SalarySwishSalarySwish

Sensible Playoff Lines

Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2021
Publié: 23 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
There is room for some juggling in the bottom 6 perhaps send Hyman to the 3rd line when on the road. Bogosian could be the odd man out, I really liked Sandin and Dermott.

Nash could take Engvall's spot if he shows well in practice. Injuries will happen though and we definitely have extra depth this time around.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $85 768 908 $0 $0 $-4 268 908 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
874 125 $874 125 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

23 avr. 2021 à 10 h 15
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,014
Mentions "j'aime": 422
I liked Foligno on the top line
Mikheyev-Nash-Hyman would be the 2nd best shutdown line in the league
ALso Thornton over Galch???
23 avr. 2021 à 10 h 26
#2
Biased Opinion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Galch should draw in
23 avr. 2021 à 10 h 30
#3
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
Quoting: LeafsFanZay
I liked Foligno on the top line
Mikheyev-Nash-Hyman would be the 2nd best shutdown line in the league
ALso Thornton over Galch???


Thornton of Galch is definitely something Keefe would do lmao.

I would go
Foligno - Matthews - Marner
Galch - Tavares - Nylander
Hyman - Kerfoot/Nash - Mikeyev
Thornton/Engvall - Spezza/Kerfoot/Brooks - Simmonds/Spezza

Personally I want Brooks in the lineup. I love him, he plays with intensity, he can pk and play on the pp. If he’s not in the lineup by next year at least I will riot. But I’m not sure he gets a spot unless injuries occur.

Defence, I don’t know what to do. Muzzin has been struggling. Holl declined real fast after his hot start. Rielly is atrocious defensively. Brodie has been alright, those passes out front need to go though. Dermott has been fairly good lately. Bogosian is solid. Sandin deserves a spot. This is maybe what I would test, before playoffs to see how it goes.
Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Dermott/Bogosian
Sandin - Bogosian/Dermott

Until Holl proves otherwise, at practice, that he can be a competent part of the d core. I’d sit him.

Split games between Campbell and Rittich until playoffs. Whoever plays better get the start in game 1. Game 2 goes to Andersen, if he blows it, he’s done. I think....
Goaltending is confusing.
23 avr. 2021 à 10 h 31
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: LeafsFanZay
I liked Foligno on the top line
Mikheyev-Nash-Hyman would be the 2nd best shutdown line in the league
ALso Thornton over Galch???


Absolutely Thornton over Galch. Look, it's not hard to notice Jumbo's lack of acceleration. He has none, his top speed is about average but it takes him longer than pretty much everyone else to get there. I'd wager in an end to end race he isn't the slowest guy on the team. Regardless, he is good with the puck, never costs you defensively, is physical and is a really good guy to have around from a leadership perspective.

Chuck is fast and has skill but is very bad defensively. He blows the high forward role often, misses his assignment in the defensive zone and he hasn't scored a pile of points either. He is all of the bad Nylander gets railroaded for but is way worse for it and offers a 10th of the benefit. If Keefe keeps Chuck on the 2nd line and runs Hyman on the 3rd, then he could he successful. Either way Thornton stays in the lineup.

If Columbus taught us anything last year, come playoff time, you can't afford to give away goals. Almost every goal against in that series came off an offensive zone turnover where the high forward (Kapanen on 3 occasions) failed to cover. The last loss against Winnipeg, chuck did that 3 times and they scored twice on those. Defenceman pinch it's part of the game and it is a big deal when it works and when it doesn't you need to have high forward protection. Kerfoot does it very well, as does Matthews, Marner, Hyman, Engvall, Mikheyev and Nylander. Chuck doesn't and for that reason alone I would rather have someone who provides less offence but doesn't give away bad chances against for the playoffs.
23 avr. 2021 à 10 h 31
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Barbs
Galch should draw in


Until he can prove he can play defence I would sit him.
Voir tout