SalarySwishSalarySwish

Wennberg

Créé par: beantownboy17
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 févr. 2024
Publié: 13 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Hearing rumblings on Boston pursuing Wennberg. I've always liked the guy, I've seen him as a perfect fit 3C, a guy who is too good offensively to be a 4C but not talented in one particular area enough to be a 2C. I compare him to Pageau in my head.

I'd welcome the move, but I don't think it really addresses the need of a top 6 scoring wing. It would allow any of Frderic, Geekie, or JVR to move into the top 6 permanently, all of whom have had success there. Frederic looks ready to play up and Geekie looked really good with Pasta before, so it may be the next best thing to a top 6 wing.

Using the Monahan and Lindholm trades as references, the Bruins can't really pull off a super competitive package. Wennberg isn't worth a 1st, as he has a high cap and is underperforming compared to Monahan. Lindholm was worth a 1st, a conditional, 2 decent prospects, and a NHLer. I thought it was an overpay, but if we average hos deal with Monahans, I think we're at a middle round pick, a roster player to make cap work, and a good to great prospect.

Another move probably needs to happen to make cap work unless Seattle wants to eat a million or 2, but I threw that in assuming they'll make it work.
Transactions
BOS
  1. Wennberg, Alexander (1 500 000 $ retained)
SEA
  1. Forbort, Derek
  2. Keyser, Kyle
  3. Merkulov, Georgi
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Added Keyser as a veteran AHL goalie who can take over for Dreiger when he leaves as a UFA this summer.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 533 334 $4 500 000 $0 $2 966 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

13 févr. à 10 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,861
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Modifié 13 févr. à 10 h 37
Here’s my thinking. Is he an upgrade over Geekie. Not really. Pretty much a lateral move at 3C and fixes none of their problems.

On top of which Geekie has been much better at C than W this year. They could make Geekie C4 but that’s a waste.

Don’t really see the point of pursuing him other than insurance versus injuries at center, which would leave them thin. For that alone i would be ok with it, but they really need a goal scorer more and they don’t have the cap space for multiple moves.
13 févr. à 10 h 47
#2
BostonBoy17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 634
Mentions "j'aime": 193
Quoting: Gofnut999
Here’s my thinking. Is he an upgrade over Geekie. Not really. Pretty much a lateral move at 3C and fixes none of their problems.

On top of which Geekie has been much better at C than W this year. They could make Geekie C4 but that’s a waste.

Don’t really see the point of pursuing him other than insurance versus injuries at center, which would leave them thin. For that alone i would be ok with it, but they really need a goal scorer more and they don’t have the cap space for multiple moves.


Sound reasoning, and I agree. I think Geekie has proven he can play up and down the lineup, as has Frederic. The loss of Poitras puts them in a situation where they have to play Geekie at C, and I think they liked the flexibility of having him on the wing at times. This would definitely be a move to make a move.
13 févr. à 11 h 22
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,276
Mentions "j'aime": 7,029
Quoting: beantownboy17
Sound reasoning, and I agree. I think Geekie has proven he can play up and down the lineup, as has Frederic. The loss of Poitras puts them in a situation where they have to play Geekie at C, and I think they liked the flexibility of having him on the wing at times. This would definitely be a move to make a move.


frederic just hasn't proven he can play center yet.

I also just can't see the bruins making a move that hurts their defensive depth without simultaneously addressing that concern. Wennberg might be an interesting depth option if all other better options have failed, and they get him on the cheap. Honestly I would be going after Gourde. I would pay up for that even though he's definitely declining.
13 févr. à 12 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 821
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: Gofnut999
Here’s my thinking. Is he an upgrade over Geekie. Not really. Pretty much a lateral move at 3C and fixes none of their problems.

On top of which Geekie has been much better at C than W this year. They could make Geekie C4 but that’s a waste.

Don’t really see the point of pursuing him other than insurance versus injuries at center, which would leave them thin. For that alone i would be ok with it, but they really need a goal scorer more and they don’t have the cap space for multiple moves.


I just don't think him and Geekie are all that comparable playstyle wise. Wennberg, to me, is a center-only version of Mojo. Good passer, slick skater, reliable in his own end. I like how it lengthens the lineup, it just adds versatility. If one of Geekie/JVR/Freddy/Heinen etc are having a poor game, it allows you to play them a bit less on the 4th line and you can elevate whoever looks good from the 4th.

With the lack of assets the Bs have, I'm all for getting a guy like Wennberg for cheap. Don't see them trading Forbort without another dman coming back though
Voir tout