SalarySwishSalarySwish

shelDONE

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 févr. 2024
Publié: 13 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Guentzel, Jake
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus (1 600 000 $ retained)
PHI
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Guentzel, Jake (3 000 000 $ retained)
PIT
  1. Cowan, Easton
  2. Minten, Fraser
  3. Niemelä, Topi
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
3.
TOR
ARI
  1. Guentzel, Jake
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
retain additional 1.5 million on long pencil guentzel
4.
TOR
STL
    Shaldon Keefe fired

    barube hired
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2026
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2183 500 000 $83 455 616 $0 $0 $44 384 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Guentzel, Jake
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    875 000 $875 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    13 févr. à 13 h 50
    #1
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,506
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
    I doubt this team would play for berube

    He’d demand to much of them and as this core has shown time and time again they can’t handle the pressure
    13 févr. à 13 h 55
    #2
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 6,987
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,590
    Quoting: xercuses
    I doubt this team would play for berube

    He’d demand to much of them and as this core has shown time and time again they can’t handle the pressure


    i think that is on sheldon, not on the team tbh.

    we have seen other teams who have stuggled to come together in the past suddenly play well under a new coach that demands discipline out of them
    xercuses a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 13 h 59
    #3
    Avid Sports Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2019
    Messages: 963
    Mentions "j'aime": 267
    Quoting: xercuses
    I doubt this team would play for berube

    He’d demand to much of them and as this core has shown time and time again they can’t handle the pressure


    At the same time, Keefe rarely held them accountable.
    But under Keefe they team had improved defensively every year until this year. This year the team had the biggest turnover on forward and defense. Kerfoot defensively is missed. Holl not great but could have helped depth wise same as Schenn.
    Not all of Treliving as he tried with 1 year contracts but 2 of 3 have failed. Klingberg huge failure but the idea made sense as now with the Reilly injury the biggest area all insiders say will hurt the most is the power play. Aside of Reilly they had no good puck movers.
    Second Bertuzzi was praised at the time but despite his advanced stats showing great hockey, he has been extremely unlucky to a point where you question if his previous point totals were lucky to get.
    Domi has not been great but at least doing enough worth a similar type of contract but still suspect defensively.
    All in all, Tre tried but his pieces work to a C- grade of D for the year and not sure how much Berube can help this year.
    Next year though could be much better.
    xercuses a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 18 h 34
    #4
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,506
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
    Quoting: hockeynutter
    At the same time, Keefe rarely held them accountable.
    But under Keefe they team had improved defensively every year until this year. This year the team had the biggest turnover on forward and defense. Kerfoot defensively is missed. Holl not great but could have helped depth wise same as Schenn.
    Not all of Treliving as he tried with 1 year contracts but 2 of 3 have failed. Klingberg huge failure but the idea made sense as now with the Reilly injury the biggest area all insiders say will hurt the most is the power play. Aside of Reilly they had no good puck movers.
    Second Bertuzzi was praised at the time but despite his advanced stats showing great hockey, he has been extremely unlucky to a point where you question if his previous point totals were lucky to get.
    Domi has not been great but at least doing enough worth a similar type of contract but still suspect defensively.
    All in all, Tre tried but his pieces work to a C- grade of D for the year and not sure how much Berube can help this year.
    Next year though could be much better.


    That’s completely fair too, I will say it’s just such and offensive team that idk if bringing in a defensive coach is the play
    The_Rocket et hockeynutter a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout