SalarySwishSalarySwish

Tanev AND Glendening: Boldly Bolster Buds

Créé par: Liamthepro
Équipe: 2017-18 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 févr. 2018
Publié: 18 févr. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Yes a 2nd for Glendening. Please remember the Leafs got a 4th for Sosh. Still think it is just crazy to give up that super valuable pick? Also stop worrying about a 4C with a 1.8M cap hit. Luke is not old, and could be traded again later for value, as a faceoff winning 4C.
The Tanev deal is a big building block for Vancouver, and all of those assets will find better use there obviously.
I know, all three guys can probably make Van's roster before the year is done (Rosen in the absence of Tanev, and likely Gudbranson will also be dealt). And they have NHL futures, even on a real NHL team far better than these Canucks. But this is paying a real price. The Leafs have strong drafts to trade from, and all the pieces needed to be bold.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher
Détails additionnels:
Overpaying for Tanev, but he is what the Leafs need. It would be very hard to include Pickard and a 1st. However, Tanev for the next three playoff runs could result in glory. That is a bigger deal than the overpay.
VAN
  1. Leivo, Josh
  2. Pickard, Calvin
  3. Rosén, Calle
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Glendening, Luke (300 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Hoping to appease Wings fans who need to see a 2018 2nd for Glendening. He is worth it to the Leafs if DET retains a bit of salary. They have Green coming off the books, and other salaries should be traded for a brighter future, so they can afford a small retention, in order to get cheaper and pick 6 times in the first three rounds.
This way LG is only a 1.5M cap hit in the next three years, which is more palatable, but not make or break.
Maybe DET sends back a 2020 7th if they don't retain at all.
DET
  1. Rychel, Kerby
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Rychel has no future with Leafs and probably in the NHL at all.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2475 000 000 $74 493 333 $5 370 000 $4 550 000 $506 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Hyman, Zach
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Matthews, Auston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Nylander, William
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Marleau, Patrick
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Kadri, Nazem
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Marner, Mitchell
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
van Riemsdyk, James
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Bozak, Tyler
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Brown, Connor
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Komarov, Leo
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Glendening, Luke
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 4
Kapanen, Kasperi
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 2
Martin, Matt
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Moore, Dominic
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Rielly, Morgan
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Tanev, Christopher
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Andersen, Frederik
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Gardiner, Jake
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Hainsey, Ron
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
McElhinney, Curtis
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Dermott, Travis
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Zaitsev, Nikita
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Polák, Roman
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Carrick, Connor
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Horton, Nathan
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Lupul, Joffrey
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

18 févr. 2018 à 13 h 37
#1
littlejerryseinfeld
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,977
Mentions "j'aime": 14,621
Trading your platoon AHL goalie, your 14th forward that can't crack the lineup at age 24, an AHL depth defensemen and a late first for Tanev is not overpaying. Its underpaying
MajesticWalrus a aimé ceci.
18 févr. 2018 à 14 h 0
#2
DJSums17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,406
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Trading your platoon AHL goalie, your 14th forward that can't crack the lineup at age 24, an AHL depth defensemen and a late first for Tanev is not overpaying. Its underpaying


Pickard is an NHL calibre goalie. When he was with the Avs, he was the starter but it wasn't his fault they were losing they were just BAD! Lol
Leivo is a PP specialist that sure isn't in the lineup but that's because Babcock is stubborn has nothing to do with Leivo.
Rosen is unknown to me. He looked good when he was playing but had a couple brainfarts. He's played better on the Marlies.
The 1st won't be past 20th which is late 1st. Leafs are not contenders yet, Leafs are only in this position cause the Atlantic (beyond Lightning) is just SHOCKINGLY bad.

I don't see the intrigue with Tanev. He's not a make or break cup contending D man. If the Leafs get him it doesn't make them cup contenders.
clark a aimé ceci.
18 févr. 2018 à 14 h 1
#3
MajesticWalrus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,022
Mentions "j'aime": 351
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Trading your platoon AHL goalie, your 14th forward that can't crack the lineup at age 24, an AHL depth defensemen and a late first for Tanev is not overpaying. Its underpaying


Although i somewhat agree with you. The trade is still decent. A 1st is a 1st. Pickard has found some success at the NHL level already so what does it matter if he does bad on an AHL team, their AHL team could just be bad defensively and judging how their team needs someone like tanev, thats probably the case. But yes pickard and the 1st is whats enticing for the canucks here.
18 févr. 2018 à 14 h 2
#4
littlejerryseinfeld
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,977
Mentions "j'aime": 14,621
Quoting: DJSums17
Pickard is an NHL calibre goalie. When he was with the Avs, he was the starter but it wasn't his fault they were losing they were just BAD! Lol
Leivo is a PP specialist that sure isn't in the lineup but that's because Babcock is stubborn has nothing to do with Leivo.
Rosen is unknown to me. He looked good when he was playing but had a couple brainfarts. He's played better on the Marlies.
The 1st won't be past 20th which is late 1st. Leafs are not contenders yet, Leafs are only in this position cause the Atlantic (beyond Lightning) is just SHOCKINGLY bad.

I don't see the intrigue with Tanev. He's not a make or break cup contending D man. If the Leafs get him it doesn't make them cup contenders.


He started when Varmalov was hurt. He was traded for an AHL depth player and a 6th round pick 4 months ago.
you can't be a power play specialist when you have 10 NHL goals for YOUR CAREER
greasy a aimé ceci.
18 févr. 2018 à 14 h 3
#5
littlejerryseinfeld
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,977
Mentions "j'aime": 14,621
Quoting: MajesticWalrus
Although i somewhat agree with you. The trade is still decent. A 1st is a 1st. Pickard has found some success at the NHL level already so what does it matter if he does bad on an AHL team, their AHL team could just be bad defensively and judging how their team needs someone like tanev, thats probably the case. But yes pickard and the 1st is whats enticing for the canucks here.


pickard was traded in OCTOBER for an ahl depth player and a 6th round pick
Voir tout