SalarySwishSalarySwish

Experiment TDL w reduced quarantine

Créé par: Sonuvabirch69
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 26 mars 2021
Publié: 26 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Wallmark, Lucas
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Roussel, Antoine
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
Any team for defensive depth
3.
DAL
  1. Virtanen, Jake
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
A rumour I've heard as of late. Otherwise, Kyle Turris and a sixth would be the return here.
EDM
  1. Sutter, Brandon (2 187 500 $ retained)
5.
NSH
  1. Costmar, Arvid [Liste de réserve]
  2. Gaudette, Adam
  3. Lind, Kole
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
6.
VAN
  1. Foegele, Warren
Détails additionnels:
My reasoning behind such a move is the expansion issue. I don't know if Carolina will be able to protect a young forward like Foegele at the expansion draft.
CAR
  1. Pearson, Tanner (1 875 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Pearson will almost immediately provide depth for a deep playoff run this season. I added a pick as incentive for the Canes to give up Foegele. But if Pearson were to go to CAR, what would be his return here?
7.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PHI
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de FLA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 794 378 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $8 705 622 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 mars 2021 à 4 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 21
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Carolina's a good expansion target, but not for their forwards (as much as I like foegele). They're gonna want to re-sign Hamilton, and the three spots are him, Slavin, and Pesce. Would be more worth looking into Jake Bean or Haydn Fleury.

As for the others, with only one year left on both Roussel and Eriksson I feel like that's too much to give up for a cap dump, especially with the high likelihood that the 1st is a top ten pick. I like the Faksa deal, though I'm unsure if Dallas does it and I'm leaning no they don't, and I think that's close to fair value for Arvidsson normally but he's on a down year and it feels like a lot to give up for a team that can't really afford to squander assets.
Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 8 h 18
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,646
Mentions "j'aime": 9,772
I do this as a Hawks fan.
Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 10 h 16
#3
Kovid Klaw
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 779
Mentions "j'aime": 154
vancouver probably takes the fourth in the sutter deal cause turris is an ahl player
Sonuvabirch69 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2021 à 13 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 1,249
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: OverlordRisa
Carolina's a good expansion target, but not for their forwards (as much as I like foegele). They're gonna want to re-sign Hamilton, and the three spots are him, Slavin, and Pesce. Would be more worth looking into Jake Bean or Haydn Fleury.

As for the others, with only one year left on both Roussel and Eriksson I feel like that's too much to give up for a cap dump, especially with the high likelihood that the 1st is a top ten pick. I like the Faksa deal, though I'm unsure if Dallas does it and I'm leaning no they don't, and I think that's close to fair value for Arvidsson normally but he's on a down year and it feels like a lot to give up for a team that can't really afford to squander assets.


Thank you for your feedback. I’m not sure if Vancouver would want to look at Haydn Fleury or Jake Bean as players they want to acquire considering the defensemen on the left side. Jack Rathbone may be ready for the NHL next season and Juolevi might get some playing time at the NHL level, considering he’s been blocked by Jordie Benn on the defense chart. If you remove Benn, then you can add Juolevi to the left side. Would be ideal if we traded Alex Edler and he’s willing to waive his NMC so he can go to a playoff contender at the deadline. If you trade for Foegele, there’s someone the Canucks can protect come July. If the Canes re-sign Hamilton, it’s not the end of the world for their defense if they lose another guy. They got lots of prospects they can trade to Seattle to suede them from not taking those defensemen. I think they’ll most likely go after Skjei or Gardiner in the expansion draft so that will be a sigh of relief for this team.

For the Roussel and Eriksson deal, Roussel can easily be bought out at the end of the season in Chicago so chooses. Hey, Toronto only had to give up a first round pick to give up Patrick Marleau a few years ago, and he’s back in San Jose. Eriksson as we know is pretty bad, and he’s been bad since he arrived in Vancouver. At 35 or however old he is, he’s not gonna be able to turn it around I don’t think. So why not trade him? I get what you’re saying about the picks though, might be an ideal trade if it is completed before the draft once they know where they’ll be picking. Or perhaps they’ll turn it around before the season finishes. Roussel and Eriksson are anchors that have been weighing this team down.

For the Faksa deal, I believe that Virtanen will be able to turn it around if he is away from his hometown. Dallas has a lot of young players in their system that they can easily that position with, and playing with guys like Jamie Benn and Tyler Seguin might help him improve. It’s also just a matter of finding the right coach for him. Dallas fills their needs, and Vancouver fills their need for a 3C for the long term foreseeable future.

For the Arvidsson deal, normally he’s a good player but we haven’t seen much of that this year. Arvi may turn it around in Vancouver but he’s a pretty big deal in Nashville and a fan favourite I would have to say. Trading Adam Gaudette because after the Faksa deal, the Canucks don’t really need him if they’re pushing hard, unless he plays the fourth line with MacEwen and Vesey or whoever will be on the left side. Kole Lind is pretty much buried in Utica and bound to blow up in Nashville so he’ll be an interesting player there. Costmar is still a young prospect and if he can develop then he’s bound to have success in Nashville. The pick is just a pick. By the time Arvidsson’s contract is up, Podkolzin’s contract if he signs in the offseason will need an extension, so he can easily fill his role if he’s developed like he should.
Voir tout