SalarySwishSalarySwish

Long term Sun for Jose

Créé par: Gordon_Bombay
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 27 août 2020
Publié: 27 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Before you start hating, I don't think this team will compete for 3 years at least.

So don't tell me that my team sucks or that it is unrealistic, tell me things I don't know

San Jose is not just one of the worst teams in the NHL, but also one with a terrible prospect pool.
Trading away things that still value would bring them something back to fill up their draft pool the next two years. I think this team is not quite as bad as Detroit, but it is not that much better, so they would still win 1st overall next year and the year after.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
15
TOR
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
28, 34
Move up, get Askarov, who can be a goalie in 3 years
2.
SJS
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Burns, Brent (2 000 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Subban, P.K.
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
4.
SJS
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
They can use someone like him

Pick top 10 protected
5.
SJS
  1. Dubnyk, Devan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
MIN
6.
ARI
    The Yotes have some cap issues
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $74 373 333 $0 $730 000 $7 126 667 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    27 août 2020 à 13 h 49
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 132
    If Dubas doesn't trade the pick in a deal for D I don't see him trading down. They would Draft a player.
    27 août 2020 à 13 h 53
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 160
    Mentions "j'aime": 47
    Hasso and Doug have both stated publicly that they intend to re-tool the Sharks and try to compete next year. Anyone who pays attention to the Sharks knows this is very unrealistic.
    27 août 2020 à 14 h 3
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 2,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 587
    Quoting: Onslaught77
    If Dubas doesn't trade the pick in a deal for D I don't see him trading down. They would Draft a player.


    The thing is, by adding Hallander and Robertson, they have two guys who can push for the roster

    their need is both for Ds and forwards, I don't see a D that is available at that pick that is worth taking that high.

    Dubas traded down for the Sandman already. I think this makes sense for both teams.

    Quoting: ASharksFan
    Hasso and Doug have both stated publicly that they intend to re-tool the Sharks and try to compete next year. Anyone who pays attention to the Sharks knows this is very unrealistic.


    I said myself above that it is unrealistic, but I think the result will be disapointing. And the prospect pool of the Sharks is bottom 3 in the league.
    27 août 2020 à 14 h 10
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 132
    Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
    The thing is, by adding Hallander and Robertson, they have two guys who can push for the roster

    their need is both for Ds and forwards, I don't see a D that is available at that pick that is worth taking that high.

    Dubas traded down for the Sandman already. I think this makes sense for both teams.



    I said myself above that it is unrealistic, but I think the result will be disapointing. And the prospect pool of the Sharks is bottom 3 in the league.


    The Leafs Draft the best player available. Drafting for an immediate need that late in the draft makes no sense anyway. Regardless of who it is if it becomes a not having a roster spot you trade him. Fans have issues doing that, the Leafs managment don't.
    27 août 2020 à 14 h 13
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 2,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 587
    Quoting: Onslaught77
    The Leafs Draft the best player available. Drafting for an immediate need that late in the draft makes no sense anyway. Regardless of who it is if it becomes a not having a roster spot you trade him. Fans have issues doing that, the Leafs managment don't.


    I can still do that at 28 and 34.
    Voir tout