SalarySwishSalarySwish

Playoff Avs - Adding Yandle, Recall Zads & Rant

Créé par: coga16
Équipe: 2015-16 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2016
Publié: 27 janv. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Yandle alwayas seemed like a good fit with the Avs, so a Team looks at being a buyer at the deadline to improve the team, could they land him with a deal similar to this.

The pick and decent prospect are pretty standard as part of a rental deadline deal, question is would Rangers want a cheap guy signed long term like Holden who is a pretty respectable but not glamorous 4-6 kind of guy.
Transactions
NYR
  1. Holden, Nick
Détails additionnels:
2017 2nd round pick
(conditional 1st if resigns)
RFA rights to Connor Bleackley
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2371 400 000 $56 588 596 $212 500 $3 760 000 $14 811 404 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
UFA - 6
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
675 000 $675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
675 000 $675 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
UFA - 4
843 333 $843 333 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
DD
UFA - 3
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
G
UFA - 2
850 500 $850 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 janv. 2016 à 1 h 59
#1
NateB19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 106
Mentions "j'aime": 7
On behalf of the Rangers, I accept.
28 janv. 2016 à 13 h 17
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 388
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Wayyyyyyy too high a price on Yandle who would not and should not figure into the Avs future plans
28 janv. 2016 à 16 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: LobsterMagnet19
Wayyyyyyy too high a price on Yandle who would not and should not figure into the Avs future plans


normally I would agree, but that really is close to the price of the premier rentals at the deadline, teams always have to over pay. Hes not worth that but if Avs ponied up to pay rental prices, I wouldnt be shocked to see a similar deal by them or another team
28 janv. 2016 à 23 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 388
Mentions "j'aime": 13
My point is that the price is too high for the Avs. They are not in the market for a rental and with the cap situation they would certainly not be able to afford Yandle beyond the season, so that makes the price (for 20 games only) sort of ludicrous. It's not ludicrous if you are A) a team vying for a cup right now or B) a team that could/would realistically keep Yandle, but the Avs are neither.
29 janv. 2016 à 15 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: LobsterMagnet19
My point is that the price is too high for the Avs. They are not in the market for a rental and with the cap situation they would certainly not be able to afford Yandle beyond the season, so that makes the price (for 20 games only) sort of ludicrous. It's not ludicrous if you are A) a team vying for a cup right now or B) a team that could/would realistically keep Yandle, but the Avs are neither.


I can agree with that, its too high for the Avs to pay since they shouldnt be burning assets on rentals, just fun to see if they did go all in, Yandle could be a guy I could see them target since the past few seasons Yandle ROR swap has always been talked about.
Voir tout