SalarySwishSalarySwish

I Like This Team A Lot And I Only Want One More Move

Créé par: DougieGilmour
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 oct. 2023
Publié: 27 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 972 283 $0 $0 $527 717 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

27 oct. 2023 à 20 h 25
#1
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,235
Mentions "j'aime": 21,021
The Dcore becomes much worse besides the first pair

McCabe and Klingberg are terrible together

Klinberg is not a 2nd pair guy. Than you give Gio a worse partner

Pass
JesikaMorris a aimé ceci.
27 oct. 2023 à 20 h 26
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Yeah I don’t think leaf’s do this
27 oct. 2023 à 21 h 2
#3
TheLeafsAbuseMe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,514
Mentions "j'aime": 659
Quoting: aadoyle
The Dcore becomes much worse besides the first pair

McCabe and Klingberg are terrible together

Klinberg is not a 2nd pair guy. Than you give Gio a worse partner

Pass


They’ve played 39 minutes together in total. I’m willing to gamble on it working out between the two of them over time.
27 oct. 2023 à 21 h 21
#4
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,235
Mentions "j'aime": 21,021
Modifié 27 oct. 2023 à 21 h 27
Quoting: DougieGilmour
They’ve played 39 minutes together in total. I’m willing to gamble on it working out between the two of them over time.


Here's the thing it wont work

39 mins was enough to see how disasterous it was

If you need more proof here's some stats through 3 games together

High Danger Chances for 6
High Danger Chances against 20

XGF = 1.94
XGA = 3.26

X goals against per 60 = 5.45

In comparison

McCabe-Liligren in 4 games

High Danger Chances for 10
High Danger Chances against 8

XGF = 2.46
XGA = 1.91

X goals against per 60 = 2.22


So you would basically be making thing happen like they did games 1-3 very bad defensively and RIP the goalies. Gambling time's already passed for those two.

You dont put 2 things that have shown to not work together and expect them to work

As then we be repeating Muzzin-Holl and that pairing was a disaster.

But yea the Dcore above is not even close to an improvement over what we have 2nd and 3rd pair are downgraded
27 oct. 2023 à 21 h 34
#5
TheLeafsAbuseMe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,514
Mentions "j'aime": 659
Quoting: aadoyle
Here's the thing it wont work

39 mins was enough to see how disasterous it was

If you need more proof here's some stats through 3 games together

High Danger Chances for 6
High Danger Chances against 20

XGF = 1.94
XGA = 3.26

X goals against per 60 = 5.45

In comparison

McCabe-Liligren in 4 games

High Danger Chances for 10
High Danger Chances against 8

XGF = 2.46
XGA = 1.91

X goals against per 60 = 2.22


So you would basically be making thing happen like they did games 1-3 very bad defensively and RIP the goalies. Gambling time's already passed for those two.

You dont put 2 things that have shown to not work together and expect them to work

As then we be repeating Muzzin-Holl and that pairing was a disaster.

But yea the Dcore above is not even close to an improvement over what we have 2nd and 3rd pair are downgraded


I hated the Klingberg signing so I don’t see a good fit for him anywhere on the blueline. I do think Andersson drives offence all on his own more so than Klingberg does. Looking at Klingberg’s numbers from last year even on a bad team he still wasn’t driving offence, which is the one reason anyone would be interested in him.
Voir tout