SalarySwishSalarySwish

Karlsson with retention for Campbell

Créé par: pavelski_tip_in
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 mai 2023
Publié: 26 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Karlsson deal with net neutral cap swap. Holloway can be replaced with another prospect if you feel strongly about that part.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
21 200 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 400 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Ceci, Cody
  3. Holloway, Dylan
  4. McLeod, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Gregor, Noah
  2. Karlsson, Erik (3 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $72 585 001 $25 000 $1 795 000 $10 914 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (1 100 000 $$1M1 100 000 $$1M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 mai 2023 à 10 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,378
Mentions "j'aime": 284
lol. what is this. obviously not enough for the Norris winner.
26 mai 2023 à 11 h 27
#2
DougieWilsonNOT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 154
It's not that bad of a trade. Oilers are in a win-now situation, but i don't think they're going to give up on Campbell that quickly. One bad year won't matter, he can bounce back (see Bob in FLA for example). Adding a 2023 2nd + 2024 1st + Hollaway would be great for the Sharks rebuild but I'm not sure if they would go with the oilers as an actual trade partner within the division. I can see the sharks using the oilers and leaking info on their deal to get the price up and send EK65 to the east (all theoretical).
26 mai 2023 à 12 h 8
#3
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: NotDougWilson
It's not that bad of a trade. Oilers are in a win-now situation, but i don't think they're going to give up on Campbell that quickly. One bad year won't matter, he can bounce back (see Bob in FLA for example). Adding a 2023 2nd + 2024 1st + Hollaway would be great for the Sharks rebuild but I'm not sure if they would go with the oilers as an actual trade partner within the division. I can see the sharks using the oilers and leaking info on their deal to get the price up and send EK65 to the east (all theoretical).


With this retention you'd essentially be paying Campbell 8.5 mil. I'd rather have EK65 at 11.5 than 8.5 for Campbell. He's straight up not good, he's only had good numbers as a backup. This would be awful for the Sharks cap situation. Campbell is not in any EK package unless there's 0 retention
26 mai 2023 à 12 h 21
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 184
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: AStovetop
With this retention you'd essentially be paying Campbell 8.5 mil. I'd rather have EK65 at 11.5 than 8.5 for Campbell. He's straight up not good, he's only had good numbers as a backup. This would be awful for the Sharks cap situation. Campbell is not in any EK package unless there's 0 retention

One dumb idea that I had that wasn't included here was for the Oilers to retain a little bit on Campbell (like $1M). That way if you buy out Campbell in 2025 then his cap hit is under $2M for 4 years. Very palatable.

I think Campbell has to be included in any Oilers-Karlsson trade unless they do something like Yamamoto + Foegle + Ceci but then they'd have no depth and we'd have many players we don't want. Maybe that's better than one Jack Campbell.

This definitely would be a move with an eye towards tanking: no offense without Karlsson and no good goaltending is a recipe for another top 5 pick.
NotDougWilson a aimé ceci.
26 mai 2023 à 13 h 12
#5
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,067
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: pavelski_tip_in
One dumb idea that I had that wasn't included here was for the Oilers to retain a little bit on Campbell (like $1M). That way if you buy out Campbell in 2025 then his cap hit is under $2M for 4 years. Very palatable.

I think Campbell has to be included in any Oilers-Karlsson trade unless they do something like Yamamoto + Foegle + Ceci but then they'd have no depth and we'd have many players we don't want. Maybe that's better than one Jack Campbell.

This definitely would be a move with an eye towards tanking: no offense without Karlsson and no good goaltending is a recipe for another top 5 pick.


Your second option is the right one. Sharks are fine to take on cap dumps but not with term. Regardless I don't see a need from the Oilers with Ekholm and Bouchard already on that right side
Voir tout