SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Capable of being cup champs

Créé par: Killipuck
Équipe: 2017-18 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 11 janv. 2018
Publié: 11 janv. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What do you think. Is this team capable of being cup champs
Transactions
1.
2.
ARI
  1. McQuaid, Adam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (BOS)
3.
ARI
  1. Krug, Torey
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
5.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
6.
NYR
  1. Cehlárik, Peter
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de PIT
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de PIT
Logo de BOS
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2275 000 000 $69 089 168 $0 $1 007 500 $5 910 832 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 6
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, AG
UFA - 3
2 825 000 $2 825 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
872 500 $872 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
808 750 $808 750 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
655 000 $655 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DD
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
858 750 $858 750 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 janv. 2018 à 18 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 98
Mentions "j'aime": 8
..
11 janv. 2018 à 18 h 52
#2
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
It’s all just terrible. Arizona gets boned out the door. What is that Krejci for seabrook deal? Nothing excites me more than watching that 7M dollar albatross patrol the bruins backend for another 7 years.
Kaifin a aimé ceci.
11 janv. 2018 à 20 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: BreKel
It’s all just terrible. Arizona gets boned out the door. What is that Krejci for seabrook deal? Nothing excites me more than watching that 7M dollar albatross patrol the bruins backend for another 7 years.


Rival fan here. I'd like to see this happen, except that OEL trade, he deserves better, but I cannot agree with you more.

I don't even know what to say. Ekman-Larsson plays for a young, underdeveloped (or bad, if you prefer) team, but he's a quality top-pairing defenseman. You've just bent Arizona over with that deal. You're also trading Krejci for Seabrook. That's 7 million dollars in one man until he's 39. I can almost guarantee you he won't be putting up a bunch of 40-point seasons when he's around Chara's age. Krejci centers your second line (I think?) and will probably put up more than Seabrook will. You also aren't stuck with Krejci's contract until he's almost in his 40s. Since the Ekman-Larsson trade doesn't happen (in any universe), let's say your Top 4 is Krug, McAvoy, Hjalmarsson, and Seabrook. Is that really an improvement worth sending away someone like Krejci?
11 janv. 2018 à 20 h 49
#4
BreKel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 3,537
Mentions "j'aime": 460
Quoting: Kaifin
Rival fan here. I'd like to see this happen, except that OEL trade, he deserves better, but I cannot agree with you more.

I don't even know what to say. Ekman-Larsson plays for a young, underdeveloped (or bad, if you prefer) team, but he's a quality top-pairing defenseman. You've just bent Arizona over with that deal. You're also trading Krejci for Seabrook. That's 7 million dollars in one man until he's 39. I can almost guarantee you he won't be putting up a bunch of 40-point seasons when he's around Chara's age. Krejci centers your second line (I think?) and will probably put up more than Seabrook will. You also aren't stuck with Krejci's contract until he's almost in his 40s. Since the Ekman-Larsson trade doesn't happen (in any universe), let's say your Top 4 is Krug, McAvoy, Hjalmarsson, and Seabrook. Is that really an improvement worth sending away someone like Krejci?


Yes, Krejci is the Bruins 2nd line center, and is still productive. While his cap hit is 7.25M AAV, a bit high, he's signed until 2020-2021. Over the course there, assuming no career ending injuries, I am much more confident Krejci makes it there being productive, than Seabrook will make it until 2023-2024. For the minor cap relief the Bruins get here, they fill a position that isn't a need in RHD, deal a solid #2 center and replace him with Spooner, who is less than ideal there.
Kaifin a aimé ceci.
12 janv. 2018 à 12 h 51
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,958
Mentions "j'aime": 8,909
I’m assuming you weren’t interesred in the trades being realistic and just wanted to focus on the team assembled because....damn. So to answer your question. No. Not a cup contender, to weak in the middle after Bergy. And PS....the trades were really lopsided. Just in case you didn't know that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage