SalarySwishSalarySwish

Frisky Deadline

Créé par: oilers9783
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 17 févr. 2024
Publié: 17 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Unsure if this is enough, what would you want Sens fans?
OTT
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $76 916 667 $850 000 $4 200 000 $6 583 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
0 $0 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 125 000 $-1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

17 févr. à 3 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Calgary doesn't touch that
Take out the 6th and add Holloway
Otherwise no chance retaining and take a cap dump
17 févr. à 4 h 57
#2
What time is it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 304
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: Dubcity
Calgary doesn't touch that
Take out the 6th and add Holloway
Otherwise no chance retaining and take a cap dump


WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!
17 févr. à 5 h 7
#3
TkachukNorris79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Needs to be a 1st for Tarasenko with retention, he's one of the best forwards available - if you can only give a 2nd then the prospect needs to be much better (your 2nd round pick will be like 60th overall)

I'd consider the 2nd with Holloway, otherwise you offer easily gets beat.

Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!


Ceci having one more year is does not add to his value, it lowers it. He's a straight cap dump, so while a 1st and a 6th may (probably not) get Tanev, adding Ceci drops that value.
17 févr. à 5 h 18
#4
What time is it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 304
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
Needs to be a 1st for Tarasenko with retention, he's one of the best forwards available - if you can only give a 2nd then the prospect needs to be much better (your 2nd round pick will be like 60th overall)

I'd consider the 2nd with Holloway, otherwise you offer easily gets beat.



Ceci having one more year is does not add to his value, it lowers it. He's a straight cap dump, so while a 1st and a 6th may (probably not) get Tanev, adding Ceci drops that value.


That's a trash opinion! Tanev @ 50% retained for a 1st straight up is his peak! Adding a replacement that CGY could flip next TDL or sooner is Fn ludacris. Ceci & the 6th is completely unnecessary. Add a conditional 2025 3rd if they win the cup, nothing more!
17 févr. à 6 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: SHOWTIME_TTV
WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!


I'm aware he has 1 more year, he would 100% be a cap dump, exactly why we don't want him. It's not enough to trade with Edmonton period. I agree Holloway has potential exactly why he needs to be included to make this happen. Edmonton is no good.
TkachukNorris79 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout