SalarySwishSalarySwish

Rearranged lines

Créé par: Klara
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2021
Publié: 17 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
- the 3rd line needs to stay together, they work really well even if they haven't produced a goal yet.

- Balcers needs to make the bottom 6 if he comes here and clearly neither Marleau nor Kellman are up to the task of being the 4C, that leaves one of Chmelevski, Gambrell, or Handemark. Chmelevski is my favorite, but Gambrell still could prove he can be that bottom 6 player. Not big into what I've seen of Handemark in Sweden.

- Hard to make any changes to the top 6 since the Hertl line has been good, while the Couture line has been alright.

- Ferraro has easily been the best defenseman, and Karlsson hasn't been good, but Vlasic hasn't been either, put Ferraro with Karlsson to provide two very fast D who can move the puck. See if Simek can play with Burns when he gets back, and if not, try Vlasic-Burns, which worked surprisingly well during the 2019 Playoffs. I'm interested in seeing if Pasnichuck will be given a shot, but I think Knyzhov or Middleton should be good to pair with Vlasic.

- Marleau is on the 4th because its Marleau, though really should be Noesen.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 928 333 $0 $1 472 500 $9 571 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (425 000 $$425K425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
780 000 $780 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

17 janv. 2021 à 16 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,228
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Pretty solid. I’m very interested to see what Balcers can do when he gets here. And I think Handemark will likely be playing over Chmelevski for FO reasons. But I would like to see Sasha get the call.
yikes a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2021 à 16 h 52
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 47
I think they will try Donato- Gregor -Balcers and drop Nieto to the 4th line.

I’d also like to see Knyzhov will a real NHL partner before trying any of the other D we have.
17 janv. 2021 à 20 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,228
Mentions "j'aime": 4,666
I thought Sorenson played very solid in game 1 (I wasn’t able to see game 2)
From what I saw, Karlsson was on Ice for all of Arizona’s goals in game 1 and I believe at Least 2 in game 2, that is pathetic, any other player would have been benched, why is this lazy worthless man considered elite (maybe elite waste of money)
18 janv. 2021 à 0 h 39
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,090
Mentions "j'aime": 12,832
Modifié 18 janv. 2021 à 0 h 47
I have the lines exactly the same way you've oriented them - I agree with what you said completely (except for Karlsson, hes been okay; still needs to show more but I have my opinion that hes clearly easing into the season and being reserved due to his past injury and lack of preseason to be sure hes 100% for a NHL year, instead of killing himself like he used to do in the past). I like the lineup you put up and hope its the one we see. If anything were to be different Id say Id hope to see playing Simek on pair 1 and use Ferraro's strength with Burns to hopefully get him to wake up on pair 2. To split up Karlsson and Ferraro (our two best D currently).

Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I thought Sorenson played very solid in game 1 (I wasn’t able to see game 2)
From what I saw, Karlsson was on Ice for all of Arizona’s goals in game 1 and I believe at Least 2 in game 2, that is pathetic, any other player would have been benched, why is this lazy worthless man considered elite (maybe elite waste of money)


being on for a goal doesnt mean you suck - because if thats the way things worked than all goalies suck cause theyre on for every goal. (Plus minus is a very old and archaic stat that is worthless).
Karlsson has NOT been bad. Game 1; tough but he wasnt bad, wasnt good - he was average and played 32 minutes while he clearly was just warming up ( it was evident ), while I would only say 1 goal was partly his fault (the third, but karlsson isnt a physical player and would only be physical if it was the playoffs when its on the line, so yes he can be "blamed" but the goal was also just a unlucky bounce that squeaked through Jones).
Game 2 Karlsson was better and 90% of the team sucked; he was not part of that 90%. Hes also being over used due to our lack of a real third pair (except for Knyzhov), and lack of a top 4 (with Vlasic and Burns being underwhelming).

So lol...no he will not be benched nor is he worthless.
Klara a aimé ceci.
Voir tout