SalarySwishSalarySwish

Getting Zub Some Russians

Créé par: SandersonTheGOAT
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 26 nov. 2022
Publié: 26 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I legitimately believe it could be in Ottawa's best interest to add a couple more Russians, just so Zub doesn't feel on his own. Zaitsev isn't gonna be back in Ottawa next season, so right now it'll be just him, and possibly Egor Sokolov.

I don't think Zub is going to leave, but I've always thought this could be the issue that could make him want to leave.

So here are a couple of Russians that I think Ottawa could use in their lineup AND that they could probably realistically acquire. Obviously you don't add Orlov AND Gavrikov.
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Trenin, Yakov
Détails additionnels:
Hard working bottom six forward with good defensive metrics and some offensive touch. Don't necessarily believe he's a 17 goal guy like last season, but would absolutely be an upgrade over some of the bottom six, and at 25 he fits where this team is.
NSH
2.
OTT
  1. Orlov, Dmitry
Détails additionnels:
Orlov is a great two way Dman with a real winning pedigree. Would be great to add another voice to the room who has been there, and he provides a lot of On ice value as well.

Washington is in tough this season, maybe they look for a shakeup? I don't know what he would cost though.
WSH
3.
OTT
  1. Gavrikov, Vladislav
Détails additionnels:
Big, strong dman who can defend. Sounds like he probably gets dealt, so if Ottawa thought they could extend him without breaking the bank he would be a great target.
CBJ
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2682 500 000 $84 904 881 $0 $4 875 000 $-2 404 881 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
821 667 $821 667 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 nov. 2022 à 9 h 46
#1
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,944
Mentions "j'aime": 3,437
Ottawa doesn't have the "mid-to-late 1st" that we've been asking for for Gavrikov in the event we can't resign him (that 1st is, ah, considerably higher smile ), so the only likely available route is an equivalent-value prospect at a position and/or with a skillset we need. Which would make it difficult to come up with an agreement. Personally I think it works for the Jackets if Grieg is offered straight up, but that could easily be seen as a Bad Idea.
26 nov. 2022 à 9 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: Viqsi
Ottawa doesn't have the "mid-to-late 1st" that we've been asking for for Gavrikov in the event we can't resign him (that 1st is, ah, considerably higher smile ), so the only likely available route is an equivalent-value prospect at a position and/or with a skillset we need. Which would make it difficult to come up with an agreement. Personally I think it works for the Jackets if Grieg is offered straight up, but that could easily be seen as a Bad Idea.


Despite Ottawa's off season, their 2nd is somehow tracking to be pretty close to a late 1st in value (Thanks DJ). Ottawa Definitely has the assets to bridge that gap, but certainly not Greig imo.

What would CBJ be looking for in terms of prospects?
26 nov. 2022 à 10 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 1,937
top-3 protected 23 1st for orlov from Ottawa, or 24 1st unprotected and B+ prospect (anything but a LD tbh). I think even if they decide to sell, they would prefer to keep Orlov and re-sign him -- its going to take a lot for him to be moved.
26 nov. 2022 à 13 h 24
#4
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,944
Mentions "j'aime": 3,437
Quoting: SandersonTheGOAT
Despite Ottawa's off season, their 2nd is somehow tracking to be pretty close to a late 1st in value (Thanks DJ). Ottawa Definitely has the assets to bridge that gap, but certainly not Greig imo.

What would CBJ be looking for in terms of prospects?

Two-way "reliability" centers - that part of the pipeline basically consists of Voronkov and that's kind of it (unless one still counts Sillinger as a prospect). Thus why I mentioned Grieg. We're full to busting on wingers on either side (some of which are also transition guys like Gaudreau and KJ), we've got plenty of prospect blueliners developing, and we've got a few very nice nuclear-boom-or-bust folks mixed in (*cough*cough*dumais*cough*). But we're a bit short on Quality Worker Bee and/or physical space-defining centers. (Hence also why we've had some interest in Horvat, despite the timing of acquiring him being potentially awkward and the extension price possibly being out of reach.)

We're also possibly a tad short on goaltending prospects behind Tarasov, but I can't imagine a goaltending prospect being considered an adequate substitute.
26 nov. 2022 à 14 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: Viqsi
Two-way "reliability" centers - that part of the pipeline basically consists of Voronkov and that's kind of it (unless one still counts Sillinger as a prospect). Thus why I mentioned Grieg. We're full to busting on wingers on either side (some of which are also transition guys like Gaudreau and KJ), we've got plenty of prospect blueliners developing, and we've got a few very nice nuclear-boom-or-bust folks mixed in (*cough*cough*dumais*cough*). But we're a bit short on Quality Worker Bee and/or physical space-defining centers. (Hence also why we've had some interest in Horvat, despite the timing of acquiring him being potentially awkward and the extension price possibly being out of reach.)

We're also possibly a tad short on goaltending prospects behind Tarasov, but I can't imagine a goaltending prospect being considered an adequate substitute.


Zach Ostapchuk fits into that mold. 19, 6'3 205. Big two way C with good skating and pretty soft hands. Had pretty pedestrian offensive production in the regular season last year, but he more than made up for it by being a double point a game player in the playoffs. Off to a rocking start this year. Doesn't have the top 6 upside that Greig has, but he's got a better NHL frame. I think he will be that kind stereotypical 3C. Size, faceoffs, PK1, some PP2. Play against top lines.
Voir tout