SalarySwishSalarySwish

Helping Anaheim

Créé par: JT_Miller
Équipe: 2016-17 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 11 févr. 2017
Publié: 11 févr. 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Even If the Ducks convince Bieksa to waive his NMC and they want to protect Manson along with Fowler, Vatanen, and Lindholm, either Silfverberg or Rakell are going to be left unprotected. And comparing their season I'd say they chose to protect Rakell so the Devils come in and offer an exempt young player and a pick for Silfverberg so they do not lose him for nothing.
Transactions
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Alex Kerfoot
Kerfoot projects as a middle 6 forward. Currently plays for Harvard, 22 years old.
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2018
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de FLA
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2019
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2473 000 000 $49 358 334 $0 $1 082 500 $23 641 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, C
NTC
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 4
605 833 $605 833 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
DD
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
1 666 667 $1 666 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DD
UFA - 3
587 500 $587 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
4 021 428 $4 021 428 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

11 févr. 2017 à 12 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 263
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Ducks need to get rid of D not forwards.
11 févr. 2017 à 13 h 12
#2
NYR v3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,400
Mentions "j'aime": 189
Quoting: dirtface
Ducks need to get rid of D not forwards.
If they chose to protect their top 4 defenseman, they are going to lose a quality forward to expansion. So, no they do not need to get rid of forwards however I'm trying to get value back for one of them instead of losing one for nothing to expansion.
11 févr. 2017 à 14 h 1
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: JT_Miller
Quoting: dirtface
Ducks need to get rid of D not forwards.
If they chose to protect their top 4 defenseman, they are going to lose a quality forward to expansion. So, no they do not need to get rid of forwards however I'm trying to get value back for one of them instead of losing one for nothing to expansion.


Ducks are going to lose a good player regardless. I'm not 100% sure what the point of losing a good player in a trade for less than ideal value and STILL losing a good player for nothing. Might as well lose one and keep the other, unless the value in a trade is actually there. No point selling low.
11 févr. 2017 à 14 h 33
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Lenny7
Quoting: JT_Miller
If they chose to protect their top 4 defenseman, they are going to lose a quality forward to expansion. So, no they do not need to get rid of forwards however I'm trying to get value back for one of them instead of losing one for nothing to expansion.


Ducks are going to lose a good player regardless. I'm not 100% sure what the point of losing a good player in a trade for less than ideal value and STILL losing a good player for nothing. Might as well lose one and keep the other, unless the value in a trade is actually there. No point selling low.


I think what they may want to do is trade Vatanen and keep everyone else. Montour fits the same mold as Vatanen and doesn't need protecting.
11 févr. 2017 à 15 h 16
#5
NYR v3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,400
Mentions "j'aime": 189
Quoting: Lenny7
Quoting: JT_Miller
If they chose to protect their top 4 defenseman, they are going to lose a quality forward to expansion. So, no they do not need to get rid of forwards however I'm trying to get value back for one of them instead of losing one for nothing to expansion.


Ducks are going to lose a good player regardless. I'm not 100% sure what the point of losing a good player in a trade for less than ideal value and STILL losing a good player for nothing. Might as well lose one and keep the other, unless the value in a trade is actually there. No point selling low.


By trading Silfverberg and having Bieksa waive his NMC, the Ducks can protect Perry, Getzlaf, Kesler, Rakell, Fowler, Lindholm, Vatanen, and Manson. What player of value are they at risk of losing for nothing? Cogliano?
Voir tout