SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blow it up part 1

Créé par: SamBennet93
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2020
Publié: 21 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Hamonic, Travis (657 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Blueger, Teddy
  2. Riikola, Juuso
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Brodie, TJ (1 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 235 332 $0 $747 500 $15 264 668 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
715 000 $715 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 janv. 2020 à 1 h 32
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
So you get a young 1rw who is on pace for 50 points on our third line who is signed 2 more years and expires rfa and we get an older Dman rental who is not playing well. And you think the difference between the two is the difference between a 3rd and a 4th?
21 janv. 2020 à 2 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,332
Modifié 21 janv. 2020 à 2 h 14
Quoting: Jamiepo
So you get a young 1rw who is on pace for 50 points on our third line who is signed 2 more years and expires rfa and we get an older Dman rental who is not playing well. And you think the difference between the two is the difference between a 3rd and a 4th?


Actually he's on pace for 46 or 47 points; but here's the real value...he's on pace for a whopping 16 goals!

KK has a lot of tools (mainly speed) but he's still needs to put it together..does a lot of overskating the puck, missing passes, etc. He's a decent cap hit but you guys tend to overrate who he is today and instead IMO should be focused more on his ceiling not the player he is today. He's not Kubalik who in his first year (48 games) is on pace for 55 points and 35 goals versus Kap who has 182 games under his belt.
21 janv. 2020 à 11 h 53
#3
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,924
Mentions "j'aime": 8,570
Quoting: ChiHawk
Actually he's on pace for 46 or 47 points; but here's the real value...he's on pace for a whopping 16 goals!

KK has a lot of tools (mainly speed) but he's still needs to put it together..does a lot of overskating the puck, missing passes, etc. He's a decent cap hit but you guys tend to overrate who he is today and instead IMO should be focused more on his ceiling not the player he is today. He's not Kubalik who in his first year (48 games) is on pace for 55 points and 35 goals versus Kap who has 182 games under his belt.


Quoting: Jamiepo
So you get a young 1rw who is on pace for 50 points on our third line who is signed 2 more years and expires rfa and we get an older Dman rental who is not playing well. And you think the difference between the two is the difference between a 3rd and a 4th?


Question for CGY fans: Why is LIndholm 1C?
21 janv. 2020 à 13 h 26
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: ChiHawk
Actually he's on pace for 46 or 47 points; but here's the real value...he's on pace for a whopping 16 goals!

KK has a lot of tools (mainly speed) but he's still needs to put it together..does a lot of overskating the puck, missing passes, etc. He's a decent cap hit but you guys tend to overrate who he is today and instead IMO should be focused more on his ceiling not the player he is today. He's not Kubalik who in his first year (48 games) is on pace for 55 points and 35 goals versus Kap who has 182 games under his belt.


He’s actually developing quite nicely this year much more patient with the puck and making smarter decisions. He’s playing in the third line and his point production is still good. Kubalik seems like a great player too but I would certainly give it some time to make any judgements.

Kapanen for hamonic this season is not a good trade for the leafs. Last year maybe.
21 janv. 2020 à 13 h 26
#5
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Question for CGY fans: Why is LIndholm 1C?

Lines have been in the blender all season trying to get some offence going.
Voir tout