SalarySwishSalarySwish

offseason

Créé par: craprt12
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2022
Publié: 21 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
3975 000 $
23 350 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1825 000 $
33 900 000 $
1925 000 $
27 500 000 $
17 000 000 $
56 700 000 $
Transactions
PIT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $79 416 842 $0 $0 $2 083 158 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
975 000 $975 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 févr. 2022 à 7 h 51
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
ain't no one paying 4 mil for Rodrigues.
Just forget that.
He can be gone.

Bozak should retire.
21 févr. 2022 à 7 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: pharrow
ain't no one paying 4 mil for Rodrigues.
Just forget that.
He can be gone.

Bozak should retire.


I feel like 3.9M isn’t that steep. I think you’re paying for potential down the stretch seeing that he has shown flashes of being a great complementary piece. But maybe 4 is a little high.

But yeah aside from Bozak and needing to give more than Gruden for someone to eat Zucker’s contract, I think these decisions are really good.

Side Note: Before I get people saying ‘Oh but ZuCkEr isn’t a BaD pLaYeR’, it’s the 5.5M that teams don’t want to spend on him so yes you would have to throw something more to offload all of it.
21 févr. 2022 à 8 h 3
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: QualityTrades1
I feel like 3.9M isn’t that steep. I think you’re paying for potential down the stretch seeing that he has shown flashes of being a great complementary piece. But maybe 4 is a little high.

But yeah aside from Bozak and needing to give more than Gruden for someone to eat Zucker’s contract, I think these decisions are really good.

Side Note: Before I get people saying ‘Oh but ZuCkEr isn’t a BaD pLaYeR’, it’s the 5.5M that teams don’t want to spend on him so yes you would have to throw something more to offload all of it.


potential he's 29 next year.
I'd rather take 3.9 million to FA than waste it on ERod.

As for Zucker, I think you are kidding yourself. AZ like 1/3 of a team signed for next year. They will need not only forwards but cap space to hit floor.
The goal for Zucker on any team will be to flip him at TDL for assets if they can get him to score points. It won't cost much for the penguins to move him.
The only issue will be if Zucker blocks the move. That's the only issue.
21 févr. 2022 à 8 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: pharrow
potential he's 29 next year.
I'd rather take 3.9 million to FA than waste it on ERod.

As for Zucker, I think you are kidding yourself. AZ like 1/3 of a team signed for next year. They will need not only forwards but cap space to hit floor.
The goal for Zucker on any team will be to flip him at TDL for assets if they can get him to score points. It won't cost much for the penguins to move him.
The only issue will be if Zucker blocks the move. That's the only issue.


I get the Rodrigues thought but for 3 years at 3.9, it’s not a big risk for a 29 year old who has shown signs of turning the corner.

As for Zucker, you can’t just say that because Arizona needs a team they should take him for just about anything. The idea is that Zucker is paid a little more than he’s worth at this point and 5.5M is not something many teams are going to pay a lot for to add to a competitive roster because it limits moves for better players at similar prices.
Also, if it’s Arizona picking him up it’s because they’re getting assets for him. They’re not picking him up for almost nothing to fill out their roster or win a cup. And they’re certainly not doing it to help Pittsburgh with their cap space
21 févr. 2022 à 8 h 20
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: QualityTrades1
I get the Rodrigues thought but for 3 years at 3.9, it’s not a big risk for a 29 year old who has shown signs of turning the corner.

As for Zucker, you can’t just say that because Arizona needs a team they should take him for just about anything. The idea is that Zucker is paid a little more than he’s worth at this point and 5.5M is not something many teams are going to pay a lot for to add to a competitive roster because it limits moves for better players at similar prices.
Also, if it’s Arizona picking him up it’s because they’re getting assets for him. They’re not picking him up for almost nothing to fill out their roster or win a cup. And they’re certainly not doing it to help Pittsburgh with their cap space


no it is a risk, and one PIT doesn't need to take nor will. Hextall is smarter than that. Someone else can make that mistake although I doubt anyone will.

As for Zucker, yes I can and I did. AZ needs players, they will have a hard time bringing them in. No one is flocking to go there right now especially when they are taking on cap dumps. They need to hit cap floor. Instead of over paying someone on a long term deal it's easier to pick up a rental who can be flipped. They aren't picking up Eriksson or Ladd here. Zucker has talent. They also are showing their hand picking up guys with 1 year left.
Just look at the Ritchie trade. The Dman TOR got back is worth at least a 3rd. They took on a year of Ritchie for the difference between a 3rd and a 2nd.
They have 0 hope of Ritchie being flipped. But Zucker they do. Considering they need cap without it being long term and they have decent odds of flipping him out for a return. I don't see it costing them to move him. AZ is not the only team as well. A team like BUF could use Zucker as they need older players in the locker room of a rebuilding team. BUF would also benefit from flipping him at TDL.
So this idea he's a dump with no value is absurd. Lots of teams know there is value there. All they have to do is feed him the puck and tell him to shoot and pad his numbers and they get a return on a flip.
Voir tout