SalarySwishSalarySwish

If its a first round exit

Créé par: NYRxLundqvist
Équipe: 2024-25 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 7 déc. 2023
Publié: 7 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Fair trade?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
54 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
1800 000 $
21 800 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Bjorkstrand, Oliver
  2. Wright, Shane
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected pick
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de SEA
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 625 000 $83 269 857 $512 500 $3 120 000 $4 355 143 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 062 500 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
RFA
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

7 déc. 2023 à 1 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
That is a mediocre trade TBH.
Rangers decline.
7 déc. 2023 à 1 h 53
#2
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Quoting: Vancity2196
That is a mediocre trade TBH.
Rangers decline.


As a rangers fan I thought it was more than fair... but maybe I'm wrong
7 déc. 2023 à 2 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
I don't think that it's worth it for SEA. No need to rush to try to get by giving a sizeable package for a 31-year-old Zibanejad when Beniers is more than likely to turn into a 1C and Wright is coming along pretty well in his development and also has the potential to be a 1C. Adding Zibanejad alone is probably not going to be a huge difference maker for them right away, and when it is he's probably going to If someone like Pettersson were to become available then adding to this package to land him would make sense.

On the other side, the Rangers shouldn't be taking steps back, Trocheck isn't a 1C and they probably struggle to compete ultimately setting them on the course for a rebuild after failing for a few years. In the meantime, what are the chances that they mess up Wright's development? I could see it turn into a full-tear down even with the likes of Lafreniere and Wright being shipped off. Seems like a lose-lose trade to me.


As far as trade value goes though, I don't see them getting more than a Blue chip prospect selected in the top-5 + a 1st.
7 déc. 2023 à 3 h 51
#4
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Quoting: GMBL
I don't think that it's worth it for SEA. No need to rush to try to get by giving a sizeable package for a 31-year-old Zibanejad when Beniers is more than likely to turn into a 1C and Wright is coming along pretty well in his development and also has the potential to be a 1C. Adding Zibanejad alone is probably not going to be a huge difference maker for them right away, and when it is he's probably going to If someone like Pettersson were to become available then adding to this package to land him would make sense.

On the other side, the Rangers shouldn't be taking steps back, Trocheck isn't a 1C and they probably struggle to compete ultimately setting them on the course for a rebuild after failing for a few years. In the meantime, what are the chances that they mess up Wright's development? I could see it turn into a full-tear down even with the likes of Lafreniere and Wright being shipped off. Seems like a lose-lose trade to me.


As far as trade value goes though, I don't see them getting more than a Blue chip prospect selected in the top-5 + a 1st.


A lot here but I don't think petty becomes avaliable Vancouver is killing it. Also I think trocheck would be a low end 1st line center, he's elite on the draw, is good two way player and with panarin is putting up points. The rangers are going ti need cap space to keep all the younger players and the amount of NMC we have is insane. Also about value I'd drop the 1st to a 2nd mainly because I don't think Seattle could take all zibanejads contract.
7 déc. 2023 à 4 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: NYRxLundqvist
A lot here but I don't think petty becomes avaliable Vancouver is killing it. Also I think trocheck would be a low end 1st line center, he's elite on the draw, is good two way player and with panarin is putting up points. The rangers are going ti need cap space to keep all the younger players and the amount of NMC we have is insane. Also about value I'd drop the 1st to a 2nd mainly because I don't think Seattle could take all zibanejads contract.


Yeah, I don't think EP becomes available but was just using him more as an example of a young C becoming available (which doesn't happen often).

Maybe Trocheck ends up being serviceable as the 1C but the overall effect is probably going to be negative. As for keeping all the young guys, I think they are better off waiting and seeing what happens and kicking that down the road as long as they can. Will give more time for Lafreniere to continue to prove his worth, and Kakko to prove that he's worth keeping around. After Trouba, Zibanejad would probably be one of the hardest NMC to move unless he's going to a contender maybe. If I was the Rangers, I would move Kreider before moving Mika, and I think if he was sent to BOS (a less than ideal location to send him), he might be willing to waive. Both Zibanejad and Kreider could fill a need for BOS, but keeping Zibanejad is more important for NY imo. In the near-term, it would be much better to rely on Kakko and Lafreniere to replace Kreider than Trocheck and Chytil to replace Zibanejad.
Voir tout