. At least for the next 2 years. Just kind of spit balling. Possibly throw in a pick from Edmonton for MTL taking the bigger contract in Lucic.


The big problem with that is we have Gallagher and Shaw that already play that role so we don't need Lucic.
13 janv. 2018 à 18 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: IrishGates
The big problem with that is we have Gallagher and Shaw that already play that role so we don't need Lucic.


A Lucic-Shaw-Gallagher line could be a solid and frustrating line to play against. That’s the way I was looking at it.
13 janv. 2018 à 18 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Pensfan89
A Lucic-Shaw-Gallagher line could be a solid and frustrating line to play against. That’s the way I was looking at it.


Edmonton would need to retain on Lucic.
13 janv. 2018 à 19 h 29
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
Edmonton would need to retain on Lucic.


They wouldn’t retain. Probably would add a pick though. I don’t think a deal like this would happen, I just don’t really like the idea of MTL giving up patches now that they will actually be getting a decent center
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage